全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Comparison of the Flexural Strength and Elastic Modulus of Conventional, Milled and 3D-Printed Interim Restorative Materials Subjected to Different Intervals of Accelerated Aging

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1111959, PP. 1-14

Subject Areas: Dentistry

Keywords: Interim Restoration, CAD/CAM Milled, 3D-Printing, Flexural Strength, Elastic Modulus, Accelerated Aging

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Aim: To compare the flexural strength and elastic modulus of different interim restorative materials subjected to different intervals of accelerated aging. Materials and Method: Three groups of interim restorative materials (N = 120) were prepared using three different manufacturing techniques: conventional PMMA resin (Jet Tooth Shade), computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milled resin blocks (Telio CAD), and three-dimensional (3D) printed resin (Crown & Bridge NextDent). The specimens from each group were subdivided into four equal subgroups (n = 10) and subjected to accelerated aging through thermocycling and brushing according to different time intervals of aging (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months). The flexural strength and elastic modulus were measured using a three-point bending test. The data were analyzed using two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA), one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s post hoc test at a significance level of 0.05. Results: At baseline, the flexural strength and elastic modulus were significantly greater in the CAD/CAM milled group (p < 0.05) than in the conventional and 3D-printed groups. However, no significant difference in flexural strength was observed between the conventional and 3D-printed groups. However, a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the elastic modulus was observed between the conventional and 3D-printed groups. At all aging intervals (3, 6 and 12 months), the flexural strength and elastic modulus were significantly greater (p < 0.05) in the CAD/CAM milled group than in the conventional group and the 3D-printed group. Within each material tested, the baseline group had significantly greater values (p < 0.05) than did the other age groups. However, there was no significant difference observed among the age intervals of 3, 6, and 12 months, except for the CAD/CAM milled group. In the 12-month aging group, a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the elastic modulus was found; no significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between the 3 and 6-month aging groups. Conclusion: The CAD/CAM milled group consistently outperformed the conventional and 3D-printed groups in all age intervals. Therefore, the CAD/CAM milling technique could be recommended for long-term temporization for patients with increased occlusal forces, such as parafunctional habits, or for full-arch implant-supported interim prostheses.

Cite this paper

Abu-Obaid, A. I. , Alotaibi, A. M. , Binmeqren, A. F. , Albarrak, R. A. , Albaqami, M. S. and Alshahrani, A. S. (2024). Comparison of the Flexural Strength and Elastic Modulus of Conventional, Milled and 3D-Printed Interim Restorative Materials Subjected to Different Intervals of Accelerated Aging. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e1959. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111959.

