Climatic change has compelled constructors, workers and governments to look for new and innovative technologies to reduce the impact of human activities on Earth. Residential green buildings can offer an alternative to conventional green buildings. These buildings reduce the effect of the building industry on the environment by adopting features and measures that reduce GHGs as well as heat emissions. The current study is focused on evaluating the role of such residential buildings in increasing awareness regarding sustainability in the UK. This study adopted a survey-based approach that targeted the occupants of residential green buildings in the UK to achieve its objectives. This study determined the impact of green design features and sustainable building practices on occupants’ awareness regarding sustainability. Encouragement to adopt an eco-friendly lifestyle was the most important impact. In terms of the perception of occupants about benefits and drawbacks, lower maintenance cost was the most prominent benefit while increased construction cost was the most important drawback. The current awareness status of occupants was also determined. Occupants were most well aware of energy-efficient lighting and BREEAM certification while they were least aware of workshops regarding the use of green technologies. Lastly, it was determined that organizing events like Earth Day and using digital displays were the most efficient modes of promotion while publishing sustainable reports was the least efficient. Hence, green buildings can effectively increase awareness regarding sustainability among their occupants while organizing events, which can be the most effective mode of promotion.
Cite this paper
Khaliq, H. , Baeroom, A. A. , Shahzad, F. , Ullah, A. , Abid, M. A. and Saif, F. (2024). Fostering Sustainability Consciousness:？The Role of Green Buildings in？the United Kingdom. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e2393. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1112393.
Keleş, A.E., Önen, E. and Górecki, J. (2022) Determination of Green Building Awareness: A Study in Türkiye. Sustainability, 14, Article No. 11943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911943
Allen, J.G., MacNaughton, P., Laurent, J.G.C., Flanigan, S.S., Eitland, E.S. and Spengler, J.D. (2015) Green Buildings and Health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 2, 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-015-0063-y
Houghton, A. and Castillo-Salgado, C. (2017) Health Co-Benefits of Green Building Design Strategies and Community Resilience to Urban Flooding: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, Article No. 1519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121519
Sinha, A., Gupta, R. and Kutnar, A. (2013) Sustainable Development and Green Buildings. Drvna Industrija, 64, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.5552/drind.2013.1205
Chegut, A., Eichholtz, P. and Kok, N. (2013) Supply, Demand and the Value of Green Buildings. Urban Studies, 51, 22-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013484526
Bond, S.A. and Devine, A. (2015) Certification Matters: Is Green Talk Cheap Talk? The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 52, 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-015-9499-y
Liu, T., Chen, L., Yang, M., Sandanayake, M., Miao, P., Shi, Y., et al. (2022) Sustainability Considerations of Green Buildings: A Detailed Overview on Current Advancements and Future Con-siderations. Sustainability, 14, Article No. 14393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114393
Mandley, S., Harmsen, R. and Worrell, E. (2015) Identifying the Potential for Resource and Embodied Energy Savings within the UK Building Sector. Energy and Buildings, 86, 841-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.044
Rosenow, J., Guertler, P., Sor-rell, S. and Eyre, N. (2018) The Remaining Potential for Energy Savings in UK Households. Energy Policy, 121, 542-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.033
Melnikovas, A. (2018) Towards an Explicit Research Methodology: Adapting Research Onion Model for Futures Studies. Journal of Futures Studies, 23, 29-44.
Alharahsheh, H.H. and Pius, A. (2020) A Review of Key Paradigms: Positivism Vs Interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 39-43.
Overmars, K.P., Verburg, P.H. and Veldkamp, T. (2007) Comparison of a Deductive and an Induc-tive Approach to Specify Land Suitability in a Spatially Explicit Land Use Model. Land Use Policy, 24, 584-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.09.008
Azungah, T. (2018) Qualitative Research: Deductive and Induc-tive Approaches to Data Analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 18, 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-d-18-00035
Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A. and Bristow, A. (2016) Under-standing Research Philosophy and Approaches to Theory Development. Pearson Education.
John, G., Clem-ents-Croome, D., & Jeronimidis, G. (2005) Sustainable Building Solutions: A Review of Lessons from the Natural World. Building and Environment, 40, 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.05.011
Coelho, A. and de Brito, J. (2012) Influence of Construction and Demolition Waste Management on the Environmental Impact of Buildings. Waste Management, 32, 532-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.011
Zuo, J. and Zhao, Z. (2014) Green Building Research-Current Status and Future Agenda: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.021
Mwasha, A., Williams, R.G. and Iwaro, J. (2011) Modeling the Perfor-mance of Residential Building Envelope: The Role of Sustainable Energy Performance Indicators. Energy and Buildings, 43, 2108-2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.013
Eichholtz, P., Kok, N. and Quigley, J.M. (2013) The Economics of Green Building. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00291
Berardi, U., GhaffarianHoseini, A. and GhaffarianHoseini, A. (2014) State-of-the-Art Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of Green Roofs. Applied Energy, 115, 411-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.047
Wu, S.R., Greaves, M., Chen, J. and Grady, S.C. (2016) Green Buildings Need Green Occupants: A Research Framework through the Lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Architectural Science Re-view, 60, 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2016.1197097
Umar, U.A. and Khamidi, M.F. (2012) Deter-mined the Level of Green Building Public Awareness: Application and Strategies. International Conference on Civil, Offshore and Environmental Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, 12-14 June 2012.
Yeheyis, M., Hewage, K., Alam, M.S., Eskicioglu, C. and Sadiq, R. (2012) An Overview of Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Canada: A Lifecycle Analysis Ap-proach to Sustainability. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 15, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6
Dwaikat, L.N. and Ali, K.N. (2016) Green Buildings Cost Premium: A Review of Empirical Evidence. Energy and Buildings, 110, 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.11.021
Boud, D. and Soler, R. (2015) Sustainable Assessment Revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 400-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
GhaffarianHoseini, A., Dahlan, N.D., Berardi, U., Ghaffari-anHoseini, A., Makaremi, N. and GhaffarianHoseini, M. (2013) Sustainable Energy Performances of Green Buildings: A Re-view of Current Theories, Implementations and Challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.010
Khoshbakht, M., Gou, Z. and Dupre, K. (2018) Energy Use Characteris-tics and Benchmarking for Higher Education Buildings. Energy and Buildings, 164, 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.001
