|
|
E-Commerce Letters 2025
数字时代背景下企业ESG表现与供应链韧性：文献综述与展望
|
Abstract:
在全球供应链风险加剧与数字技术深度渗透的双重背景下，供应链韧性已成为企业应对不确定性的核心战略能力。本文系统梳理ESG表现对供应链韧性影响的文献演进脉络，基于数字时代特征重构供应链韧性内涵，重点聚焦创新协同能力与数字化敏捷性两大关键维度，揭示其作为现代供应链韧性内核的战略价值。通过构建关系稳定性、风险抵御能力、创新协同能力及数字化敏捷性四维分析框架，阐释企业ESG表现如何通过信号传递、资源赋能与信任构建三重机制提升供应链韧性的内在机理。研究发现，ESG表现通过优化信息环境、强化要素配置和降低交易成本，显著增强供应链网络的结构粘性、技术协同与动态响应能力。最后，本文提出未来方向展望，为后续开展数字时代下ESG表现与供应链韧性协同发展理论体系提供参考。
Amid intensified global supply chain risks and the pervasive penetration of digital technologies, supply chain resilience has emerged as a core strategic capability for enterprises to navigate uncertainties. This paper systematically reviews the evolutionary trajectory of literature on how corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance influences supply chain resilience. By reconstructing the conceptual framework of supply chain resilience in alignment with digital-era characteristics, we focus on two pivotal dimensions—innovative collaboration capability and digital agility—revealing their strategic significance as the kernel of modern supply chain resilience. Through a four-dimensional analytical framework encompassing relationship stability, risk resistance, innovative collaboration, and digital agility, we elucidate the intrinsic mechanisms by which corporate ESG performance enhances supply chain resilience via signal transmission, resource empowerment, and trust-building. The findings indicate that ESG performance significantly strengthens the structural cohesion, technological synergy, and dynamic responsiveness of supply chain networks by optimizing information environments, enhancing resource allocation, and reducing transaction costs. Finally, this paper proposes future research directions to advance theoretical frameworks for the synergistic development of ESG performance and supply chain resilience in the digital era.
| [1] | 信春华, 张笑愚, 王鑫怡. 企业ESG表现有助于稳定供应链合作关系吗? [J]. 经济与管理研究, 2024, 45(1): 35-54. |
| [2] | 李颖, 吴彦辰, 田祥宇. 企业ESG表现与供应链话语权[J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(8): 153-168. |
| [3] | 齐鲁光, 丁西林. ESG表现提高了企业的商业信用融资吗[J]. 会计之友, 2024(8): 17-23. |
| [4] | 林钟高, 韦文滔. ESG表现有助于降低客户集中度吗? [J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 47(1): 121-132. |
| [5] | 王群勇, 孟雅婧, 庞瑞芝. 企业ESG表现对供应链网络地位影响研究: 路径检验与机制分析[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2024, 44(4): 36-55. |
| [6] | 梁小甜, 文宗瑜. ESG信息披露能提升企业战略稳定性吗? [J]. 财会通讯, 2024(11): 23-27+33. |
| [7] | 李刚, 杨晓艺, 王唯可, 肖土盛. 供应商企业社会责任信息披露与客户稳定性[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2024(4): 78-91. |
| [8] | 张璞. ESG履责表现、供应链集中度与产品市场竞争优势[J]. 商业经济研究, 2023(12): 169-172. |
| [9] | Wu, L., Wang, M., Kumar, A. and Choi, T. (2024) Mitigating the Bullwhip Effect through Supply Chain ESG Transparency: Roles of Digitalization and Signal Strength. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44, 1707-1731. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-08-2023-0667 |
| [10] | Ginder, W. and Byun, S. (2022) To Trust or Not to Trust? The Interplay between Labor-Related CSR Claim Type and Prior CSR Reputation of Apparel Retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, Article ID: 102875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102875 |
| [11] | Groening, C., Ngoh, C. and Luchs, R. (2022) The Impact of a Firm’s Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm-Supplier Relationships: The Effect of Secondary Stakeholder CSR on Inventory Days. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29, 1689-1705. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2319 |