References

[1]  Shillingburg, H.T. (1997) Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 3rd Edition, Quintessence Publishing.
[2]  Moulding, M.B., Loney, R.W. and Ritsco, R.G. (1994) Marginal Accuracy of Provisional Restorations Fabricated by Different Techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 7, 468-472.
[3]  Mehrpour, H., Farjood, E., Giti, R., Ghasrdashti, A.B. and Heidari, H. (2016) Evaluation of the Flexural Strength of Interim Restorative Materials in Fixed Prosthodontics. Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, 17, 201-206.
[4]  Gratton, D.G. and Aquilino, S.A. (2004) Interim Restorations. Dental Clinics of North America, 48, 487-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.007
[5]  Saisadan, D., Manimaran, P. and Meenapriya, P. (2016) In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Temporary Restorative Materials Used in Fixed Partial Denture. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 8, S105-S109.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.191936
[6]  Miura, S., Fujisawa, M., Komine, F., Maseki, T., Ogawa, T., Takebe, J., et al. (2019) Importance of Interim Restorations in the Molar Region. Journal of Oral Science, 61, 195-199. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.19-0102
[7]  Peng, C., Chung, K. and Ramos, V. (2019) Assessment of the Adaptation of Interim Crowns Using Different Measurement Techniques. Journal of Prosthodontics, 29, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13122
[8]  Nejatidanesh, F., Momeni, G. and Savabi, O. (2009) Flexural Strength of Interim Resin Materials for Fixed Prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthodontics, 18, 507-511.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2009.00473.x
[9]  Digholkar, S., Madhav, V.N.V. and Palaskar, J. (2016) Evaluation of the Flexural Strength and Microhardness of Provisional Crown and Bridge Materials Fabricated by Different Methods. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 16, 328-334.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.191288
[10]  O’Brien, W.J. (2008) Dental Materials and Their Selection. 4th Edition, Quintessence Publishing.
[11]  Çakmak, G., Yilmaz, H., Aydoğ, Ö. and Yilmaz, B. (2020) Flexural Strength of CAD-CAM and Conventional Interim Resin Materials with a Surface Sealant. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 124, 800.e1-800.e7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.004
[12]  Balkenhol, M., Ferger, P., Mautner, M. and Wostmann, B. (2007) Provisional Crown and Fixed Partial Denture Materials: Mechanical Properties and Degree of Conversion. Dental Materials, 23, 1574-1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.024
[13]  Balkenhol, M., Knapp, M., Ferger, P., Heun, U. and Wöstmann, B. (2008) Correlation between Polymerization Shrinkage and Marginal Fit of Temporary Crowns. Dental Materials, 24, 1575-1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.001
[14]  Myagmar, G., Lee, J., Ahn, J., Yeo, I.L., Yoon, H. and Han, J. (2021) Wear of 3D Printed and CAD/CAM Milled Interim Resin Materials after Chewing Simulation. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 13, 144-151.
https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.144
[15]  van Noort, R. (2012) The Future of Dental Devices Is Digital. Dental Materials, 28, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
[16]  Alt, V., Hannig, M., Wöstmann, B. and Balkenhol, M. (2011) Fracture Strength of Temporary Fixed Partial Dentures: CAD/CAM versus Directly Fabricated Restorations. Dental Materials, 27, 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.012
[17]  Rayyan, M.M., Aboushelib, M., Sayed, N.M., Ibrahim, A. and Jimbo, R. (2015) Comparison of Interim Restorations Fabricated by CAD/CAM with Those Fabricated Manually. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 114, 414-419.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.007
[18]  Scotti, C.K., de Amoêdo Campos Velo, M.M., Rizzante, F.A.P., de Lima Nascimento, T.R., Mondelli, R.F.L. and Bombonatti, J.F.S. (2020) Physical and Surface Properties of a 3D-Printed Composite Resin for a Digital Workflow. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 124, 614.e1-614.e5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.029
[19]  Berli, C., Thieringer, F.M., Sharma, N., Müller, J.A., Dedem, P., Fischer, J., et al. (2020) Comparing the Mechanical Properties of Pressed, Milled, and 3D-Printed Resins for Occlusal Devices. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 124, 780-786.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.024
[20]  Lee, W., Lee, D. and Lee, K. (2017) Evaluation of Internal Fit of Interim Crown Fabricated with CAD/CAM Milling and 3D Printing System. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 9, 265-270. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.265
[21]  Al-Qahtani, A.S., Tulbah, H.I., Binhasan, M., Abbasi, M.S., Ahmed, N., Shabib, S., et al. (2021) Surface Properties of Polymer Resins Fabricated with Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing Techniques. Polymers, 13, Article 4077.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234077
[22]  Tian, Y., Chen, C., Xu, X., Wang, J., Hou, X., Li, K., et al. (2021) A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning, 2021, Article 9950131. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9950131
[23]  Atay, A. and Sagirkaya, E. (2020) Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Mechanical Properties of CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. The Internet Journal of Dental Science, 22, 83-96.
[24]  Eliasson, S.T. and Dahl, J.E. (2020) Effect of Thermal Cycling on Temperature Changes and Bond Strength in Different Test Specimens. Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry, 7, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1709470
[25]  Gale, M.S. and Darvell, B.W. (1999) Thermal Cycling Procedures for Laboratory Testing of Dental Restorations. Journal of Dentistry, 27, 89-99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00037-2
[26]  Harper, R.H., Schnell, R.J., Swartz, M.L. and Phillips, R.W. (1980) In Vivo Measurements of Thermal Diffusion through Restorations of Various Materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 43, 180-185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90185-7
