All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

ViewsDownloads

Analysis of Text Readability of College English Course Books

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1107817, PP. 1-14

Subject Areas: Language Education

Keywords: Text Readability, College English, Course Books, Text Difficulty

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Course books are an important source of knowledge input in classroom teaching. Text difficulty is one of the key factors in choosing course books while text readability serves as an important indicator to measure the text difficulty. However, there have been few studies on text readability of college English course books in the past. This survey uses the WE Research platform and adopts Flesch Reading Ease and other readability formulas as the detection tools to study the text readability development of the course books. The researcher analyzes the surface text characteristics of word and sentence length as well as the readability index 1 and 2 of the texts in the 4 volumes of New Target College English Integrated Course to verify whether the compilation of the course books obeys the rule of text difficulty development from low to high. This article firstly summarizes the background, discusses the necessity of understanding text readability in college English teaching. Secondly, it reviews the development and the study of text readability both at home and abroad. Thirdly, it talks about the methodology of the study and discusses the data collected from the platform. It is hoped that this study can provide some guiding significance for editors, publishers, teachers as well as students.

Cite this paper

Zhang, B. (2021). Analysis of Text Readability of College English Course Books. Open Access Library Journal, 8, e7817. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107817.

References

[1]  http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/xw_zt/moe_357/jyzt_2020n/2020_zt04/baodao/202004/t20200409_441835.html
[2]  Alderson, J.C. (2000) Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732935
[3]  Richards, J.C., Platt, J. and Platt, H. (2000) Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (English-English—English-Chinese Bilingual). Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing.
[4]  Thorndike, E.L. (1921) The Teacher’s Word Book. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
[5]  Flesch, R. (1948) A New Readability Yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
[6]  Senter, R.J. and Smith, E.A. (1967) Automated Readability Index. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Aerospace Medical Division, Ohio.
[7]  McLaughlin, G.H. (1969) SMOG Grading—A New Readability Formula. Journal of Reading, 12, 639-646.
[8]  Flesch-Kincaid Readability Tests. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch%E2%80%93Kincaid_readability_tests#Flesch%E2%80%93Kincaid_grade_level
[9]  Dale, E. and Chall, J.S. (1948) A Formula for Predicting Readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 37-54.
[10]  Kasule, D. (2011) Textbook Readability and ESL Learner. Reading & Writing, 2, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v2i1.13
[11]  Le, M. (1983) Introducing a Scientific Method of Measuring the Difficulty of English Textbooks. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4, 47-49.
[12]  Yin, F. and Zhang, Y. (2009) On the Construction of College English Course Books in Independent Colleges. Science & Technology Information, 32, 3-4.
[13]  Pan, X. (2019) Comparison of Readability of College English Intensive Reading Textbook and CET4 Reading Materials. Culture and Education Data, 2, 208-210 205.
[14]  https://we.sflep.com/research/ReadingEase.aspx

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

微信:OALib Journal