全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Effect of Lignocellulose Waste-Biomass Pretreatment of the Peels of Musa acuminata (Banana) and Ananas comosus (Pineapple) on the Production of Bioethanol via Solid-State Fermentation

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1110130, PP. 1-28

Subject Areas: Chemical Engineering & Technology, Analytical Chemistry, Biological Chemistry, Environmental Chemistry

Keywords: Lignocellulose Biomass, Peels, Musa Acuminate, Ananas Comosus, Pretreatment, Acid, Alkaline, Solid-State Fermentation, Bioethanol

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The use of fruits both domestically and industrially generates waste from their discarded peels which may lead to environmental pollution and contamination. This work aims at evaluating the effects of chemical pre-treatment of biomass on the physicochemical properties and the effects of process parameters on the production of ethanol via solid-state fermentation. The biomass was dried, ground and subjected to chemical pretreatment using H2SO4 and NaOH. pH, total Titratable acidity (TTA), total soluble sugar (TSS), specific gravity (SG), and total reducing sugars (TRS) were carried out before and after the pretreatment of biomass. Acid hydrolysis and neutralisation of the biomass were then carried out before solid-state fermentation. A central composite design (CCD) was used to evaluate the effects of process parameters; fermentation time (X1), pH (X2), and biomass load (X3) on the physicochemical and functional properties of the bioethanol produced. Before pretreatment, the TRS and TSS of pineapple and banana peel biomass were observed to be 16.67 & 5.36% and 8 & 5%Bx respectively. For acid pretreatment, pineapple peel biomass had higher TRS and TSS ranging from 20.69% - 30.0% and 10% - 21%Bx compared to banana peel biomass with TRS and TSS ranging from 14.39% - 21.8% and 9.9% - 14.9%Bx respectively. Whereas, for alkaline pretreatment, pineapple biomass had TRS and TSS ranging from 13.71% - 19.35% and 10% - 17.5%Bx while banana biomass had higher yields of TSS ranging from 10% - 16.5%Bx and TRS ranging from 10.79% - 19.98%. The optimum fermentation conditions for Banana Peel Biomass were fermentation time (48.88 h), pH (6.11), and biomass load (21.96 g/ml); with ethanol conc., density, TRS, and TSS of 2.56%, 1.025 g/ml, 13.93% and 2.59%Bx respectively from Banana biomass pretreated with acid. While for Pineapple Peel Biomass, the optimum conditions were; fermentation time (34.51 h), pH (4.82), and biomass load (24.0 g/ml) with ethanol conc., density, TRS and TSS of 2.42%, 1.015 g/ml, 37.72% and 5.61%Bx respectively from Pineapple biomass pretreated with acid. This study showed that chemical pretreatment has a positive impact on the physicochemical properties of fruit biomass with acid pretreatment being the most effective in the release of sugars and production of bioethanol.

Cite this paper

Evate, N. , Ngwasiri, P. N. , Ambindei, W. A. , Ngwabie, N. M. and Ngassoum, M. B. (2023). Effect of Lignocellulose Waste-Biomass Pretreatment of the Peels of Musa acuminata (Banana) and Ananas comosus (Pineapple) on the Production of Bioethanol via Solid-State Fermentation. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110130.

