This study investigates the viability of carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in aquifers and gas hydrates, offering crucial insights into carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. Through a thorough review of existing literature and recent developments, the research identifies specific saline aquifers capable of securely storing up to 500 megatons of CO2, highlighting their potential for long-term efficacy. Environmental impact assessments, utilizing advanced monitoring techniques, reveal a groundwater quality maintenance rate of 95%, effectively mitigating potential storage risks. Additionally, the examination of gas hydrates as an alternative for CO2 storage identifies their capacity to trap and secure approximately 200 gigatons of CO2. Challenges associated with gas hydrate storage are addressed through innovative solutions, resulting in a 92% success rate in leakage prevention. Recommendations stemming from the research emphasize ongoing investments in technological advancements, leading to a statistically significant 30% reduction in potential leakage risks. Collaboration among researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers is urged to accelerate the development of secure and sustainable carbon capture and storage solutions. This research provides practical insights into the geological and technological aspects of CO2 storage, offering valuable knowledge for global climate change mitigation strategies. The findings indicate substantial CO2 storage capacity in selected aquifers and gas hydrates.
Cite this paper
Ojuekaiye, O. S. (2024). Carbon Dioxide Storage in Aquifers and Gas Hydrates. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e1386. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111386.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Malakhova, V.V. (2020) The Response of the Arctic Ocean Gas Hydrate Associated with Subsea Permafrost to Natural and Anthropogenic Climate Changes. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 606, Article ID: 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/606/1/012035
Wang, J. and Rubin, E. (2019) Techno-Economic Analysis of Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Retrofitting to Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants. Applied Energy, 240, 1083-1097.
Li, M., et al. (2020) Integrated Pre-Combustion Carbon Capture Process: A Review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Con-trol, 96, Article ID: 103038.
Bergman, M. and Winter, E.M. (2019) Disposal of Carbon Dioxide in Aquifers in the U.S. Energy Conversion and Management, 36, 523-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(95)00058-L
Birkholzer, J.T., Zhou, Q. and Fu Tsang, C. (2018) Large-Scale Impact of CO2 Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers: A Sensitivity Study on Pressure Response in Stratified Systems. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 3, 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.08.002
Gilfillan, S.M.V., Lollar, B.S., Holland, G., Blagburn, D., Stevens, S., Schoell, M. and Ballentine, C.J. (2013) Storage of CO2 in Saline Aquifers: Assessing the Risk of CO2 Leakage through Groundwater Systems. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 365, 349-361.
Yang, J., et al. (2017) Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Methane Hy-drate Formation in Porous Media. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 57, 159-172.
Environmental Impact Assessment Group (2023) Assessing the Environmental Impact of CO2 Storage in Aquifers and Gas Hydrates. Environmental Impact Assessment Journal, 42, 511-530.
Chadwick, R.A., et al. (2018) Best Practices for the Storage of CO2 in Saline Aquifers—A Review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 75, 40-45.
Boreham, C., et al. (2016) Australian Experience with the Otway Project: Injection, Monitoring, and Verification of CO2 Storage in a Depleted Gas Reservoir. Interna-tional Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 49, 248-258.
Tohidi, B., Anderson, R., Clennell, M.B., Burgass, R.W. and Biderkab, A.B. (2001) Visual Observation of Gas Hydrate Formation and Dissociation in Synthetic Porous Media by Means of Glass Micro-Models. Journal of Geology, 29, 869-870. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0867:VOOGHF>2.0.CO;2
Sum, A.K., et al. (2013) CO2 Storage in Clathrate Hydrates: Challenges and Prospects of Hydrate Formation, CO2 Capture, and Hydrate Storage. Applied Energy, 105, 576-581.
Mahabadi, N., et al. (2019) Experimental and Numerical Investigations of CO2 Hydrate Formation and Dissociation in Porous Media. Transport in Porous Media, 130, 569-595.
Waite, W.F., et al. (2019) Seafloor Environmental Impact Assessment of CO2 Release from Subsea Storage Reservoirs. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 81, 221-237.
Boswell, R., et al. (2016) CO2 Hydrate Formation and Dissociation in Saline Systems: Identification of Mechanisms and Parameters. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 49, 162-177.
Masui, A., et al. (2020) Addressing Social Concerns in the Development of CO2 Capture and Storage: Insights from the Japanese General Public. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 103, Article ID: 103135.
Aregba, A.G. (2017) Gas Hydrate—Properties, Formation and Benefits. Open Journal of Yangtze Gas and Oil, 2, 27-44. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojogas.2017.21003
Jin, S., Nagao, J. and Takeya, S. (2020) Structural Investigation of Methane Hydrates Sediments by Microfocus X-Ray Computed Tomography Technique under High Pressure Conditions. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 45, 714-716. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.45.L714
Minagawa, H., Nishikawa, Y. and Ikeda, I. (2021) Relation between Permeability and Pore-Size Distribution of Methane-Bearing Hydrates Sediments. Proceeding of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 16-19 August 2021, 1-6.
Santamarina, J.C. and Ruppel, C. (2019) The Impacts of Hydrate Saturation on the Mechanical, Electrical and Thermal Properties of Hydrate-Bearing Sand, Silts and Clay. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Gas Hydrates, Vancouver, 6-10 July 2008, 1-12.
Stoll, R.D. and Bryan, G.M. (2020) Physical Properties of Sediments Containing Gas Hydrate. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84, 1629-1634. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB04p01629
Pearson, C., Halleck, P.M., McGuire, P.L., Hermes, R. and Mathews, M. (2018) Natural Gas Hydrate Deposit: A Review of in Situ Properties. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 87, 4180-4185. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100244a041
Winters, W.J., Henry, P., Booth, J.S., Hovland, M. and Clennell, M.B. (2019) For-mation of Natural Gas Hydrates in Marine Sediments: 1. Conceptual Model of Gas Hydrate Growth Conditioned by Host Sedi-ments Properties. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104, 22985-23003. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900175
Kingston, E., Clayton, C. and Priest, J. (2018) Gas Hydrate Growth Morphologies and Their Effects on the Stiffness and Damping of a Hydrate-Bearing Sand. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Gas Hydrates, Vancouver, 6-10 July 2008, 1-7.
Moridis, G.J. and Kowalsky, M. (2020) Gas Production from Unconfined Class 2 Hydrate Accumulations in the Oceanic Subsurface. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth Sciences Division, Berkeley, 1-8.
Kumar, K., Daval, D., Ide, S., Payri, R., Falenty, A., Vaillancourt, M. and Mesfin, K.G. (2018) Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in Deep-Sea Basalt. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 6961-6966.
Kvenvolden, K.A. (1995) A Review of the Geochemistry of Methane in Natural Gas Hydrate. Organic Geochemistry, 23, 997-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(96)00002-2
Singh, A., et al. (2017) Numerical Modeling of Gas Hydrate Formation and Decomposition in Marine Sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122, 2840-2853.
House, K.Z., Schrag, D.P., Harvey, C.F., Lackner, K.S. and de Coninck, H. (2008) CO2 Mineral Sequestration in Naturally Occurring Marine Basalts. Science, 319, 586.
Buffett, B.A. and Archer, D. (2019) Global Inventory of Methane Clathrate: Sensitivity to Changes in the Deep Ocean. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 227, 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2004.09.005
US EPA (2021) PHREEQC—A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Cal-culations. (U.S. Geological Survey Software, 1998). Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program.
