All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

ViewsDownloads

Hashtag Activism: Examining #RutoMustGo and #RejectFinanceBill in Showcasing Kenyans on X as an Imagined Community of Language Users

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1112256, PP. 1-24

Subject Areas: Linguistics

Keywords: Imagined Communities of Language, Hashtag, Activism, X, Social Identity, Linguistic Features

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

This paper explores linguistic features used by Kenyans on X by examining the role of hashtags in showcasing Kenyans on X as an imagined community of language users. #RutoMustGo and #RejectFinanceBill were selected for this study. The paper was guided by the objective to examine linguistic features used by Kenyans on X. This paper used multimodality theory to analyze how different modes of communication—such as texts, images, hashtags and emojis—interact to create meaning and shape discourse. It showed how Kenyans on X create social identities by expressing themselves through a variety of semiotic resources. It helped understand how different modes work together to shape and reflect Kenyans on X social identity. This theory helped to unravel how Kenyans on X form a collective identity through language and hashtag usage. Data was elicited from tweets under the two hashtags and analyzed using content analysis method. Purposive sampling technique was used where only tweets that showed how language used by Kenyans on X help in forming an imagined community of language users were selected for this study. Qualitative research design was used for this paper. A total of 47 tweets were used. Findings revealed that Kenyans on X use a variety of linguistic features that showcase them as a community of language users. Hashtags play an important role in activism and uniting Kenyans on X as a community.

Cite this paper

Njuki, E. , Mbaka, N. and Atieno, C. (2024). Hashtag Activism: Examining #RutoMustGo and #RejectFinanceBill in Showcasing Kenyans on X as an Imagined Community of Language Users. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e2256. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1112256.

References

[1]  Gumperz, J. (1999) Language and Social Identity. In: Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. and Coulthard, M., Eds., Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Routledge, 37-47.
[2]  Luluk, J. (2013) Discourse Community and Language Choice: A Study of Language Choice in a Gay Community in Malang. Indonesia.
[3]  Spolsky, B. (1998) Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
[4]  Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Na-tionalism. Verso Books.
[5]  Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2010) Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Oppor-tunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
[6]  Thorne, S.L., Sauro, S. and Smith, B. (2015) Technologies, Identities, and Expressive Activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190514000257
[7]  Kim, D. and Vorobel, O. (2015) Discourse Communities: From Origins to Social Media. In: Wortham, S., Kim, D. and May, S., Eds., Discourse and Education, Springer International Publishing, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02322-9_33-1
[8]  Marwick, A.E. and Boyd, d. (2010) I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
[9]  Hanna, R., Rohm, A. and Crittenden, V.L. (2011) We’re All Connected: The Power of the Social Media Ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54, 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.007
[10]  Marwick, A. and Lewis, R. (2017) Media Manipulation and Disinfor-mation Online. Data & Society Research Institute.
[11]  Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. (1979) An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In: Austin, W.G. and Worchel, S., Eds., The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Brooks/Cole Publishing, 33-47.
[12]  Haslam, S., Oakes, P., Turner, J. and McGarty, C. (1995) Social Identity, Self-Categorization and the Perceived Homogeneity of Ingroups and Outgroups: The Interaction between Social Motivation and Cognition. In: Sorrentino, R.M. and Higgins, E.T., Eds., Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, Vol. 3. The Interpersonal Context, The Guilford Press, 182-222.
[13]  Altman, M. (2017) Tufekci, Z.: Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. VOL-UNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29, 884-885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9927-0
[14]  Boyd, D. (2014) It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press.
[15]  Bhayani, R. and Huang, L. (2009) Twitter Sentiment Classification Using Distant Supervision. CS224N Project Report, Stanford, 1-12.
[16]  Pradyumn, M. (2018) Systematic Review of Literature Using Twitter as a Tool. M.A Thesis. East Carolina University.
[17]  Scribbr (2023) Origin of KOT. https://nation.africa/kenya/weekly-review/ramaverick-how-we-founded-the-powerful-kenyans-on-twitter-movement--4297680

Full-Text


Contact Us

[email protected]

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133