[27]  Alageel, O., Alsadon, O., Almansour, H., Alshehri, A., Alhabbad, F. and Alsarani, M. (2022) Assessment of Effect of Accelerated Aging on Interim Fixed Dental Materials Using Digital Technologies. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 14, 360-368. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.360
[28]  Ribeiro, A.K.C., de Freitas, R.F.C.P., de Carvalho, I.H.G., de Miranda, L.M., da Silva, N.R., de Fátima Dantas de Almeida, L., et al. (2023) Flexural Strength, Surface Roughness, Micro-CT Analysis, and Microbiological Adhesion of a 3D-Printed Temporary Crown Material. Clinical Oral Investigations, 27, 2207-2220.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04941-3
[29]  Taşın, S. and Ismatullaev, A. (2022) Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Thermocycling on the Mechanical Properties of Conventionally Polymerized, CAD-CAM Milled, and 3D-Printed Interim Materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 127, 173.e1-173.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.020
[30]  Pantea, M., Ciocoiu, R.C., Greabu, M., Ripszky Totan, A., Imre, M., Țancu, A.M.C., et al. (2022) Compressive and Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed and Conventional Resins Designated for Interim Fixed Dental Prostheses: An in Vitro Comparison. Materials, 15, Article 3075. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093075
[31]  Kawano, F., Ohguri, T., Ichikawa, T. and Matsumoto, N. (2001) Influence of Thermal Cycles in Water on Flexural Strength of Laboratory‐Processed Composite Resin. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 28, 703-707.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00724.x
[32]  Monteiro, B. and Spohr, A.M. (2015) Surface Roughness of Composite Resins after Simulated Toothbrushing with Different Dentifrices. Journal of International Oral Health, 7, 1-5.
[33]  Jain, V., Platt, J.A., Moore, K., Spohr, M.A. and Borges, G.A. (2013) Color Stability, Gloss, and Surface Roughness of Indirect Composite Resins. Journal of Oral Science, 55, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.55.9
[34]  Ellakany, P., Fouda, S.M., Mahrous, A.A., AlGhamdi, M.A. and Aly, N.M. (2022) Influence of CAD/CAM Milling and 3D-Printing Fabrication Methods on the Mechanical Properties of 3-Unit Interim Fixed Dental Prosthesis after Thermo-Mechanical Aging Process. Polymers, 14, Article 4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194103
[35]  Yao, J., Li, J., Wang, Y. and Huang, H. (2014) Comparison of the Flexural Strength and Marginal Accuracy of Traditional and CAD/CAM Interim Materials before and after Thermal Cycling. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 112, 649-657.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.012
[36]  Reeponmaha, T., Angwaravong, O. and Angwarawong, T. (2020) Comparison of Fracture Strength after Thermo-Mechanical Aging between Provisional Crowns Made with CAD/CAM and Conventional Method. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 12, 218-224. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.4.218
[37]  Al-Humood, H., Alfaraj, A., Yang, C., Levon, J., Chu, T.G. and Lin, W. (2023) Marginal Fit, Mechanical Properties, and Esthetic Outcomes of CAD/CAM Interim Fixed Dental Prostheses (FDPs): A Systematic Review. Materials, 16, Article 1996.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051996
[38]  Karaokutan, I., Sayin, G. and Kara, O. (2015) In Vitro Study of Fracture Strength of Provisional Crown Materials. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 7, 27-31.
https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.1.27
[39]  Astudillo-Rubio, D., Delgado-Gaete, A., Bellot-Arcís, C., Montiel-Company, J.M., Pascual-Moscardó, A. and Almerich-Silla, J.M. (2018) Mechanical Properties of Provisional Dental Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE, 13, e0193162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193162
[40]  Sari, T., Usumez, A., Strasser, T., Şahinbas, A. and Rosentritt, M. (2020) Temporary Materials: Comparison of in Vivo and in Vitro Performance. Clinical Oral Investigations, 24, 4061-4068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03278-5
[41]  Alzahrani, S.J., Hajjaj, M.S., Azhari, A.A., Ahmed, W.M., Yeslam, H.E. and Carvalho, R.M. (2023) Mechanical Properties of Three-Dimensional Printed Provisional Resin Materials for Crown and Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Systematic Review. Bioengineering, 10, Article 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060663
[42]  Reymus, M., Fabritius, R., Keßler, A., Hickel, R., Edelhoff, D. and Stawarczyk, B. (2019) Fracture Load of 3D-Printed Fixed Dental Prostheses Compared with Milled and Conventionally Fabricated Ones: The Impact of Resin Material, Build Direction, Post-Curing, and Artificial Aging—An in Vitro Study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 24, 701-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02952-7
[43]  Piedra-Cascón, W., Krishnamurthy, V.R., Att, W. and Revilla-León, M. (2021) 3D Printing Parameters, Supporting Structures, Slicing, and Post-Processing Procedures of Vat-Polymerization Additive Manufacturing Technologies: A Narrative Review. Journal of Dentistry, 109, Article 103630.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103630
[44]  Väyrynen, V.O.E., Tanner, J. and Vallittu, P.K. (2016) The Anisotropicity of the Flexural Properties of an Occlusal Device Material Processed by Stereolithography. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 116, 811-817.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.018
[45]  Hwangbo, N., Nam, N., Choi, J. and Kim, J. (2021) Effects of the Washing Time and Washing Solution on the Biocompatibility and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Dental Resin Materials. Polymers, 13, Article 4410.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244410
[46]  Sadek, H.M.A. and El‐Banna, A. (2023) Biaxial Flexural Strength of Different Provisional Restorative Materials under Chemo‐Mechanical Aging: An in Vitro Study. Journal of Prosthodontics, 33, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13662

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133