All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99


Construction and Implementation of a Blended “Curriculum Ideological Education” Model for Foreign Language Majors

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1110507, PP. 1-8

Subject Areas: Curriculum Development

Keywords: Foreign Language Major, Curriculum Ideological Education, Dual-Line Blending, Implementation Strategies

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


With the continuous development of big data technology and the increasing maturity of online teaching platforms, the blended online and offline teaching model has been accepted by more and more teachers and students due to its clear teaching effects and good learning experience. However, the current blended teaching is mostly applied to the imparting of theoretical knowledge and is rarely seen in “curriculum ideological education” practice. In view of this, this study proposes a blended online and offline “curriculum ideological education” model for foreign language majors based on the systematic analysis of the current research status of ideological education at home and abroad and the necessity of implementing a blended “curriculum ideological education” model. It also proposes strategic suggestions for the construction of the “curriculum ideological education” for foreign language majors from aspects such as offline teaching, online platforms, and extracurricular activities.

Cite this paper

Lou, L. (2023). Construction and Implementation of a Blended “Curriculum Ideological Education” Model for Foreign Language Majors. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e507. doi:


[1]  中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[EB/OL]., 2020-05-28.
[2]  中华人民共和国工业和信息部. 教育部等十部门关于印发《全面推进“大思政课”建设的工作方案》的通知[EB/OL]., 2022-08-31.
[3]  Yang, Y. and Wang, D. (2020) The Realization of Ideological and Political Education in College English Based on Cultural Confidence. Creative Education, 11, 2193-2198.
[4]  Michael, W. (2004) Ideology and Curriculum. Routledge, Abingdon.
[5]  Johnson, D.K. (2016) A Decade of Change in General Education. New Directions for Higher Education, 125, 9-28.
[6]  Thayer, B. (2008) Beyond Liberal Democracy in Schools: The Power of Pluralism. Teachers College Press, New York.
[7]  Edwards, J. (2018) Developing Citizenship in the Curriculum. Routledge, London.
[8]  王友良. 日本思想政治教育之剖析[J]. 南华大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 7(6): 61-64.
[9]  戚静. 高校课程思政协同创新研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2020.
[10]  赵蒙成. 构建“课程思政”生态圈[N]. 中国教育报, 2019-05-07(11).
[11]  刘鹤. 课程思政建设的理性内涵与实施路径[J]. 中国大学教育, 2019(3): 59-62.
[12]  郑佳然. 新时代高校“课程思政”与“思政课程”同向同行探析[J]. 思想教育研究, 2019(3): 94-97.
[13]  陈会方, 秦桂秀. “课程思政”与“思政课程”同向同行的理论与实践[J]. 中国高等教育, 2019(9): 53-55.
[14]  朱飞. 高校课程思政的价值澄清与进路选择[J]. 思想理论教育, 2019(8): 67-72.
[15]  董勇. 论从思政课程到课程思政的价值内涵[J]. 思想政治教育研究, 2018, 34(5): 90-92.
[16]  高燕. 课程思政建设的关键问题与解决路径[J]. 中国高等教育, 2017(15): 11-14.
[17]  高德胜, 聂雨晴. 论马克思主义学院在课程思政改革中的实践价值[J]. 思想政治教育研究, 2020(1): 77-82.
[18]  吴月齐. 试论高校推进“课程思政”的三个着力点[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2018(1): 67-69.
[19]  王芳. “课程思政”建设中发挥思想政治理论课主渠道作用的探索[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2020(6): 35-37.
[20]  Zhang, H. and Yuan, C. (2020) Research on University Students’ Ideological and Political Education in the New Era. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 217-221.
[21]  王永祥, 朱有义. 主体间性教学模式视阈下的大学英语教学改革[M]. 苏州: 苏州大学出版社, 2020.
[22]  张博. 新时代高校“课程思政”建设研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2022.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413