全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Exploring College English Teachers’ Teaching Competence and Its Development in Curriculum-Based Values Education: An Ecological Perspective

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109817, PP. 1-14

Subject Areas: Teacher Education

Keywords: Curriculum-Based Values Education, Teaching Competence, Ecological Theory, College English Teacher

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Teachers play a key role in comprehensively promoting curriculum-based values education, and teachers’ teaching competence is an important guarantee of its implementation and effectiveness. From the ecological perspective, an empirical study is conducted on college English teachers’ teaching competence and its development in curriculum-based values education. This study establishes a framework of college English teachers’ teaching competence in curriculum-based values education, which consists of three dimensions, namely, cultivation literacy, disciplinary literacy and teaching competence. And each dimension has been further subdivided into 14 specific aspects. The study then analyzes influencing factors contributing to the development of their teaching competence based on the ecological systems theory model, and finally puts forward ways to develop the teaching competence. This study is expected to bring a new perspective for the research on teacher development, and provide insights for the development of teachers’ teaching competence and the construction of curriculum-based values education.

Cite this paper

Shen, Y. (2023). Exploring College English Teachers’ Teaching Competence and Its Development in Curriculum-Based Values Education: An Ecological Perspective. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e9817. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109817.

References

[1]  教育部. 教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202006/t20200603_462437.html, 2020-06-05.
[2]  教育部高等学校大学外语教学指导委员会. 大学英语教学指南(2020版) [Z]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2020.
[3]  Tigelaar, D.E.H., Dolmans, D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen, I.H.A.P. and van der Vleuten, C.P.M. (2004) The Development and Validation of a Framework for Teaching Competencies in Higher Education. Higher Education, 48, 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000034318.74275.e4
[4]  初良龙, 王学文. 新时代大学外语教师课程思政教学能力构建研究[J]. 湖州师范学院学报, 2020, 42(12): 26-30.
[5]  李小霞. 新时期高校外语教师“课程思政”教学能力提升路径研究[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 18(3): 153-156.
[6]  张彧凤, 孟晓萍. 大学英语教师课程思政教学能力研究[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2021, 41(21): 33-35.
[7]  张文霞, 赵华敏, 胡杰辉. 大学外语教师课程思政教学能力现状及发展需求研究[J]. 外语界, 2022(3): 28-36.
[8]  洪岗. 对外语院校课程思政建设的思考[J]. 外语电化教学, 2020(6): 23-31.
[9]  何亮姬. 大学英语教师“课程思政”能力及提升策略[J]. 牡丹江教育学院学报, 2022(6): 39-42.
[10]  高玉垒, 张智义. 大学英语教师课程思政教学能力的结构模型建构[J]. 外语电化教学, 2022(1): 6-14 102.
[11]  胡萍萍, 刘雯静. 大学英语教师课程思政教学能力现状调查[J]. 外语电化教学, 2022(5): 11-17 106.
[12]  彭剑娥. 生态系统视域下高校外语教师的国际发表研究[M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2019.
[13]  Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.
[14]  顾佩娅, 等. 中国高校英语教师专业发展环境研究[M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2017.
[15]  吴斐, 杨永和. 生态取向下民族地区大学英语教师专业发展模式研究[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2018, 39(10): 247-250.
[16]  Edwards, E. (2020) The Ecological Impact of Action Research on Language Teacher Development: A Review of the Literature. Educational Action Research, 29, 396-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1718513
[17]  Hofstadler, N., Babic, S., Lammerer, A., Mercer, S., and Oberdorfer, P. (2020) The Ecology of CLIL Teachers in Austria—An Ecological Perspective on CLIL Teachers’ Wellbeing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15, 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1739050
[18]  Mohammadabadi, A.M., Ketabi S. and Nejadansari, D. (2019) Factors Influencing Language Teacher Cognition: An Ecological Systems Study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9, 657-680. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.4.5
[19]  古海波. 高校外语教师科研情感叙事案例研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2016.
[20]  刘宏刚. 基于Brofenbrenner生态系统理论的外语教师发展研究: 综述与展望[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2021(2): 56-63.
[21]  Dörnyei, Z. (2007) Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[22]  Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[23]  庄智象, 戚亚军. 教学与科研互动关系的价值重构及其对外语教师专业自主发展的启示[J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2015(3): 31-35 95.
[24]  戴炜栋, 王雪梅. 信息化环境中外语教师专业发展的内涵与路径研究[J]. 外语电化教学, 2011(6): 8-13.
[25]  石坚, 王欣. 立德树人 润物细无声: 课程思政的内涵建设[J]. 外语电化教学, 2020(6): 43-45.
[26]  潘海英, 袁月. 大学外语课程思政实践探索中的问题分析与改进对策[J]. 山东外语教学, 2021, 42(3): 53-62.
[27]  Richards J.C. and Farrell S.C. (2005) Professional Development for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667237
[28]  Robson J. (2006) Teacher Professionalism in Further and Higher Education: Challenges to Culture and Practice. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203397299
[29]  王蔷. 课例研究——植根于课堂的外语教师专业发展途径[J]. 中国外语, 2020, 17(6): 55-61.
[30]  Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993) The Ecology of Cognitive Development: Research Models and Fugitive Findings. In: Wozniak, R.H. and Fischer, K.W., Eds., Development in Context: Acting and Thinking in Specific Environments, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, 3-44.
[31]  教育部. 教育部关于一流本科课程建设的实施意见[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201910/t20191031_406269.html, 2019-10-30.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413