全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Analysis of the Cultural Connotations of “Guo Liang Tian” (In Two Days) from the Perspective of Face Theory in Social Psychology

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1111944, PP. 1-15

Subject Areas: Psychology, Sociology

Keywords: Guo Liang Tian (In Two Days), Social Psychology, Face Theory, Interactions, Chinese Culture

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

This paper explores the deep meanings and functions of the expression “Guo Liang Tian” (过两天 literally “In Two Days”) within Chinese culture from a social psychological perspective, particularly through the lens of face theory. The study finds that “Guo Liang Tian”, as an ambiguous temporal expression, is widely used to avoid direct refusals and to maintain both personal and others’ face, thereby promoting social harmony. Although this expression is broadly accepted in Chinese culture, it may cause misunderstandings and communication barriers in cross-cultural interactions. To mitigate these issues, strategies such as enhancing cultural sensitivity, specifying exact times, using double confirmation, and building trust are essential. This paper analyzes the social psychological functions of “Guo Liang Tian” in linguistic communication and its impact on interpersonal communication and social behavior patterns.

Cite this paper

Zhang, X. and Zhang, H. (2024). Analysis of the Cultural Connotations of “Guo Liang Tian” (In Two Days) from the Perspective of Face Theory in Social Psychology. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e1944. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111944.

References

[1]  Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage Publica-tions.
[2]  Ting-Toomey, S. (1988) Communicating across Cultures. Guilford Press.
[3]  Fei, X.T. (1991) From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society. Sanlian Publishing House. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912489
[4]  Wang, H. (2010) The Rise of Modern Chinese Thought. Sanlian Publishing House.
[5]  Homans, G.C. (1958) Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
[6]  Blau, P.M. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. John Wiley & Sons.
[7]  Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620766
[8]  Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Aldine Publishing Company.
[9]  Hall, E.T. (1976) Beyond Culture. Anchor Press.
[10]  Triandis, H.C. (1995) Individualism & Collectiv-ism. Westview Press.
[11]  Hu, H.C. (1944) The Chinese Concept of “Face”. American Anthropologist, 46, 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1944.46.1.02a00040
[12]  Hwang, K.-K. (1987) Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944-974. https://doi.org/10.1086/228588
[13]  Zhai, X.W. (1994) Face, Favor, and Guanxi Networks. Henan People’s Publishing House.
[14]  Bond, M.H. (1991) Beyond the Chinese Face: Insights from Psychology. Oxford Universi-ty Press.
[15]  Huang, L. (1999) Family Communication Patterns and Personality Characteristics. Communication Quarterly, 47, 230-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909370136
[16]  Levine, R. and Norenzayan, A. (1999) The Pace of Life in 31 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 178-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022199030002003

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133