全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Exploring the Recognition of Dogs as Sentient Beings: Understanding the Evolution of Dog Psychology

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1110780, PP. 1-19

Subject Areas: Neuroscience, Veterinary Medicine, Animal Behavior

Keywords: Dogs, Sentience, Companionship, Emotional Depth, Recognition

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Dogs have a profound history of companionship with humans, evolving from utilitarian tools to cherished sentient beings deserving empathy and consideration. This study explores the transformation of society's perception of dogs from historical, scientific, and philosophical viewpoints. Objectives: This study sought to achieve three main objectives: 1) explore historical and cultural perspectives on dog sentience, 2) analyse scientific evidence supporting the concept of dog sentience, and 3) investigate philosophical arguments concerning the moral worth of dogs. Methods: A systematic review methodology was employed, involving rigorous steps, such as database selection, search queries, criteria for inclusion/exclusion, screening, data extraction, synthesis, quality assessment, and reporting. Ethical approval was not deemed necessary because the study analysed publicly available literature. Results: 1) Historical and Cultural Perspectives: The paper examines how ancient civilisations revered dogs as symbols of loyalty, protection, and companionship. It also explores how Eastern and Western cultures have recognised and valued dogs throughout history, emphasising their deep-rooted connections to human societies. 2) Scientific Evidence: Scientific research highlights dogs' impressive cognitive abilities, emotional intelligence, and critical thinking skills. Neuroscientific studies have revealed the neural correlates of dog emotions, social cognition, and communication, thus providing evidence for their complex inner lives. 3) Philosophical Perspectives: Philosophical arguments on animal ethics and the moral status of dogs challenge the traditional views of animals as property. They advocate for the moral consideration, rights, and protection of dogs based on their consciousness, emotions, and social interactions. Conclusion: The recognition of dogs as sentient beings evolved through the interplay of historical, cultural, and societal influences. Understanding these multifaceted perspectives enriches our appreciation of the human-dog bond and underscores their responsibility to ensure their well-being and ethical treatment. This study contributes to a growing body of knowledge advocating the recognition and protection of dogs as valued members of our shared existence.

Cite this paper

Torrance, J. (2023). Exploring the Recognition of Dogs as Sentient Beings: Understanding the Evolution of Dog Psychology. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e780. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110780.