| [12] | 余典范, 李鑫, 张宇. 企业ESG表现与供应链风险[J]. 当代财经, 2024(12): 153-164. |
| [13] | 孙雅妮, 吴锡皓, 卜美文. 客户ESG表现对供应商绿色创新溢出效应分析[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 45(3): 49-60. |
| [14] | Han, S. and Wang, Y. (2024) Reducing Dependency: Corporate ESG Profiles and Customer Structure. Managerial and Decision Economics, 45, 4053-4071. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4224 |
| [15] | Tao, R., Wu, J. and Zhao, H. (2022) Do Corporate Customers Prefer Socially Responsible Suppliers? An Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 185, 689-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05171-5 |
| [16] | 鲁晏辰, 龚关, 冯小桐. ESG评级与信用评级相关性研究[J]. 新金融, 2024(4): 51-57. |
| [17] | 冯丽艳, 肖翔, 赵天骄. 社会责任、商业信任与商业信用成本[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 31(1): 64-74. |
| [18] | 廉永辉, 蒲运洁. ESG表现与企业商业信用供给[J]. 财会月刊, 2024, 45(22): 37-43. |
| [19] | Liu, X., Kou, Y., Shockley, J. and Smith, J.S. (2021) How Does Supplier CSR Performance Help to Expand Exchange Relationships with Major Buyers? The Moderating Role of Supply‐Side and Demand‐Driven Uncertainty. Decision Sciences, 54, 334-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12551 |
| [20] | 王生年, 张佩. 企业ESG表现影响了商业信用融资吗? [J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2023, 43(12): 59-77. |
| [21] | Huang, Y. (2023) Delicious Promoter of the Restaurant Business: Measuring Impact of Supply Chain, Brand Personality and CSR on Brand Equity Development. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35, 2521-2537. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-01-2023-0065 |
| [22] | Lee Park, C., Fracarolli Nunes, M. and Ishizaka, A. (2021) End-to-End Sustainability: Trade-Offs, Consumers’ Perceptions and Decisions Beyond B2C Interfaces. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28, 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-05-2021-0240 |
| [23] | Puriwat, W. and Tripopsakul, S. (2023) Sustainability Matters: Unravelling the Power of ESG in Fostering Brand Love and Loyalty across Generations and Product Involvements. Sustainability, 15, Article No. 11578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511578 |
| [24] | 万松钱, 鞠芳辉, 谢子远. 中小企业在供应链社会责任中的传导作用研究[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(4): 369-375. |
| [25] | 殷俊明, 程晨, 李媛媛, 姜乔. ESG表现的类保险效应研究: 基于公共危机事件的准自然实验[J]. 科学决策, 2024(1): 1-27. |
| [26] | 韩一鸣, 胡洁, 于宪荣. 企业加强ESG实践能否助力企业高质量发展——来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 产业经济评论, 2024(1): 21-40. |
| [27] | 粟金霞, 周利国. 供应链视角下企业ESG表现对客户违约风险的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2024, 21(9): 1392-1400. |
| [28] | 滕岸正, 李锦生. ESG表现能够降低企业绿色转型风险吗[J]. 金融与经济, 2024(3): 12-24. |
| [29] | 谭劲松, 黄仁玉, 张京心. ESG表现与企业风险-基于资源获取视角的解释[J]. 管理科学, 2022, 35(5): 3-18. |
| [30] | 郝颖, 李雪轶, 倪娟, 李江晖. 社会责任履行、信任凝聚与企业发展韧性——基于经济不确定性场景的研究[J]. 财经研究, 2024, 50(10): 94-108. |
| [31] | 周志方, 刘金豪, 杨卓璇. 城门失火, 殃及池鱼: 供应商环境违规对企业创新投资的传染效应[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2024, 36(4): 101-112. |
| [32] | Choi, S.U., Lee, W.J. and Choi, N.H. (2023) Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Management Decision, 61, 3169-3194. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-06-2022-0810 |
