All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99


Ultraviolet Light (UV)-Induced Photocatalytic Degradation of Diclofenac Using Naturally Derived TiO2@rGO Composite

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109990, PP. 1-13

Subject Areas: Inorganic Chemistry, Metal Material, Environmental Sciences, Green Chemistry, Environmental Chemistry, Functional Materials, Material Experiment, Nanometer Materials, Environmental Sciences, Chemical Engineering & Technology, Fundamentals of Material Science, Composite Material, Materials Engineering

Keywords: Diclofenac, Photocatalysis, Optimization, Titania, Wastewater

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Diclofenac (DCF) is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used to relieve pain in joint-related diseases. It is not completely metabolized after consumption and cannot be easily removed using conventional wastewater treatment. DCF has been detected in water bodies and may pose chronic effects on the endocrines of living organisms even at low-level exposure. Heterogeneous photocatalysis provides an alternative and efficient method of degrading DCF. In this study, the photocatalytic removal of DCF was investigated using the synthesized TiO2@rGO composite. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) was prepared from graphite powder by modified Hummer’s method using Capsicum annuum extract. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) was then impregnated in rGO via impregnation method. Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation experiments were conducted at room temperature using 100 mL of 10 mg·L-1 DCF solution. The effects of pH, catalyst loading, and UV irradiation time on the removal of DCF were assessed. Results of the parametric study showed that photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2@rGO composite in DCF degradation was directly proportional to the UV irradiation time and catalyst loading. The maximum DCF removal efficiency of 92.75% and nearly 100% was noted at 50 mg catalyst and 120 min irradiation time, respectively. Meanwhile, the maximum removal efficiency of 90.98% was noted at pH value of 6. Using response surface modelling, the optimum operating conditions in terms of maximum percent removal efficiency of DCF were pH at 6.44, irradiation time of 58.13 min, catalyst dosage of 49.98 mg, with 90% removal.

Cite this paper

Borromeo, L. E. , Bongat, L. P. , Nunez, J. P. S. , Mendioro, K. F. and Balisnomo, J. R. (2023). Ultraviolet Light (UV)-Induced Photocatalytic Degradation of Diclofenac Using Naturally Derived TiO2@rGO Composite. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e9990. doi:


[1]  Eniola, J.O., Kumar, R., Barakat, M.A. and Rashid, J. (2022) A Review on Conventional and Advanced Hybrid Technologies for Pharmaceutical Wastewater Treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 356, Article ID: 131826.
[2]  Zhang, Y.J., Geißen, S.U. and Gal, C. (2008) Carbamazepine and Diclofenac: Removal in Wastewater Treatment Plants and Occurrence in Water Bodies. Chemosphere, 73, 1151-1161.
[3]  Bonnefille, B., Gomez, E., Courant, F., Escande, A. and Fenet, H. (2018) Diclofenac in the Marine Environment: A Review of Its Occurrence and Effects. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 131, 496-506.
[4]  Klopcic, I., Markovic, T., Mlinaric-Rascan, I. and Sollner Dolenc, M. (2018) Endocrine Disrupting Activities and Immunomodulatory Effects in Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines of Diclofenac, 4-Hydroxydiclofenac and Paracetamol. Toxicology Letters, 294, 95-104.
[5]  Alessandretti, I., Toniciolli Rigueto, C.V., Torres Nazari, M., Rosseto, M. and Dettmer, A. (2021) Removal of Diclofenac from Wastewater: A Comprehensive Review of Detection, Characteristics and Tertiary Treatment Techniques. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9, Article ID: 106743.
[6]  Cantarella, M., Carroccio, S.C., Dattilo, S., Avolio, R., Castaldo, R., Puglisi, C. and Privitera, V. (2019) Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for Selective Adsorption of Diclofenac from Contaminated Water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 367, 180-188.
[7]  Suarez, S., Lema, J.M. and Omil, F. (2009) Pre-Treatment of Hospital Wastewater by Coagulation-Flocculation and Flotation. Bioresource Technology, 100, 2138-2146.
[8]  Qiu, Z.X., Sun, J.F., Han, D.D., et al. (2020) Ozonation of Diclofenac in the Aqueous Solution: Mechanism, Kinetics and Ecotoxicity Assessment. Environmental Research, 188, Article ID: 109713.
[9]  Nadour, M., Boukraa, F. and Benaboura, A. (2019) Removal of Diclofenac, Paracetamol and Metronidazole Using a Carbon-Polymeric Membrane. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 7, Article ID: 103080.
[10]  Morin-Crini, N., Lichtfouse, E., Fourmentin, M. et al. (2022) Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Wastewater Using Advanced Treatments. A Review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20, 1333-1375.
[11]  Priyadarshini, M., Das, I., Ghangrekar, M.M. and Blaney, L. (2022) Advanced Oxidation Processes: Performance, Advantages, and Scale-Up of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, Article ID: 115295.
[12]  Ahmadpour, N., Sayadi, M.H., Sobhani, S, and Hajiani, M. (2020) Photocatalytic Degradation of Model Pharmaceutical Pollutant by Novel Magnetic TiO2@ ZnFe2O4/Pd Nanocomposite with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity and Stability under Solar Light Irradiation. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, Article ID: 110964.
[13]  Lam, S.M., Sin, J.C., Abdullah, A.Z. and Mohamed, A.R. (2014) Photocatalytic TiO2/Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites for Environmental Applications: An Overview and Recent Developments. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures, 22, 471-509.
[14]  Ahmadi, M., Motlagh, H.R., Jaafarzadeh, N., et al. (2017) Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline and Real Pharmaceutical Wastewater Using MWCNT/ TiO2 Nano-Composite. Journal of Environmental Management, 186, 55-63.
[15]  Xiang, Q.J., Yu, J.G. and Jaroniec, M. (2012) Graphene-Based Semiconductor Photocatalysts. Chemical Society Reviews, 41, 782-796.
[16]  Kusiak-Nejman, E. and Morawski, A.W. (2019) TiO2/Graphene-Based Nanocomposites for Water Treatment: A Brief Overview of Charge Carrier Transfer, Antimicrobial and Photocatalytic Performance. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 253, 179-186.
[17]  Thakur, S. and Karak, N. (2015) Alternative Methods and Nature-Based Reagents for the Reduction of Graphene Oxide: A Review. Carbon, 94, 224-242.
[18]  Ismail, Z. (2019) Green Reduction of Graphene Oxide by Plant Extracts: A Short Review. Ceramics International, 45, 23857-23868.
[19]  Santamaría-Juárez, G., Gómez-Barojas, E., Quiroga-González, E. et al. (2020) Safer Modified Hummers’ Method for the Synthesis of Graphene Oxide with High Quality and High Yield. Materials Research Express, 6, Article ID: 125631.
[20]  Williams, G., Seger, B. and Kamat, P.V. (2008) TiO2-Graphene Nanocomposites. UV-Assisted Photocatalytic Reduction of Graphene Oxide. ACS Nano, 2, 1487-1491.
[21]  Yu, X.Y., Cabooter, D. and Dewil, R. (2019) Efficiency and Mechanism of Diclofenac Degradation by Sulfite/UV Advanced Reduction Processes (ARPs). Science of the Total Environment, 688, 65-74.
[22]  Dong, S.Y., Feng, J.L., Fan, M.H., et al. (2015) Recent Developments in Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Water Treatment Using Visible Light-Responsive Photocatalysts: A Review. RSC Advances, 5, 14610-14630.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us