References

[1]  Miklosi, A. (2014) Dog Behaviour, Evolution, and Cognition.
[2]  University of South Australia (n.d.) Guides: Systematic Reviews: Extraction. https://guides.library.unisa.edu.au/SystematicReviews/DataExtraction
[3]  Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. http://www.prisma-statement.org/
[4]  Gautier, A. (2007, July) Dogs and People in Social, Working, Economic or Symbolic Interaction. Lynn M. Snyder, Elizabeth A. Moore. Journal of Anthropological Research, 63, 277-279. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.63.2.20371159
[5]  Homer, H. (2015) The Odyssey. Xist Publishing, Rosenberg.
[6]  Cohen, S. (2017, December 9) Ars Simia Naturae: The Animal as Mediator and Alter Ego of the Artist in the Renaissance. Explorations in Renaissance Culture, 43, 202-231. https://doi.org/10.1163/23526963-04302004
[7]  Ji, R. (2020, November 2) “Filial Piety” in the Analects of Confucius and “Filial Piety” in Today’s Society. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 4, 15-18. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v4i10.1556
[8]  Sah, R. (2016) The Socio-Cultural Importance of the Worship of Shiva as Bhairava in the Kumaun Himalayas: A Historical Study of the Astha Bhairav Worship in Almora. Quest-The Journal of UGC-HRDC Nainital, 10, 236-242. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-0035.2016.00033.4
[9]  Stewart, J. (2017) Dharma Dogs: Can Animals Understand the Dharma? Textual and Ethnographic Considerations. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 24, 39-62.
[10]  Singh, S. and Nakamura, H. (2022) India-Japan Cultural Syncretism Reflected in Japanese Pantheon of Deities.
[11]  Larson, G. (2021, October 29) The Question of Canine Origins. Science, 374, 541. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl7976
[12]  Amyx, D.A. (2017) The Effects of Values, Advertising Characteristics, and Animal Companion Preference on Consumer Attitudes and Purchase. In: Creating Marketing Magic and Innovative Future Marketing Trends: Proceedings of the 2016 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference, Springer International Publishing, Berlin, 65-82.
[13]  Pregowski, M.P. (2015, November 16) Your Dog Is Your Teacher: Contemporary Dog Training Beyond Radical Behaviorism. Society & Animals, 23, 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341383
[14]  Piotti, P., Albertini, M., Trabucco, L.P., Ripari, L., Karagiannis, C., Bandi, C. and Pirrone, F. (2021, July 20) Personality and Cognitive Profiles of Animal-Assisted Intervention Dogs and Pet Dogs in an Unsolvable Task. Animals, 11, Article No. 2144. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072144
[15]  Kerepesi, A., Dóka, A. and Miklósi, D. (2015, January) Dogs and Their Human Companions: The Effect of Familiarity on Dog-Human Interactions. Behavioural Processes, 110, 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.005
[16]  Kaminski, J. and Nitzschner, M. (2013, November) Do Dogs Get the Point? A Review of Dog-Human Communication Ability. Learning and Motivation, 44, 294-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2013.05.001
[17]  Arden, R. and Adams, M.J. (2016, March) A General Intelligence Factor in Dogs. Intelligence, 55, 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.01.008
[18]  Fiset, S. and Plourde, V. (2015, November 30) Commentary: Oxytocin-Gaze Positive Loop and the Coevolution of Human-Dog Bonds. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article No. 1845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01845
[19]  Smith, J.G. and Katz, J.S. (2023) Measuring the Dog Side of the Dog-Human Bond. In: Stevens, J.R., Ed., Canine Cognition and the Human Bond, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 69, Springer, Cham, 37-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29789-2_3
[20]  Kujala, M.V. (2017, January 1) Canine Emotions as Seen through Human Social Cognition. Animal Sentience, 14, 13. https://doi.org/10.51291/2377-7478.1114
[21]  Magyari, L., Huszár, Z., Turzó, A. and Andics, A. (2020, December) Event-Related Potentials Reveal Limited Readiness to Access Phonetic Details during Word Processing in Dogs. Royal Society Open Science, 7, Article ID: 200851. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200851
[22]  Buttner, A.P. (2016, December) Neurobiological Underpinnings of Dogs’ Human-Like Social Competence: How Interactions between Stress Response Systems and Oxytocin Mediate Dogs’ Social Skills. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 198-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.029
[23]  Jones, R.C. (2015, October 2) Animal Rights Is a Social Justice Issue. Contemporary Justice Review, 18, 467-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2015.1093689
[24]  Mellor, D. (2014, August 18) Positive Animal Welfare States and Reference Standards for Welfare Assessment. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 63, 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2014.926802
[25]  Caviola, L., Everett, J.A.C. and Faber, N.S. (2019, June) The Moral Standing of Animals: Towards a Psychology of Speciesism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 1011-1029. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000182
[26]  Seonbong, Y. (2015, August) International Discussions for Comprehensive Animal Welfare and Making a Treaty. HUFS Law Review, 39, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.17257/hufslr.2015.39.3.35
[27]  Celermajer, D., Schlosberg, D., Rickards, L., Stewart-Harawira, M., Thaler, M., Tschakert, P., Verlie, B. and Winter, C. (2020, October 7) Multispecies Justice: Theories, Challenges, and a Research Agenda for Environmental Politics. Environmental Politics, 30, 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1827608
[28]  Koplin, J.J. (2019, September) Human-Animal Chimeras: The Moral Insignificance of Uniquely Human Capacities. Hastings Center Report, 49, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1051
[29]  Valentini, L. (2013, January 21) Canine Justice: An Associative Account. Political Studies, 62, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.01006.x
[30]  Bovenkerk, B. and Nijland, H.J. (2017, June) The Pedigree Dog Breeding Debate in Ethics and Practice: Beyond Welfare Arguments. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 30, 387-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9673-8
[31]  Jaworska, A. and Tannenbaum, J. (2013) The Grounds of Moral Status.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413