This paper explores linguistic features used by Kenyans on X by examining the role of hashtags in showcasing Kenyans on X as an imagined community of language users. #RutoMustGo and #RejectFinanceBill were selected for this study. The paper was guided by the objective to examine linguistic features used by Kenyans on X. This paper used multimodality theory to analyze how different modes of communication—such as texts, images, hashtags and emojis—interact to create meaning and shape discourse. It showed how Kenyans on X create social identities by expressing themselves through a variety of semiotic resources. It helped understand how different modes work together to shape and reflect Kenyans on X social identity. This theory helped to unravel how Kenyans on X form a collective identity through language and hashtag usage. Data was elicited from tweets under the two hashtags and analyzed using content analysis method. Purposive sampling technique was used where only tweets that showed how language used by Kenyans on X help in forming an imagined community of language users were selected for this study. Qualitative research design was used for this paper. A total of 47 tweets were used. Findings revealed that Kenyans on X use a variety of linguistic features that showcase them as a community of language users. Hashtags play an important role in activism and uniting Kenyans on X as a community.
Cite this paper
Njuki, E. , Mbaka, N. and Atieno, C. (2024). Hashtag Activism: Examining #RutoMustGo and #RejectFinanceBill in Showcasing Kenyans on X as an Imagined Community of Language Users. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e2256. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1112256.
Gumperz, J. (1999) Language and Social Identity. In: Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. and Coulthard, M., Eds., Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Routledge, 37-47.
Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2010) Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Oppor-tunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Thorne, S.L., Sauro, S. and Smith, B. (2015) Technologies, Identities, and Expressive Activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190514000257
Kim, D. and Vorobel, O. (2015) Discourse Communities: From Origins to Social Media. In: Wortham, S., Kim, D. and May, S., Eds., Discourse and Education, Springer International Publishing, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02322-9_33-1
Marwick, A.E. and Boyd, d. (2010) I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
Hanna, R., Rohm, A. and Crittenden, V.L. (2011) We’re All Connected: The Power of the Social Media Ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54, 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.007
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. (1979) An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In: Austin, W.G. and Worchel, S., Eds., The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Brooks/Cole Publishing, 33-47.
Haslam, S., Oakes, P., Turner, J. and McGarty, C. (1995) Social Identity, Self-Categorization and the Perceived Homogeneity of Ingroups and Outgroups: The Interaction between Social Motivation and Cognition. In: Sorrentino, R.M. and Higgins, E.T., Eds., Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, Vol. 3. The Interpersonal Context, The Guilford Press, 182-222.
Altman, M. (2017) Tufekci, Z.: Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. VOL-UNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29, 884-885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9927-0