全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

The Application of Portfolio-Based Formative Assessment in Senior High School English Writing Teaching: An Empirical Study

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1113679, PP. 1-19

Subject Areas: Pedagogy

Keywords: Formative Assessment, Senior High School English Writing, Instructional Effectiveness, Writing Proficiency, Student Attitudes

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of formative assessment in senior high school English writing teaching, with a focus on its impact on students’ writing competence and their attitudinal acceptance. Adopting a quasi-experimental design, the research selected two second-year classes from a provincial high school in Z Province in China as participants. The experimental group underwent a one-month formative assessment intervention in writing instruction, while the control group maintained conventional teaching approaches. Data were collected through pre-test and post-test continuation writing tasks and questionnaires, with subsequent statistical analysis conducted using SPSS software. Results revealed statistically significant improvements in the experimental group’s writing performance compared to the control group in post-test assessments. Moreover, students demonstrated positive perceptions towards formative assessment activities, acknowledging their efficacy in enhancing writing proficiency. These findings suggest that formative assessment serves as an effective pedagogical approach for developing English writing competence among senior high school students, offering both theoretical implications and practical value for the innovation of writing instruction methodologies in EFL contexts.

Cite this paper

Sun, Y. (2025). The Application of Portfolio-Based Formative Assessment in Senior High School English Writing Teaching: An Empirical Study. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e13679. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113679.

References

[1]  Liu, Q.L. and Wang, Y.L. (2024) Investigating the Effects of English Continuation Writing Tasks on Senior High School Stu-dents’ Creative Thinking. Foreign Language Education in China, 7, 54-61, 93.
[2]  Sadler, D.R. (1989) Formative Assess-ment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00117714
[3]  Scriven, M. (1991) Evaluation Thesaurus. Sage Publications.
[4]  Bloom, B.S., et al. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company Inc.
[5]  Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Edu-cation: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
[6]  Shepard, L.A. (2005) Formative Assessment: Caveat Emptor. Educational Psychologist, 40, 75-86.
[7]  Vygotsky, L.S. (1986) Thought and Lan-guage. MIT Press.
[8]  Boston, C. (2002) The Concept of Formative Assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evalu-ation, 8, 9.
[9]  Abu-Zaid, A. (2013) Formative Assessments in Medical Education: A Medical Graduate’s Perspective. Per-spectives on Medical Education, 2, 358-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-013-0089-5
[10]  Jafari, A. and Kaufman, C. (2006) Handbook of Research on ePortfolios. Idea Group.
[11]  Bitner, M.J. and Brown, S.W. (2008) The Service Impera-tive. Business Horizons, 51, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.09.003
[12]  Cooper, T. and Love, T. (2007) e-Portfolios in E-Learning. Informing Science Press.
[13]  Bryant, L.H. and Chittum, J.R. (2013) ePortfolio Effectiveness: A Search for Empirical Support. International Journal of ePortfolio, 3, 189-198.
[14]  Oskam, I.F. (2009) T-Shaped Engineers for Interdisciplinary Innovation: An Attractive Perspective for Young People as Well as a Must for Innovative Organizations. SEFI (European Society of Engineering Education) Annual Conference, Rotterdam, 1-4 July 2009, 2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/216353140_Tshaped_engineers_ for_interdisciplinary_innovation_an_attractive_perspective_for_young_ people_as_well_as_a_must_for_innovative_organisations
[15]  Klenowski, V., Askew, S. and Carnell, E. (2006) Portfolios for Learning, Assessment and Professional Development in Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500352816
[16]  Creswell, J.W. (2018) Research De-sign: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
[17]  Ministry of Education of the Peo-ple’s Republic of China (2020) General Senior High School Curriculum Standards English. People’s Education Press.
[18]  Li, Y.L. and Tian, X.C. (2018) An Empirical Research into the Reliability of iWrite 2.0. Modern Educational Technology, 28, 75-80.
[19]  Grant, H. and Yang, H.Z. (2001) A Guide to Language Testing: Development, Evaluation, and Research. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
[20]  Liu, J.D. and Yu, Q. (2024) Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learn-ing in Foreign Language Education. Modern Foreign Languages (Bimonthly), 47, 702-711.
[21]  Zhou, L. and Zhou, W.Y. (2020) Formative Assessment: Promoting Students’ Self-Regulated Abilities. Journal of Shanghai Educational Research, No. 2, 53-57.

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133