全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

A Comparative Study of Zhu Shenghao’s and Liang Shiqiu’s Translations of Hamlet from the Perspective of Skopos Theory

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1115784, PP. 1-9

Subject Areas: Literature

Keywords: Hamlet, Zhu Shenghao, Liang Shiqiu, Skopos Theory

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Skopos theory provides the theoretical framework for a comparative study of two canonical Chinese translations of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, namely those by Zhu Shenghao and Liang Shiqiu. Working from the same source text, the two translators produced different versions, a divergence attributable to their distinct translational purposes, shaped by differing historical contexts, target audiences, and cultural missions. Zhu Shenghao, translating during the War of Resistance, aimed to popularize Western classics among the general Chinese readership; he predominantly adopted domestication, recreating puns and toning down vulgar expressions to ensure readability and stage performance, with priority given to intratextual coherence. Liang Shiqiu, engaged in a long-term academic project, sought to produce a scholarly reference edition; his translation favors foreignization, preserving cultural proper names, linguistic ambiguities, and Elizabethan vernacular, with primary commitment to intertextual coherence and textual fidelity. Through comparative analysis of cultural imagery, puns, and vulgar language in selected passages, translation purpose is shown to determine strategy selection. The complementary coexistence of Zhu’s version and Liang’s version enriches Hamlet’s Chinese reception, confirming the explanatory power of Skopos theory in evaluating literary translations with divergent social functions. This also offers a valuable lesson for the current retranslation boom.

Cite this paper

Qian, K. (2026). A Comparative Study of Zhu Shenghao’s and Liang Shiqiu’s Translations of Hamlet from the Perspective of Skopos Theory. Open Access Library Journal, 13, e15784. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1115784.

References

[1]  王珍. 《哈姆雷特》两个中译本的译者主体性分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2010.
[2]  谢世坚, 赵洁. 多元系统理论视角下《哈姆雷特》的汉译——历史文化语境下《哈姆雷特》四种译本对比[J]. 宜春学院学报, 2018, 40(10): 67-71.
[3]  李伟昉. 接受与流变: 莎士比亚在近现代中国[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(5): 150-166+222.
[4]  周晔. 从《哈姆雷特》多个中译本看文学翻译中双关的处理策略[J]. 中国翻译, 2008, 29(6): 43-48+93.
[5]  胡开宝, 朱一凡. 基于语料库的莎剧《哈姆雷特》汉译文本中显化现象及其动因研究[J]. 外语研究, 2008(2): 72-80+112.
[6]  朱静文. 翻译目的论视角下《哈姆雷特》汉译对比研究[J]. 文学教育(上), 2021(8): 131-133.
[7]  张美芳. 翻译研究的功能途径[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2005.
[8]  朱生豪. 朱生豪书信全编[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 2018.
[9]  莎士比亚. 莎士比亚悲剧全集[M]. 朱生豪, 译. 北京: 中国书店出版社, 2017.
[10]  柯飞. 梁实秋谈翻译莎士比亚[J]. 外语教学与研究, 1988(1): 46-51.
[11]  莎士比亚. 哈姆雷特[M]. 梁实秋, 译. 北京: 中国广播电视出版社, 2001.
[12]  莎士比亚. 哈姆雷特[M]. 朱生豪, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2013.

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133