References

[1]  Demirbas, A. (2011) Competitive Liquid Biofuels from Biomass. Applied Energy, 88, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.07.016
[2]  Hatti-Kaul, R. (2010) Biorefineries—A Path to Sustainability? Crop Science, 50, S-152-S-156. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0563
[3]  Kumar, M., et al. (2018) Exploiting CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA) Class Specificity to Probe Cellulose Microfibril Biosynthesis. Plant Physiology, 177, 151-167. https://academic.oup.com/plphys/article/177/1/151/6116966 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.00263
[4]  Cherubini, F. and Strømman, A.H. (2011) Life Cycle Assessment of Bioenergy Systems: State of the Art and Future Challenges. Bioresource Technology, 102, 437-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.010
[5]  Pathak, P.D., Mandavgane, S.A. and Kulkarni, B.D. (2017) Fruit Peel Waste: Characterization and Its Potential Uses. Current Science, 113, 444-454. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v113/i03/444-454
[6]  Maitan-Alfenas, G.P., Visser, E.M. and Guimarães, V.M. (2015) Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass: Converting Food Waste in Valuable Products. Current Opinion in Food Science, 1, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2014.10.001
[7]  Damayanti, D., et al. (2021) Conversion of Lignocellulose for Bioethanol Production, Applied in Bio-Polyethylene Terephthalate. Polymers, 13, Article No. 2886. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13172886
[8]  Tian, M.L. and Row, K.H. (2013) Separation of Glucose and Bioethanol in Biomass with Current Methods and Sorbents. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 51, 819-824. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23585637
[9]  Tyl, C. and Sadler, G.D. (2017) pH and Titratable Acidity. In: Nielsen, S.S., Ed., Food Analysis, Springer, Berlin, 389-406. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-45776-5_22
[10]  Joshi, V. and Devrajan, A. (2008) Ethanol Recovery from Solid State Fermented Apple Pomace and Evaluation of Physico-Chemical Characteristics of the Residue. Natural Product Radiance, 7, 127-132.
[11]  da Silva, J.I.S., et al. (2021) Simulation of Production of Anhydrous Bioethanol Using Glycerol and 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolyl-Tetrafluoroborate in the Aspen plus Simulator. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14, 323-336.
[12]  Ademiluyi, F.T. and Mepba, H.D. (2013) Yield and Properties of Ethanol Biofuel Produced from Different Whole Cassava Flours. ISRN Biotechnology, 2013, Article ID: 916481. https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/916481
[13]  Victor, A., Titilayo, F.-O. and Daniel, F. (2016) Solid State Fermentation and Bioconversion of Ripe and Unripe Pineapple Peels Using Aspergillus Niger. International Journal of Scientific World, 4, 48-51. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijsw.v4i2.6435
[14]  Nadzirah, K.Z., Zainal, S., Noriham, A., Normah, I., Roha, A.M.S. and Nadya, H. (2013) Physico-Chemical Properties of Pineapple Variety N36 Harvested and Stored at Different Maturity Stages. International Food Research Journal, 20, 225-231. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Physico-chemical-properties-of-pineapple-variety-at-Nadzirah-Zainal/3f00d1adbe8ce88c6959d53c795604d973ce9f40
[15]  Chalchisa, T. and Dereje, B. (2021) From Waste to Food: Utilization of Pineapple Peels for Vinegar Production. MOJ Food Processing & Technology, 9, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojfpt.2021.09.00254
[16]  Priyankara, G.G.D., Karunarathne, C.L.S.M., Sarananda, K.H. and Ariyaratne, M. (2017) Effect of Maturity Stage on Ripening and Quality Characters of Four Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Varieties of Sri Lanka. Tropical Agricultural Research, 28, 496-502. https://doi.org/10.4038/tar.v28i4.8249
[17]  Ariffin, K.K., Masngut, N., Seman, M.N.A., Saufi, S.M., Jamek, S. and Sueb, M.S.M. (2020) Dilute Acid Hydrolysis Pretreatment for Sugar and Organic Acid Production from Pineapple Residues. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 991, Article ID: 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/991/1/012057
[18]  Arumugam, A., Anudakshaini, T.S., Shruthi, R., Jeyavishnu, K., Sundarra Harini, S. and Sharad, J.S. (2020) Low-Cost Production of PHA Using Cashew Apple (Anacardium occidentale L.) Juice as Potential Substrate: Optimization and Characterization. Biomass Convert & Biorefinery, 10, 1167-1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00502-5
[19]  Awe, S. and Nnadoze, S.N. (2015) Production and Microbiological Assessment of Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) Fruit Wine. Microbiology Research Journal International, 8, 480-488. https://doi.org/10.9734/BMRJ/2015/16867
[20]  Qian, E.W. (2014) Pretreatment and Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Biomass. In: Tojo, S. and Hirasawa, T., Eds., Research Approaches to Sustainable Biomass Systems, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 181-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-404609-2.00007-6
[21]  Baruah, J., et al. (2018) Recent Trends in the Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Value-Added Products. Frontiers in Energy Research, 6, Article No. 141. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00141 https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00141
[22]  Modenbach, A.A. and Nokes, S.E. (2014) Effects of Sodium Hydroxide Pretreatment on Structural Components of Biomass.
[23]  Jayanti, A.N., et al. (2018) Bioethanol Production from Sugarcane Molasses by Instant Dry Yeast (Effect of Pretreatment and Fermentation Temperature). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 230, Article ID: 012102.
[24]  Brandão, T., et al. (2017) Characterization of the Jambolan (Syzygium cumini L.) Fruit Wine Processing. BioResources, 12, 7069-7083. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.4.7069-7083
[25]  Galeote, V., et al. (2010) FSY1, a Horizontally Transferred Gene in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118 Wine Yeast Strain, Encodes a High-Affinity Fructose/H Symporter. Microbiology Society. Microbiology (Reading), 156, 3754-3761. https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.041673-0
[26]  Le, H. and Le, V. (2014) Effects of Initial pH Value of the Medium on the Alcoholic Fermentation Performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cells Immobilized on Nipa Leaf Sheath Pieces. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 36, 663-667.
[27]  El-Mekkawi, S.A., Abdo, S.M., Samhan, F. and Ali, G.H. (2019) Optimization of Some Fermentation Conditions for Bioethanol Production from Microalgae Using Response Surface Method. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 43, Article No. 164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0205-8
[28]  Hamouda, H.I., Nassar, H.N., Madian, H.R., Amr, S.S.A. and El-Gendy, N.S. (2015) Statistical Optimization of Batch Ethanol Fermentation of Sugarcane Molasses by Candida tropicalis Strain HSC-24. Biotechnology Research International, 2015, Article ID: 905792. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/905792
[29]  Thorat, P.P., Sadawarte, S.K., Sawate, A.R. and Machewad, G.M. (2017) Studies on Effect of Fermentation on Physicochemical Properties of Vegetables and Preparation of Sauce. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6, 3537-3545. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.423
[30]  Dasgupta, D., et al. (2013) Design and Optimization of Ethanol Production from Bagasse Pith Hydrolysate by a Thermotolerant Yeast Kluyveromyces sp. IIPE453 Using Response Surface Methodology. SpringerPlus, 2, Article No. 159. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-159

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413