| [33] | Cui, X., Qi, B. and Hussain, M.J. (2024) Vendor Sustainability Performance and Corporate Customers’ Supplier Selection. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31, 2910-2928. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2727 |
| [34] | 陈娇娇, 丁合煜, 张雪梅. ESG表现影响客户关系稳定度吗? [J]. 证券市场导报, 2023(3): 13-23. |
| [35] | 李增福, 冯柳华. 企业ESG表现与商业信用获取[J]. 财经研究, 2022, 48(12): 151-165. |
| [36] | Bade, C., Olsacher, A., Boehme, P., Truebel, H., Bürger, L. and Fehring, L. (2023) Sustainability in the Pharmaceutical Industry—An Assessment of sustainability Maturity and Effects of Sustainability Measure Implementation on Supply Chain Security. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31, 224-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2564 |
| [37] | Kim, C., Zang, Y., Wang, H. and Niu, K. (2023) When Do Corporate Good Deeds Become a Burden? The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Following Negative Events. Journal of Business Ethics, 192, 285-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05511-z |
| [38] | 肖红军, 沈洪涛, 周艳坤. 客户企业数字化、供应商企业ESG表现与供应链可持续发展[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(3): 54-73. |
| [39] | 赵丽娟, 何泽远. 企业ESG表现的供应链溢出效应——基于供应商关系专用性投资视角[J]. 财会通讯, 2024(21): 38-43. |
| [40] | 刘海月, 李玮柯, 王以勒. 企业供应链网络的绿色溢出效应[J]. 管理学刊, 2024, 37(4): 66-81. |
| [41] | 李治国, 孔维嘉, 李兆哲. 数字化转型、供应链联动与企业ESG表现[J]. 财经科学, 2024(8): 77-91. |
| [42] | Stekelorum, R., Laguir, I. and Elbaz, J. (2018) CSR Disclosure and Sustainable Supplier Management: A Small to Medium-Sized Enterprises Perspective. Applied Economics, 50, 5017-5030. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1466990 |
| [43] | 王雅格, 胡志强. 企业ESG表现对供应链韧性影响的实证检验[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(8): 179-183. |
| [44] | 严若森, 姜潇. 客户企业ESG评级与供应商企业绿色创新[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 1-27. |
| [45] | 史梦昱, 闫佳敏. 企业ESG表现与供应商绿色创新——基于供应链视角的研究[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2024, 39(3): 97-106. |
| [46] | 李海港, 彭晖. 基于供应链视角的客户企业ESG表现对供应商技术创新的影响[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2025, 46(1): 126-133. |
| [47] | Lian, Y., He, X. and Gao, J. (2023) Do Customer ESG Performance Affect Supplier Innovation? Evidence from China’s Listed Firms. Economics Letters, 233, Article ID: 111372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111372 |
| [48] | 严兵, 程敏, 王乃合. ESG绿色溢出、供应链传导与企业绿色创新[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(7): 72-91. |
| [49] | Li, Y. and Zhao, T. (2024) How Digital Transformation Enables Corporate Sustainability: Based on the Internal and External Efficiency Improvement Perspective. Sustainability, 16, Article No. 5037. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125037 |
| [50] | Singh, A., Dwivedi, A., Agrawal, D., Bag, S. and Chauhan, A. (2024) Can Sustainable and Digital Objectives Synchronize? A Study of ESG Activities for Digital Supply Chains Using Multi‐Methods. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33, 8413-8435. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3925 |
| [51] | 李平, 吴新琪, 党修宇. 数字服务贸易开放提升了制造业企业全要素生产率吗[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2024, 40(4): 69-85. |
| [52] | Kumar, M., Raut, R.D., Mangla, S.K., Moizer, J. and Lean, J. (2024) Big Data Driven Supply Chain Innovative Capability for Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Food Supply Chain: Resource‐Based View Perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33, 5127-5150. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3745 |
