全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

An Analysis of the Interpersonal Functions of Self-Projection Based on Systemic Functional Linguistics

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1111950, PP. 1-13

Subject Areas: Linguistics

Keywords: Self-Projection, Interpersonal Function, Interpersonal Interaction, Systemic Functional Linguistics

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Self-projection belongs to the projection system of semantic category. Based on the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics, this paper interprets the interpersonal functions of self-projection. Firstly, it gives an introduction to the types of self-projection from transitive process and ‘the exchanged’, and then discusses the multi-dimensional interpersonal functions of self-projection from Modal and Mood system. This analysis indicates that self-projection in Modal category follows polite principle and represents such interpersonal functions as judgment, evaluation or intersubjectivity in an explicit/implicit way, while self-projection in Mood category follows desirability principle and performs the interpersonal functions including question, command or statement from rank-scale and delicacy scale through declarative mood variants. It is hoped to provide a different perspective and entry point to effectively deconstruct and construct the interpersonal interaction based on the speaker’s point of view.

Cite this paper

Wang, G. (2024). An Analysis of the Interpersonal Functions of Self-Projection Based on Systemic Functional Linguistics. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e1950. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111950.

References

[1]  Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd Edition, Hodder.
[2]  Thompson, G. (2004) Introducing Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.
[3]  Urmson, J.O. (1952) Parenthetical Verbs. Mind, LXI, 480-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXI.244.480
[4]  Martin, J.R. and Rose, D. (2003) Working with Discourse. Continuum.
[5]  Stubbs, M. (1986) A Matter of Prolonged Fieldwork: Notes towards a Modal Grammar of English. Ap-plied Linguistics, 7, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.1.1
[6]  Lakoff, G. (1972) Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Jour-nal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 458-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262952
[7]  Palmer, F.R. (1986) Mood and Modal-ity. Cambridge University Press.
[8]  Peng, J.W. (2001) A Cognitive Pragmatic Analysis of Language Report in English and Chinese. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, No. 5, 359-366.
[9]  Li, Z.Z. (2001) Interpersonal Meanings of Epis-temic Modality in Academic Discourse. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, No. 5, 353-357.
[10]  Zeng, L. (2007) “Projection” in Academic Discourse: From the Perspective of Grammatical Metaphor. Foreign Language Research, No. 3, 46-49.
[11]  Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd Edi-tion, Edward Arnold.
[12]  Wang, G.L. (2019) An Exploratory Analysis on the Se-mantic Character of Projecting Verbal Group Complex. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, No. 4, 9-15.
[13]  Leech, G. (1983) Principle of Pragmatics. Longman.
[14]  Huang, G.W. (2000) Systemic Functional Linguistics: Forty Years on. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, No. 1, 15-21.
[15]  Wang, G.L. (2014) Rank-Shift Phenomenon in Projecting System. Foreign Languages Re-search, No. 5, 7-11.

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133