全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Experimental Assessment of the Pre-Analytical Causes of Haemolysis and Their Effects on Serum Electrolytes (Na+, K+, Cl) and Glucose among Students of Florence Nightingale Higher Institute of Health and Biomedical Sciences Bamenda

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1115776, PP. 1-15

Subject Areas: Clinical Medicine, Hematology

Keywords: Haemolysis, Pre-Analytical Errors, Serum Electrolytes, Glucose, Potassium, Phlebotomy, Cameroon

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Haemolysis remains the most frequently encountered pre-analytical error in clinical laboratories, yet its specific impact on routine biochemical analytes under local laboratory conditions in resource-limited settings like Cameroon is poorly documented. This experimental study assessed the pre-analytical causes of serum haemolysis and their effects on serum electrolytes (Na+, K+, Cl) and glucose among students of Florence Nightingale Higher Institute of Health and Biomedical Sciences, Bamenda. A total of 21 participants were recruited using convenience sampling. Venous blood samples were collected and divided into control and test portions. Haemolysis was experimentally induced through three pre-analytical manipulations: forcing blood through a needle into the collection tube (T1), vigorous shaking of blood collection tubes (T2), and excessive centrifugation speed (T3). Serum sodium, potassium, and chloride were measured by spectrophotometry, and glucose was determined using a glucometer. Data was analysed using one-way ANOVA, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Vigorous shaking produced the highest degree of haemolysis (4+), followed by forcing blood through a needle (3+), while excessive centrifugation caused only mild haemolysis (1+). Potassium concentrations differed significantly across groups (F = 13.90, p < 0.001), with the highest mean in the vigorous shaking group (5.84 ± 1.05 mmol/L) compared to the control (4.26 ± 0.87 mmol/L). Sodium (F = 0.11, p = 0.953) and chloride (F = 0.28, p = 0.84) showed no statistically significant differences across conditions. Glucose levels were likewise unaffected (F = 0.39, p = 0.76). These findings confirm that improper specimen handling, particularly vigorous shaking is a leading driver of in vitro haemolysis and that potassium is the analyte most vulnerable to haemolysis-induced bias, with elevations large enough to produce clinically misleading results. Sodium, chloride, and glucose remained relatively stable under the conditions studied. The study underscores the need for reinforced phlebotomy training, strict adherence to specimen handling protocols, and routine haemolysis monitoring in teaching and clinical laboratories in Cameroon.

Cite this paper

Shalanyuy, L. H. , Ndzi, S. F. , Achungu, C. R. , Emlah, N. V. , Toboh, R. T. and Foncham, E. (2026). Experimental Assessment of the Pre-Analytical Causes of Haemolysis and Their Effects on Serum Electrolytes (Na+, K+, Cl−) and Glucose among Students of Florence Nightingale Higher Institute of Health and Biomedical Sciences Bamenda. Open Access Library Journal, 13, e15744. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1115776.

