全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Informing and Whistleblowing in Education: Constructing a Classroom Moral Platform

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1113656, PP. 1-5

Subject Areas: Sociology

Keywords: Informing and Whistleblowing, Procedural Justice, Classroom Moral Plat-form

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Informing and whistleblowing behavior in education displays differentiated characteristics across age groups, with clear variations in motives, methods, and purposes. This paper argues that the destructive impact of whistleblowing on classroom interpersonal relationships does not stem from its motives, but rather from whether teachers guide such behavior toward institutionalized norms. By introducing the principle of procedural justice and establishing standardized channels for whistleblowing, it is possible to balance order maintenance and privacy protection, integrating students’ whistleblowing needs with the classroom system. However, institutional improvement must rely on the endogenous construction of a classroom moral platform. On the one hand, democratic consultation can transform whistleblowing into public participation; on the other, moral internalization education—through theme-based class meetings, situational simulations, and other activities—can reshape an ethic of “mutual-assistance-based supervision”, promoting the transformation from rule authority to value consensus. This study proposes that only by integrating institutional safeguards based on procedural justice with the construction of a democratic moral platform can classroom governance shift from “passive whistleblowing” to “autonomous management”.

Cite this paper

Chen, Y. (2025). Informing and Whistleblowing in Education: Constructing a Classroom Moral Platform. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e3656. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113656.

References

[1]  Liu, Q. (2019) Analysis of Students’ “Informing” Phenomenon and the Shaping of “Decent” Class Culture. Teaching and Management, No. 3, 71-73.
[2]  Bai, X. (2016) A Legal Social History Study of Informant Phenomenon in Ancient China. Journal of Shanxi Normal University (Social Science Edition), 1, 5.
[3]  Liu, J. (1999) Research on Teacher-Child Interac-tion Behavior. Nanjing Normal University Press.
[4]  Zhang, R. and Yang, Y. (2013) Tattling Behavior and Coping Strate-gies of Middle Class Preschoolers. Young Literati, No.1, 119.
[5]  Yang, C. (2007) Research on Tattling Behavior of 4-7-Year-Old Children. Nanjing Normal University.
[6]  Jin, S. (2013) What Kind of Educational Equality Do We Expect to Achieve. Journal of Soochow University, No. 1, 4.
[7]  Zhai, N. (2019) Education Should Not Cultivate Informants. China Moral Education, No. 3, 9-10.
[8]  Yu, F. (2008) Pros and Cons of “Informant Culture” in Class Management. China Educa-tion Innovation Herald, No. 32, 218.
[9]  Li, L. (2013) Commentary on Taiwan Campus Bullying Prevention Guidelines. World Education Information, 26, 66-68.
[10]  Guo, G. (2010) Class Rules Are Useless. Hubei Education (Comprehensive Information), 1, 4.
[11]  Sun, Y. (2018) Harnessing the Positive Effects of Student Tattling. New Class Teacher, No. 10, 23.
[12]  Hou, X. (2005) Moral Education Theme Class Meetings: A Platform for Classroom Moral Education. School Party Building and Ideological Education (Second Half), No. 9, 67-68.

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133