全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

电商平台“仅退款”规则的适用构建与优化路径
Construction and Optimization Path of the “Refund Only” Rule for E-Commerce Platforms

DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1451449, PP. 1685-1689

Keywords: “仅退款”,电商平台,诚信原则
“Refund Only”
, E-Commerce Platform, Integrity Principle

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

部分消费者滥用“仅退款”规则已危害到商家与平台的合法权益,而最终责任将转由全部消费者承担,最终沦为“三方皆输”局面。应当坚持以《消保法》与《民法典》为指导依据,推进“仅退款”条款的适用情形分级管理,并明确平台、消费者、商家的权利义务,以促进“三方共赢”局面的形成。
The abuse of the “refund only” rule by some consumers has endangered the legitimate rights and interests of merchants and platforms, and the ultimate responsibility will be borne by all consumers, ultimately leading to a situation where all three parties lose. We should adhere to the guidance of the Consumer Protection Law and the Civil Code, promote the hierarchical management of the application of the “refund only” clause, and clarify the rights and obligations of platforms, consumers, and merchants to promote the formation of a “win-win” situation.

References

[1]  李卓谦, 曹威, 卢炫池. 图省事“仅退款”变“多赔钱”法院: 退货退款应遵循诚实守信原则[N]. 民主与法制时报, 2024-11-01(004).
[2]  安晓. 被“仅退款”逼疯, 卖家互助“自救”[J]. 商业文化, 2024(16): 10-13.
[3]  刘静. “仅退款”对电商平台的影响研究[J]. 现代营销(上旬刊), 2024(11): 103-105.
[4]  张华. “仅退款”条款争议背后的法律分析[J]. 法制博览, 2024(33): 47-49.
[5]  易军. 民法基本原则的意义脉络[J]. 法学研究, 2018, 40(6): 53-71.
[6]  王利明. 论违约救济的填平原则——以《民法典》第584条为中心[J]. 政法论丛, 2025(1): 38-53.
[7]  王轶. 论民法诸项基本原则及其关系[J]. 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 35(3): 91-97+132.
[8]  蒋永霞. 淘宝再度松绑“仅退款”商家不再谈“退”色变[N]. 中国商报, 2024-10-24(004).

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133