Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Color Matching between Acrylic Resin-Based Artificial Teeth and Conventional Shade Guides: An in Vitro Comparative Study
Introduction: Accurate shade selection is essential for achieving aesthetic harmony in prosthetic restorations. However, discrepancies often arise when matching commercial prosthetic teeth with standardized shade guides. This study aimed to evaluate the chromatic compatibility between commercially available prosthetic teeth and two types of shade guides: the conventional Vita Classic? and manufacturer-specific shade guides. Methods: An in vitro comparative study was conducted on 13 brands of prosthetic teeth widely distributed in the Moroccan market. Color assessment was limited to shades A1, A2, and A3, based on their high prevalence in the local population. Color measurements were performed using the Spectroshade? spectrophotometer and analyzed in the CIE Lab* color space. Delta-E values were calculated to quantify the chromatic deviation between the commercial teeth and the reference shade tabs. The threshold of visual perceptibility was set at ΔE = 3.7. Results: Significant chromatic discrepancies were found between most commercial prosthetic teeth and the Vita Classic? shade tabs, with average Delta-E values exceeding the perceptual threshold. Only the Ivoclar? (original) brand showed consistent matching with its own shade guide across all tested shades. The Acry Lux? brand demonstrated acceptable results for select shades. Additionally, no direct correlation was observed between the number of resin layers and color matching precision. Conclusion: This study highlights the limitations of using universal shade guides such as Vita Classic? for selecting commercial prosthetic teeth. Manufacturer-specific shade guides, particularly those provided by Ivoclar? and Acry Lux?, showed greater chromatic accuracy. Clinicians are encouraged to prioritize shade selection based on the actual prosthetic teeth to be used and to employ digital shade matching tools to minimize subjective variability and improve aesthetic outcomes.
Cite this paper
Mazzir, N. , Benazouz, I. , Maftouh, B. and Jouhadi, E. M. (2026). Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Color Matching between Acrylic Resin-Based Artificial Teeth and Conventional Shade Guides: An in Vitro Comparative Study. Open Access Library Journal, 13, e15209. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1115209.
Sproull, R.C. (1974) Color Matching in Dentistry. Part III. Color Control. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 31, 146-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(74)90049-3
Johnston, W.M. and Kao, E.C. (1989) Assessment of Appearance Match by Visual Observation and Clinical Colorimetry. Journal of Dental Research, 68, 819-822. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680051301
Dagg, H., O'Connell, B., Claffey, N., Byrne, D. and Gorman, C. (2004) The Influence of Some Differ-ent Factors on the Accuracy of Shade Selection. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 31, 900-904. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01310.x
Paravina, R.D., Ghinea, R., Herrera, L.J., Bona, A.D., Igiel, C., Linninger, M., et al. (2015) Color Differ-ence Thresholds in Dentistry. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 27, S1-S9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12149
Tejada-Casado, M., Pérez, M.M., Della Bona, A., Lübbe, H., Ghinea, R. and Herrera, L.J. (2024) Chro-ma-Dependence of CIEDE2000 Acceptability Thresholds for Dentistry. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 36, 469-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13153
Rashid, F., Farook, T.H. and Dudley, J. (2023) Digital Shade Matching in Dentistry: A Systematic Review. Dentistry Journal, 11, Article No. 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11110250
Nayak, V.M., Sulaya, K. and Ven-katesh, S.B. (2024) Current Trends in Digital Shade Matching—A Scoping Re-view. Japanese Dental Science Review, 60, 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.10.001
Paravina, R.D., Pérez, M.M. and Ghinea, R. (2019) Acceptability and Perceptibility Thresholds in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical and Research Applications. Journal of Es-thetic and Restorative Dentistry, 31, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12465
Cocking, C., Cevirgen, E., Helling, S., Oswald, M., Corcodel, N., Rammelsberg, P., et al. (2009) Colour Compatibility between Teeth and Dental Shade Guides in Quinquage-narians and Septuagenarians. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 36, 848-855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02003.x
Floriani, F., Jurado, C.A., Abuhammoud, S., Vargas, M., Fischer, N.G., Rojas-Rueda, S., et al. (2024) A Comparative Study of Shade-Matching Reproducibility Using an Intraoral Scan-ner and a Spectrophotometer. Dentistry Journal, 12, Article No. 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12030062
Alvarado-Lorenzo, A., Cri-ado-Pérez, L., Cano-Rosás, M., Lozano-García, E., López-Palafox, J. and Al-varado-Lorenzo, M. (2024) Clinical Comparative Study of Shade Measurement Using Two Methods: Dental Guides and Spectrophotometry. Biomedicines, 12, Article No. 825. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12040825
Tieh, M.T., Waddell, J.N. and Choi, J.J.E. (2022) Optical Properties and Color Stability of Denture Teeth—A Systematic Review. Journal of Prosthodontics, 31, 385-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13429
Ehsani, M., Sadighpour, L., Geramipanah, F., Ehsani, A. and Shahabi, S. (2022) Color Stability of Differ-ent Denture Teeth Following Immersion in Staining Solutions. Frontiers in Den-tistry, 19, Article No. 6. https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v19i6.8551
Motayagheni, R., Ebrahim Ad-hami, Z., Taghizadeh Motlagh, S.M., Mehrara, F. and Yasamineh, N. (2020) Col-or Changes of Three Different Brands of Acrylic Teeth in Removable Dentures in Three Different Beverages: An in Vitro Study. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects, 14, 159-165. https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2020.034