This paper focuses on engagement dynamics among foreign language students in coping within an immersive pedagogy in a tablet mobile assisted language learning (t-MALL) classroom ecology. This qualitative action research was implemented with 24 second-year undergraduates majoring in French as a foreign language in a Malaysian university. The pedagogical implementation included a task-based learning approach delivered according to personalized, meaningful and learner- controlled learning principles. In accordance with social constructivist theory, the implementation emphasized student-centered and controlled learning. Scaffolding choices involved instructor as well as peer and technological support in an immersive blended learning environment sustained with Facebook groups. The learners’ engagement was investigated according to grounded theory’s procedures. The learners’ perceptions of classroom learning processes were triangulated with the instructors’ reflections with a three-level coding applied to the constant comparative method of analysis. Findings supported the use of t-MALL as sustaining engagement in immersive learning environments. The learner-centered and controlled approach allowed just-in time triadic scaffolding which contributed to raising active participation throughout the tasks. The implementation of t-MALL enhanced the students’ perceptions of the learning environment which unleashed their willingness-to-communicate in the target language. Reaching volition further contributed to enhancing the students’ motivational factors of engagement towards acquisition and self-regulated learning. The discussion imparts recommendations and best practices towards efficient scaffolding for engaged language learning in immersive and participatory environments.
References
[1]
Abdous, M., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL Technology: Use of Academic Podcasting in the Foreign Language Classroom. ReCALL, 21, 76-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000020
[2]
Al-Schboul, M. M., Sheik, A. I., Nordin, M. S., & Rahman, Z. A. (2013). Foreign Language Anxiety and Achievement: Systematic Review. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3, 32-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v3n2p32
[3]
Alalou, A., & Chamberlain, E. (1999). Using Student Expectations and Perceived Needs to Rethink Pedagogy and Curriculum: A Case Study. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 27-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1999.tb02374.x
[4]
Anton, M. (1999). The Discourse of a Learner-Centered Classroom: Sociocultural Perspectives on Teacher-learner Interaction in the Second Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 303-318.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00024
[5]
Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Exploring the TPACK Framework. Computers & Education, 55, 1656-1662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
[6]
Arnold, J. (2006). Comment les Facteurs Affectifs Influencent-ils l’Apprentissage d’une Langue Etrangère? [How Affect Factors Influence Foreign Language Learning?]. Ela, 144, 407-425.
[7]
Bowman, R. (2011). Rethinking what Motivates and Inspires Students. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84, 264-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2011.592164
[8]
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New-York: Longman.
[9]
Chang, M.-M. (2005). Applying Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Web-based Instruction—An Investigation of Motivation Perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 217-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588220500178939
[10]
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
[11]
Chia, C. (2007). Autonomy in Language Learning, the Use of IT and Internet Resources. Singapore: Mc Graw Hill.
[12]
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[13]
Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting Learner Autonomy through the Curriculum: Principles for Designing Language Courses. ELT Journal, 54, 109-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.109
[14]
Crick, R. D. (2012). Deep Engagement as a Complex System: Identity, Learning Power and Authentic Enquiry. In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 675-694). New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_32
[15]
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[16]
Dick, B. (2007). What Can Grounded Theorists and Action Researchers Learn from Each Other? In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (pp. 398-416). London: Sage Publications.
[17]
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667343
[18]
Friese, S. (2012). Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS.ti. London: Sage Publications.
[19]
Gabarre, C., & Gabarre, S. (2012). Criteria for Successfully Recruiting Online Peer-Tutors in Foreign Languages. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32, 197-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.684954
[20]
Gabarre, C., Gabarre, S., Din, R., Shah, P. M., & Karim, A. A. (2014). iPads in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Learner’s Perspective. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 20, 115-128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2014-2001-09
[21]
Godwin-Jones, R. (2014). Emerging Technologies: Games in Language Learning: Opportunities and Challenges. Language Learning & Technology, 18, 9-19.
[22]
Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical Considerations for Understanding Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57, 1953-1960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010
[23]
Haghighi, M. M., & Jusan, M. M. (2012). Exploring Students Behaviour on Seating Arrangements in Learning Environment: A Review. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 287-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.032
[24]
Hickey, D. T. (1997). Motivation and Contemporary Socio-Constructivist Instructional Perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 32, 175-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3203_3
[25]
Huang, J. H., Lin, Y. R., & Chuang, S. T. (2007). Elucidating User Behavior of Mobile Learning: A Perspective of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. The Electronic Library, 25, 585-598.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02640470710829569
[26]
Humphreys, G., & Spratt, M. (2008). Many Languages, Many Motivations: A Study of Hong Kong Students’ Motivation to Learn Different Target Languages. System, 36, 313-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.09.010
[27]
Karchner-Ober, R. (2012). Speaking, Reading and Writing in Three Languages. Preferences and Attitudes of Multilingual Malaysian Students. International Journal of Multilingualism, 9, 385-406.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2012.714382
[28]
Krashen, S. D. (2013). The Case for Non-Targeted, Comprehensible Input. Journal of Bilingual Education Research and Instruction, 15, 102-110.
[29]
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International English Language Teaching.
[30]
Language Policy Division (2009). Relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR): A Manual. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
[31]
Liu, M., & Jackson, J. (2008). An Exploration of Chinese EFL Learners’ Unwillingness to Communicate and Foreign Language Anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 71-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00687.x
[32]
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to Communicate in the Second Language: Understanding the Decision to Speak as a Volitional Process. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 564-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.x
[33]
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003). Talking in Order to Learn: Willingness to Communicate and Intensive Language Programs. Canadian Modern LanguageReview/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 59, 589-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.589
[34]
Méndez, D., & Slisko, J. (2013). Software Socrative and Smartphones as Tools for Implementation of Basic Processes of Active Physics Learning in Classroom: An Initial Feasibility Study with Prospective Teachers. European Journal of Physics Education, 4, 17-24.
[35]
Mills, G. E. (2011). Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
[36]
Nakatani, Y. (2012). Exploring the Implementation of the CEFR in Asian Contexts: Focus on Communication Strategies. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 771-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.196
[37]
Pamuk, S. (2012). Understanding Preservice Teachers’ Technology Use through TPACK Framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 425-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00447.x
[38]
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, Jangle, and Conceptual Haziness: Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 3-19). New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1
[39]
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 123-149.
[40]
Stringer, E. (2008). Action Research in Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
[41]
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[42]
Wang, M., Shen, R., Novak, D., & Pan, X. (2008). The Impact of Mobile Learning on Students’ Learning Behaviours and Performance: Report from a Large Blended Classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 673-695.
[43]
Wharton, G. (2000). Language Learning Strategy Use of Bilingual Foreign Language Learners in Singapore. Language Learning, 50, 203-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00117
[44]
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2