All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

ViewsDownloads

The Universalities and Particularities of the Chinese-Style Modern Production—Based on the Perspective of Five Characteristics

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1110548, PP. 1-9

Subject Areas: Culture, Economics

Keywords: Modernization, Production, Universality, Specificity, Five Characteristics

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

This paper compares the Chinese-style modern production with that of other countries and analyses its universalities and particularities thoroughly. Firstly, in terms of universalities, China and capitalism share common features such as large-scale socialization, improvement of people’s livelihoods, automation of production, digitization of operations and emphasis on market orientation. Secondly, in terms of specificities, Chinese-style modern production insists on the leadership role of the Communist Party of China, emphasizes the survival and development of the working people, closes the gap between rich and poor to realize common prosperity, pursues the coordination of material and spiritual civilizations, promotes the concepts of harmony between human beings and nature, as well as the concept of a community with a shared future of mankind, which has unique advantages over that of the capitalism. Finally, this paper also puts forward brief suggestions.

Cite this paper

Cai, Z. , Du, C. , Xu, Y. and Yu, W. (2023). The Universalities and Particularities of the Chinese-Style Modern Production—Based on the Perspective of Five Characteristics. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e548. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110548.

References

[1]  Streaming Media. (2022) Best Practices for Streaming in Modern Production Workflows. https://www.streamingmedia.com/Articles/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=156432
[2]  王峰. 如何理解中国式现代化的普遍性和特殊性? [N]. 21世纪经济报道, 2022-10-17(002). https://doi.org/10.28723/n.cnki.nsjbd.2022.004099
[3]  Feng, L. (2023) Theoretical Logic and Historical Logic of Chinese Modernization. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology, 5, 1-7. https://www.clausiuspress.com/assets/default/article/2023/05/30/article_1685445822.pdf
[4]  Hogan, P.C. (2022) Social Emotions, Diversity, and Universality. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 6, 29-32. https://doi.org/10.26613/esic.6.1.266
[5]  Teryayeva, A. (1959) The Upsurge in Socialized Production and Improvement in the Forms of Payment for Labor in the Collective Farms. Problems in Economics, 2, 57-62. https://doi.org/10.2753/PET1061-1991020157
[6]  Tang, D., Li, Y., Zheng, H. and Yuan, X. (2022) Government R&D Spending, Fiscal Instruments and Corporate Technological Innovation. China Journal of Accounting Research, 15, Article ID: 100250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100250
[7]  Zhang, Y. (2022) What’s Really behind China’s “Common Prosperity” Program? New Labor Forum, 31, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/10957960221090978
[8]  Liang, C. (2021) Marx’s Criticism of Secular Judaism-Money Fetishism. Master’s Thesis, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang. https://doi.org/10.27118/d.cnki.ghesu.2021.000685
[9]  Aiguo, H. (2022) Basic Experience of the New Road of Chinese Modernization. Proceedings of the 4th International Modernization Forum, Beijing, 19 August 2022. https://doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2022.031251
[10]  Bai, L., Wei, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, Y. and Lucey, B.M. (2023) Diversification Effects of China’s Carbon Neutral Bond on Renewable Energy Stock Markets: A Minimum Connectedness Portfolio Approach. Energy Economics, 123, Article ID: 106727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106727
[11]  He, W., Yang, Y. and Wei, G. (2022) A Comparative Analysis of China’s Provincial Carbon Emission Allowances Allocation Schemes by 2030: A Resource Misallocation Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 361, Article ID: 132192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132192

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413