References

[1]  Plebani, M. (2006) Errors in Clinical Laboratories or Errors in Laboratory Medicine? <i>Clinical</i> <i>Chemistry</i> <i>and</i> <i>Laboratory</i> <i>Medicine</i>, 44, 750-759. <br>https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2006.123
[2]  Lippi, G., Salvagno, G.L., Montagnana, M., Brocco, G. and Guidi, G.C. (2006) Influence of Hemolysis on Routine Clinical Chemistry Testing. <i>Clinical</i> <i>Chemistry</i> <i>and</i> <i>Laboratory</i> <i>Medicine</i>, 44, 311-316. <br>https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2006.054
[3]  Guder, W.G., Narayanan, S., Wisser, H. and Zawta, B. (2009) Samples: From the Patient to the Laboratory. 4th Edition, Wiley-VCH.
[4]  Seimiya, M., Yoshida, T., Sawabe, Y., Sogawa, K., Umemura, H., Matsushita, K., <i>et</i> <i>al</i>. (2010) Reducing the Incidence of Pseudohyperkalemia by Avoiding Making a Fist during Phlebotomy: A Quality Improvement Report. <i>American</i> <i>Journal</i> <i>of</i> <i>Kidney</i> <i>Diseases</i>, 56, 686-692. <br>https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.06.014
[5]  Dimeski, G. (2008) Interference Testing. <i>The</i> <i>Clinical</i> <i>Biochemist</i> <i>Reviews</i>, 29, S43-S48.
[6]  Lippi, G., Avanzini, P., Aloe, R. and Cervellin, G. (2011) Studies on <i>in</i> <i>Vitro</i> Hemolysis and Utility of Corrective Formulas for Reporting Results on Hemolyzed Specimens. <i>Biochemia</i> <i>Medica</i>, 21, 297-305. <br>https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2011.040
[7]  Simundic, A.M., B&#246;lenius, K., Cadamuro, J., Church, S., Cornes, M.P., van Dongen-Lases, E.C., <i>et</i> <i>al</i>. (2018) Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI Recommendation for Venous Blood Sampling. <i>Clinical</i> <i>Chemistry</i> <i>and</i> <i>Laboratory</i> <i>Medicine</i>, 56, 2015-2038. <br>https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0602
[8]  Lippi, G., Blanckaert, N., Bonini, P., Green, S., Kitchen, S., Palicka, V., <i>et</i> <i>al</i>. (2008) Haemolysis: An Overview of the Leading Cause of Unsuitable Specimens in Clinical Laboratories. <i>Clinical</i> <i>Chemistry</i> <i>and</i> <i>Laboratory</i> <i>Medicine</i>, 46, 764-772. <br>https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2008.170
[9]  Carraro, P. and Plebani, M. (2007) Errors in a Stat Laboratory: Types and Frequencies 10 Years Later. <i>Clinical</i> <i>Chemistry</i>, 53, 1338-1342. <br>https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344
[10]  World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (2015) Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process towards Accreditation (SLIPTA): Checklist Version 2. WHO-AFRO.
[11]  Koseoglu, M., Hur, A., Atay, A. and Cuhadar, S. (2011) Effects of Hemolysis Interference on Routine Biochemistry Parameters. <i>Biochemia</i> <i>Medica</i>, 21, 79-85. <br>https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2011.015
[12]  Dimeski, G., Clague, A.E. and Hickman, P.E. (2005) Correction and Reporting of Potassium Results in Haemolysed Samples. <i>Annals</i> <i>of</i> <i>Clinical</i> <i>Biochemistry:</i> <i>International</i> <i>Journal</i> <i>of</i> <i>Laboratory</i> <i>Medicine</i>, 42, 119-123. <br>https://doi.org/10.1258/0004563053492739
[13]  Hawkins, R. (2012) Managing the Pre-and Post-Analytical Phases of the Total Testing Process. <i>Annals</i> <i>of</i> <i>Laboratory</i> <i>Medicine</i>, 32, 5-16. <br>https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2012.32.1.5
[14]  Cornes, M., Church, S., van Dongen-Lases, E., Grankvist, K., <i>et</i> <i>al</i>. (2016) The Role of European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group for Preanalytical Phase in Improving Quality and Patient Safety. <i>Clinical</i> <i>Chemistry</i> <i>and</i> <i>Laboratory</i> <i>Medicine</i>, 54, 607-613.
[15]  Nikolac, N. (2014) Lipemia: Causes, Interference Mechanisms, Detection and Management. <i>Biochemia</i> <i>Medica</i>, 24, 57-67. <br>https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2014.008
[16]  Sacks, D.B. (2018) Carbohydrates. In: Rifai, N., Horvath, A.R. and Wittwer, C.T., <i>Tietz</i> <i>Textbook</i> <i>of</i> <i>Clinical</i> <i>Chemistry</i> <i>and</i> <i>Molecular</i> <i>Diagnostics</i> (6th ed.), Elsevier, 498-540.
[17]  Gambino, R. (2007) Glucose: A Simple Molecule That Is Not Simple to Quantify. <i>Clinical</i> <i>Chemistry</i>, 53, 2040-2041. <br>https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.094466
[18]  Islam, M.N., Lyons, C., Griffin, T.P., Hamon, S., Dunne, F.P. and O&#8217;Shea, P.M. (2024) Maintaining Glucose Integrity <i>Ex</i>-<i>Vivo</i>: Impact of Preanalytical Specimen Handling. <i>Annals</i> <i>of</i> <i>Clinical</i> <i>Biochemistry</i>: <i>International</i> <i>Journal</i> <i>of</i> <i>Laboratory</i> <i>Medicine</i>, 61, 133-142. <br>https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632231199374
[19]  Chan, H., Lunt, H., Thompson, H., Heenan, H.F., Frampton, C.M.A. and Florkowski, C.M. (2014) Plasma Glucose Measurement in Diabetes: Impact and Implications of Variations in Sample Collection Procedures with a Focus on the First Hour after Sample Collection. <i>Clinical</i> <i>Chemistry</i> <i>and</i> <i>Laboratory</i> <i>Medicine</i>, 52, 1061-1068. <br>https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2013-1059

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133