全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

A New Approach to Industrial Censuses and Surveys for Southern African Countries—A Case of Zimbabwe

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1113652, PP. 1-16

Subject Areas: Combinatorial Mathematics

Keywords: Producers of Statistics, Users of Statistics, Industrial Censuses, Industrial Surveys, Response Rate, Data Suppliers

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The purpose of the research was to identify problems which leads to poor response rates in industrial censuses and surveys in Southern Africa countries particularly in Zimbabwe. The research was necessitated by the fact that the statistics generated by producers of statistics in Zimbabwe do not really shows the true picture of what is happening in industrial activities. Producers of statistics had admitted that, it was hard to get data from industries and this then defeats their relevance in society. The research pointed out that, it is necessary for producers of statistics to be in partnership with the industry as most of the industries do not really understand the importance of industrial data to policy formulation and research. The research also pointed out, the need to remove fear of unknown on industrial data suppliers. In addition, the research also pointed out that, producers of statistics need also to prepare for data collection both in budget wise as well as in the use of qualified and well-trained data collectors.

Cite this paper

Munyaradzi, C. T. (2025). A New Approach to Industrial Censuses and Surveys for Southern African Countries—A Case of Zimbabwe. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e3652. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113652.

References

[1]  Krishnan, T.N. and Poulose, S. (2016) Response Rate in Industrial Surveys Conducted in India: Trends and Implications. IIMB Man-agement Review, 28, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2016.05.006
[2]  Rogelberg, S.G. and Stanton, J.M. (2007) Introduc-tion. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106294693
[3]  Avemegah, E., Gu, W., Abulbasher, A., Koci, K., Ogunyiola, A., Eduful, J., et al. (2020) An Examination of Best Practices for Survey Research with Agricul-tural Producers. Society & Natural Resources, 34, 538-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2020.1804651
[4]  Baruch, Y. and Holtom, B.C. (2008) Survey Response Rate Levels and Trends in Organizational Research. Human Relations, 61, 1139-1160.
[5]  Pielsticker, D.I. and Hiebl, M.R.W. (2019) Survey Response Rates in Family Business Research. European Man-agement Review, 17, 327-346.
[6]  Fulton, B.R. (2014) Organizational Surveys: Using Response Enhancing Techniques and Con-ducting Nonresponse Analyses. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014, Article ID: 14059. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.162
[7]  Holtom, B., Baruch, Y., Aguinis, H. and A Ballinger, G. (2022) Survey Response Rates: Trends and a Validity Assessment Framework. Human Relations, 75, 1560-1584. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211070769
[8]  UNIDO (2010) Industrial Statistics: Guidelines and Methodology. United Na-tions.
[9]  CZI (2018) Manufacturing Sector Survey: Import Substitution Value Addition and Export Promotion. CZI.
[10]  Fulton, B.R. (2016) Organizations and Survey Research: Implementing Response Enhancing Strategies and Conducting Nonresponse Anal-yses. Sociological Methods & Research, 47, 240-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115626169
[11]  Leitner, W.D. (1979) A Study of Factors That Influence Response Rate Using a Questionnaire on Questionnaires. American Educational Research.
[12]  Kano, M., Franke, T., Afifi, A.A. and Bourque, L.B. (2008) Adequacy of Reporting Results of School Surveys and Nonresponse Effects: A Re-view of the Literature and a Case Study. Educational Researcher, 37, 480-490. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x08326859
[13]  Sigman, R., Lewis, T., Yount, N.D. and Lee, K. (2014) Does the Length of Fielding Period Matter? Examining Response Scores of Early versus Late Responders. Journal of Official Statistics, 30, 651-674. https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0042
[14]  Baruch, Y. and Holtom, B.C. (2008) Survey Response Rate Levels and Trends in Organi-zational Research. Human Relations, 61, 1139-1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
[15]  Wiseman, F. (2009) The Effects of the Initial Mode of Contact on the Response Rate and Data Quality in an Internet-Based College Satisfaction Survey. Methodological Innovations Online, 4, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/205979910900400202
[16]  Friedman, E.M., Hartzell, M. and Clusen, N.A. (2014) The Net Effect: A Comparison of Internet and Mail Survey Respondents. ResearchGate.
[17]  Saunders, M.N.K. (2011) Web versus Mail: The Influence of Survey Distribution Mode on Employees’ Response. Field Methods, 24, 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x11419104

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133