A realistic model of reservoir fluid samples is essential before conducting reservoir simulations, especially for gas condensate reservoirs. Errors in PVT modeling typically stem from three main sources: fluid sampling, fluid property measurement, and fluid model construction. This work presents a rapid method for constructing a more realistic PVT fluid model before tuning. Three fluid samples from different Iranian gas condensate reservoirs were selected to achieve this. A suitable equation of state (EOS) and appropriate correlations for key factors like critical pressure, temperature, acentric factor, and binary interaction coefficients were chosen using sensitivity and risk analysis techniques. The optimal default selection of a PVT model produces a representative model of the real fluid sample with minimal variation in variables when matching laboratory data. This approach is applicable to various PVT modeling packages. Before model optimization, a base model is selected based on literature and experience. The sensitivity and risk analysis technique uses the residual mean square (RMS) error as the objective function. The results of this work indicate that a significant number of models constructed using the derivative method had lower RMS errors compared to the base model. The risk analysis technique is shown to provide the best default selection for the PVT fluid model. While some approaches in the literature recommend using specific EOS and correlations for gas condensate samples, the results of this work show that the interaction effect of PVT model variables leads to the best combination of EOS and correlations for each PVT sample. This approach can be extended to improve the PVT modeling process.
Cite this paper
Motahhari, S. M. , Bagherian, A. and Safarzadeh, M. A. (2024). Rapid PVT Model Improvement Using Risk Analysis Technique in Gas Condensate Reservoirs. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e2498. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1112498.
Yang, Y., Lun, Z., Wang, R., Cui, M. and Hu, W. (2024) A New Model Simulating the Development of Gas Condensate Reser-voirs. Energy Geoscience, 5, Article ID: 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2022.100149
Shelepov, K., Struchkov, I., Poltoranin, V., Trusova, A., Chashchin, M., Kuzevanov, M., et al. (2018) Reservoir Development Aspects and Surface Facilities Design of Gas Condensate Fields with Oil Rims (Russian). SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Moscow, 15-17 October 2018. https://doi.org/10.2118/191572-18RPTC-MS
Nagarajan, N.R., Honarpour, M.M. and Sampath, K. (2007) Reservoir-Fluid Sampling and Characterization—Key to Efficient Reservoir Management. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 59, 80-91. https://doi.org/10.2118/103501-jpt
Kamari, A., Mohammadi, A.H. and Ram-jugernath, D. (2019) Characterization of C7 Fraction Properties of Crude Oils and Gas-Condensates Using Data Driven Models. Petroleum Science and Technology, 37, 1516-1522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2019.1570254
Suwono, S.B., Hendraningrat, L., Febrianto, D.H., Nugroho, B. and Marhaendrajana, T. (2012) Multiple EOS Fluid Characterization for Modeling Gas Condensate Reservoir with Different Hydrodynamic System: A Case Study of Senoro Field. North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, Cairo, 20-22 Feb-ruary 2012. https://doi.org/10.2118/150822-ms
Schebetov, A., Rimoldi, A. and Piana, M. (2010) Quality Check of Gas-Condensate PVT Studies and EOS Modelling under Input Data Uncertainty (Russian). SPE Russian Oil and Gas Confer-ence and Exhibition, Moscow, 26-28 October 2010.
Whitson, C.H., Fevang, Ø. and Yang, T. (1999) Gas Condensate PVT—What’s Really Important and Why? IBC Conference-Optimisation of Gas Condensate Fields, London, 28-29 January 1999.
Corre, B., Thore, P., Feraudy, V. and Vincent, G. (2000). Integrated Uncertainty Assessment for Project Eval-uation and Risk Analysis. Proceedings of SPE European Petroleum Conference, Paris, October 2000, SPE-65205-MS. https://doi.org/10.2523/65205-ms
Suslick, S.B. and Schiozer, D.J. (2004) Risk Analysis Applied to Petroleum Explo-ration and Production: An Overview. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 44, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2004.02.001