全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

数字经济背景下平台滥用市场支配地位的规制困境与出路
Regulatory Dilemma and Solution for Platform Abuse of Market Dominance in the Context of Digital Economy

DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2025.1451253, PP. 165-172

Keywords: 数字经济,互联网平台,滥用市场支配地位,反垄断
Digital Economy
, Internet Platform, Abuse of Market Ascendancy, Antitrust

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

数字经济背景下,信息技术的发展推动了互联网平台的繁荣,也导致了呈现新样态的滥用市场支配地位行为,当下在对其进行规制时,面临着相关市场界定存在困难、支配地位判断缺乏标准以及滥用行为认定陷入困境的三重维度障碍。对此,应当根据互联网平台的特性完善相关市场的界定制度,运用多因素判断法进行需求替代分析,并在双边市场的逻辑下优化垄断者测试分析方法;同时,细化并明确判断市场支配地位的标准,结合多重因素进行考量;最后,通过明确平台主体责任、综合判断主观目的、建立多元审查机制以及界定平台属性等方式构建完善的规则体系以准确认定滥用市场支配地位的行为,推动我国互联网平台经济的发展行稳致远。
In the context of the digital economy, the development of information technology has promoted the prosperity of the Internet platform, and has also led to a new pattern of abuse of market dominance. At present, when regulating it, it is faced with three dimensional obstacles: difficulties in defining the relevant market, lack of standards for judging the dominant position, and difficulties in identifying abuse. In this regard, we should improve the definition system of the relevant market according to the characteristics of the Internet platform, use the multi factor judgment method to conduct demand substitution analysis, and optimize the monopolist test analysis method under the logic of the bilateral market, at the same time, refine and clarify the criteria for determining market dominance, taking into account multiple factors; Finally, by clarifying the responsibility of the platform subject, comprehensively judging the subjective purpose, establishing a diversified review mechanism, and defining the attributes of the platform, we can build a sound rule system to accurately identify the behavior of abusing market dominance, and promote the development of China’s Internet platform economy.

References

[1]  刘继峰. 我国互联网平台反垄断制度的立法模式选择[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2021(1): 53-59.
[2]  杨东, 黄尹旭.《反垄断法》设置数字经济专章研究[J]. 竞争政策研究, 2021(2): 41-47.
[3]  谭袁. 互联网平台滥用市场支配地位行为规制的困境与出路[J]. 法治研究, 2021, 136(4): 110-123.
[4]  宋建宝. 数字平台市场领域禁止滥用市场支配地位制度适用问题研究[J]. 法律适用, 2024(6): 152-164.
[5]  张江莉. 论相关产品市场界定中的“产品界定”——多边平台反垄断案件的新难题[J]. 法学评论, 2019, 37(1): 184-196.
[6]  邹开亮, 王馨笛. 数字平台自我优待行为反垄断法规制研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2023(9): 62-67.
[7]  陈兵. 数字经济下相关市场界定面临的挑战及方法改进[J]. 中国流通经济, 2021, 35(2): 3-12.
[8]  张晨颖. 公共性视角下的互联网平台反垄断规制[J]. 法学研究, 2021, 43(4): 149-170.
[9]  陈耿华. 互联网平台社会责任的法理证成及制度实现——以竞争秩序为背景[J]. 现代法学, 2023, 45(5): 139-152.
[10]  王帅. 作为必需设施的超级平台及其反垄断准入治理[J]. 北方法学, 2021, 15(5): 148-160.
[11]  李扬, 袁振宗. 数字经济背景下互联网平台滥用市场支配地位行为的认定[J]. 知识产权, 2023(4): 78-107.
[12]  许光耀. 互联网产业中双边市场情形下支配地位滥用行为的反垄断法调整——兼评奇虎诉腾讯案[J]. 法学评论, 2018, 36(1): 108-119.
[13]  孙晋. 谦抑理念下互联网服务行业经营者集中救济调适[J]. 中国法学, 2018(6): 151-171.
[14]  周楠, 许昕, 蔡梦雨. 互联网平台企业的成长路径: 分类与特点[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023(12): 84-95.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133