全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Multinormativity as Philosophy of Law: A View from Brazil

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1112765, PP. 1-20

Subject Areas: Law

Keywords: Law, Pluralism, Democracy, Diversity, Multinormativity

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

This text shows how the tradition of legal pluralism may help one to construct a democratic view of law in a culturally diverse country as Brazil. A multinormative view of law may be able to include social demands from the most diverse social agents and groups, averting the violence linked to homogenizing and centralized conceptions of law. This article also argues that it is not necessary to break up with the tradition of liberal law to conceive a multinormative model of law that opens space for the coexistence of various forms of community life. It is enough to reformulate its institutions to include the demands of all citizens and social groups in the form of normative orders, using the Western tradition as a “hybrid universalizing code” intended to deal with the conflicts between them, a code with formal qualities that should change as it must be responsive to social conflicts.

Cite this paper

Rodriguez, J. R. (2025). Multinormativity as Philosophy of Law: A View from Brazil. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e2765. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1112765.

References

[1]  Neumann, F.L. (1936) O império do direito (Translated by Melo, R.S.). Martins Fontes.
[2]  Hobbes, T. (1968) Leviathan. Pelican Books.
[3]  Cover, R. (2003) Derecho, narración y violencia: Poder construtivo y poder destructivo en la interpretación judicial. GEDISA.
[4]  Terra, R. (2004) Kant e o Direito. Zahar.
[5]  Rodriguez, J.R. (2018) Perversion of Law Six Cases. Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft, 101, 127-149. https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2018-2-127
[6]  Lefebvre, G. (1789) O surgimento da Revolução Francesa. Paz e Terra, 182.
[7]  Vouvelle, M. (2020) A Revolução Francesa (1789-1799). UNESP, 67.
[8]  Queiroz, M. (2023) Constitucionalismo Brasileiro e o Atlantico Negro. Lumen Juris.
[9]  Rodriguez, J.R. (2014) Como Decidem as Cortes? Para uma crítica do direito (brasileiro). Editora FGV.
[10]  Grimberg, K. (2001) Código Civil e Cidadania. Zahar.
[11]  Rodriguez, J.R. (2009) Fuga do Direito: Um estudo sobre o direito contemporaneo a partir de Franz Neumann. Saraiva.
[12]  Hacking, I. (1999) Por que a linguagem interessa à Filosofia? Cambridge University Press.
[13]  Neumann, F.L. (2014) A mudança de função da lei no direito da sociedade burguesa. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos, 109, 2 13-87. https://doi.org/10.9732/P.0034-7191.2014v109p13
[14]  Zaffaroni, E.R. (2011) La Pachammama y el humano. Colihue-Ediciones Madres da Mayo.
[15]  Marshall, T.H. (1991) Citizenshiph and Social Class. Pluto Press.
[16]  de Carvalho, J.M. (2021) A Cidadania no Brasil: O longo caminho. Civilização Brasileira.
[17]  Rodriguez, J.R. (2019) Direito das Lutas. LiberArs.
[18]  Segato, R.L. (2021) La Nación y sus otros. Prometeo.
[19]  Wachowicz, M. (2004) Propriedade Intelectual do Software e Revolução da Tecnologia da Informação. Juruá.
[20]  Tamanaha, B.Z. (2021) Legal Pluralism Explained: History, Theory, Conse-quences. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190861551.001.0001
[21]  Günther, K. (2020) Normative Legal Pluralism: A Critique. In: Fabra-Zamora, J.L., Ed., Jurisprudence in a Globalized World, Edward Elgar, 84-99. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974424.00012
[22]  Luxemburg, R. (2008) A centralização e o autogoverno. In: Luxemburg, R., Ed., A questão nacional e a autonomia, Oficina de Livros, 107-140.
[23]  Leal, V.N. (2012) Coronelismo, enxada e voto. Companhia das Letras.
[24]  Marshall, T.H. (2021) Cidadania, Classe Social, Status. UNESP.
[25]  Zhouri, A. and Valencio, N. (2014) For an Overview of Brazilian Socio-Environmental Conflicts and the Permanence of a Developmentalist Economic Model That Threatens the Environment and the Survival of Traditional Communities. Formas de matar de morrer e de resistir. Limites da resolução negociada de conflitos ambientais. Editora UFMG.
[26]  Günther, K. (2008) Legal Pluralism or Uniform Concept of Law? Globalization as a Problem of Legal Theory. Journal of Extreme Legal Positivism, 5, 5-21.
[27]  Kennedy, D. (2016) A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400880591
[28]  Benhabib, S. (2006) Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183221.001.0001
[29]  Rodriguez, J.R. (2011) Propriedade intelectual e conhecimentos tradicionais. Secretaria de Assuntos Legislativos do Ministério da Justiça do Brasil.
[30]  da Cunha, M.C. (2017) Cultura com aspas e outros ensaios. UBU.
[31]  Bermann, P.S. (2018) Global Legal Pluralism as a Normative Project. University of California Irvine Law Review, 8, 149-171. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3288690
[32]  Dworkin, R. (2014) Império do direito. Martins Fontes.
[33]  Silveira, E.D. and da Silveira, S.A.D. (2012) Direito fundamental à educação indígena. Juruá.
[34]  Ilich, I. (2018) Sociedade sem Escolas. Editora Vozes.
[35]  Azevedo, E. (2005) O Orfeu de Carapinha. Editora da UNICAMP.
[36]  Flores, M.P. and Rodriguez, J.R. (2008) Dogmática e controvérsias religiosas à luz de Robert Cover. A recusa de transfusão sanguínea por parte das Testemunhas de Jeová. Juris Poiesis, 21, 52-83. https://doi.org/10.5935/2448-0517.20180014
[37]  Ilich, I. (1973) La convivialité. éditions du Seuil, 48.
[38]  Costa, S. (2019) The Neglected Nexus between Conviviality and Inequality. Novos Estudos—CEBRAP, 38, 15-32. https://doi.org/10.46877/costa.2019.17
[39]  Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political. Routledge.
[40]  Illich, I. (1975) Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health. Calder & Boyars.
[41]  Tamanaha, B.Z. (2017) A Realistic Theory of Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979778
[42]  Tamanaha, B.Z. (2009) Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide. The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831982
[43]  Nourse, V. and Schaffer, G. (2009) Varieties of New Legal Realism. Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory? Cornell Law Review, 95, 61-138.
[44]  Ferraz Jr., T. (2014) O direito entre o futuro e o passado. Noeses.
[45]  Warat, L.A. (1997) Introdução geral ao direito III. O direito não estudado pela teoria jurídica moderna. Sérgio Antônio Fabris, 140.
[46]  Amado, J. (2009) A revolta dos “Mucker”. Editora Unisinos.
[47]  Lucas, I. (2021) Viagem ao País do Futuro. Cepe Editora.

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133