全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Ratings of Driving Factors for the Adoption and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109982, PP. 1-20

Subject Areas: Artificial Intelligence, Business Management

Keywords: Privacy and Security, Innovation, Artificial Intelligence, Government, Technology, Best-Worst Method

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The study constructed an estimation of the significance of driving factors that influence artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and implementation in the public sector, and accentuated a critical research area that is currently understudied. A theoretical framework, underpinned by the diffusion of innovation (DOI) theory, was developed from a mingling of the technology, organization, and environment (TOE) framework and the human, organisation, and technology (HOT) fit model. The best-worst method was used to scrutinize and rank the identified driving factors according to their weighted averages. The findings of the study pointed to privacy and security; reliability, serviceability and functionality; regulation; interpretability and ease of use; IT infrastructure and data; and ethical issues as the highest ranked driving factors for AI adoption and implementation in government institutions. The study has significant implications for policy makers and practitioners, as it would augment their perspectives on how to adopt and implement AI innovations.

Cite this paper

Dorhetso, S. N. and Quarshie, B. D. (2023). Ratings of Driving Factors for the Adoption and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e9982. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109982.

References

[1]  Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D. and Bressgott, T. (2020) How Artificial Intelligence Will Change the Future of Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0
[2]  Holzinger, A., Tjoa, A.M. and Kieseberg, P. (2021) Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—A Security, Safety and Privacy Perspective on AI. International Cross-Domain Conference, CD-MAKE 2021, 17-20 August 2021, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84060-0_1
[3]  Lauterbach, A. (2019) Artificial Intelligence and Policy: QuoVadis? Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21, 238-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-09-2018-0054
[4]  Sun, T.Q. and Medaglia, R. (2019) Mapping the Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: Evidence from Public Healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36, 368-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008
[5]  van Noordt, C. and Misuraca, G. (2020) Exploratory Insights on Artificial Intelligence for Government in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 40, 426-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320980449
[6]  Alexopoulos, C., Lachana, Z., Androutsopoulou, A., Diamantopoulou, V., Charalabidis, Y. and Loutsaris, M.A. (2019) How Machine Learning Is Changing e-Government. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance—ICEGOV2019, Melbourne, 3-5 April 2019, 354-363. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326412
[7]  Schrader, D.E. and Ghosh, D. (2018) Proactively Protecting against the Singularity: Ethical Decision Making in AI. IEEE Security and Privacy, 16, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.2701169
[8]  Stock, T. and Seliger, G. (2016) Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 40, 536-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129
[9]  Pandey, S.K., Davis, R.S., Pandey, S. and Peng, S. (2016) Transformational Leadership and the Use of Normative Public Values: Can Employee Be Inspired to Serve Larger Public Purpose? Public Administration, 1, 204-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12214
[10]  Cresswell, A.M. and Sayogo, D.S. (2012) Developing Public Value Metrics for Returns to Government ICT Investments.
[11]  Tornatzky, L. and Fleischer, M. (1990) The Process of Technology Innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington.
[12]  Yusof, N.M., Paul, R.J. and Stergioulas, L.K. (2006) Towards a Framework for Health Information Systems Evaluation. The 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Kauai, 4-7 January 2006, 95a. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.491
[13]  Rogers, E.M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. 4th Edition, Free Press, New York.
[14]  Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. 5th Edition, Free Press, New York.
[15]  Van Noordt, C. and Misuraca, G. (2021) Towards a Systematic Understanding on the Challenges of Procuring Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector.
[16]  Karunasena, K. and Deng, H. (2012) Critical Factors for Evaluating the Public Value of e-Government in Sri Lanka. Government Information Quarterly, 1, 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.005
[17]  Schedler, K., Guenduez, A.A. and Frischknecht, R. (2019) How Smart Can Government Be? Exploring Barriers to the Adoption of Smart Government. Information Polity, 24, 3-20. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180095
[18]  De Vries, H., Bekkers, V. and Tummers, L. (2016) Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, 94, 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
[19]  Abouelmehdi, K., Beni-Hessane, A. and Khaloufi, H. (2018) Big Healthcare Data: Preserving Security and Privacy. Journal of Big Data, 5, Article No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-017-0110-7
[20]  Thesmar, D., Sraer, D., Pinheiro, L., Dadson, N., Veliche, R. and Greenberg, P. (2019) Combining the Power of Artificial Intelligence with the Richness of Healthcare Claims Data: Opportunities and Challenges. PharmacoEconomics, 37, 745-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00777-6
[21]  Nilashi, M., Ahmadi, H., Ahani, A., Ravangard, R. and Ibrahim, O.B. (2016) Determining the Importance of Hospital Information System Adoption Factors Using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (ANP). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 244-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.008
[22]  Morse, R.S. (2010) Integrative Public Leadership: Catalysing Collaboration to Create Public Value. The Leadership Quarterly, 2, 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.004
[23]  Edler, J., Ruhland, S., Hafner, S., Rigby, J., Hommen, L., Rolfstam, M., Charles, E., Tsipouri, L. and Papadakou, M. (2006) Innovation and Public Procurement. Review of Issues at Stake. In Study for the European Commission (No ENTR/03/24). Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe.
[24]  Edquist, C., Hommen, L. and Tsipouri, L. (2000) Public Technology Procurement and Innovation. Vol. 16, Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4611-5
[25]  Bonczek, R.H., Holsapple, C.W. and Whinston, A.B. (2014) Foundations of Decision Support Systems. Academic Press, New York.
[26]  Broring, A., Schmid, S., Schindhelm, C.K., Khelil, A., Kabisch, S., Kramer, D., Le Phuoc, D., Mitic, J., Anicic, D. and Teniente Lopez, E. (2017) Enabling IoT Ecosystems through Platform Interoperability. IEEE Software, 1, 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2017.2
[27]  Vellido, A. (2019) Societal Issues Concerning the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Kidney Diseases, 5, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1159/000492428
[28]  Lee, Y.J. and Park, J.Y. (2018) Identification of Future Signal Based on the Quantitative and Qualitative Text Mining: A Case Study on Ethical Issues in Artificial Intelligence. Quality and Quantity, 52, 653-667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0582-8
[29]  Wang, Z.G., Xu, R., Lin, H. and Wang, R.J. (2019) Energy Performance Contracting, Risk Factors, and Policy Implications: Identification and Analysis of Risks Based on the Best-Worst Network Method. Energy, 170, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.140
[30]  Rezaei, J. (2016) Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method: Some Properties and a Linear Model. Omega, 64, 126-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001
[31]  Fu, J.R., Farn, C.K. and Chao, W.P. (2006) Acceptance of Electronic Tax Filing: A Study of Taxpayer Intentions. Information & Management, 43, 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.04.001
[32]  Yang, Y., Lau, A.K.W., Lee, P.K.C., Yeung, A.C.L. and Cheng, T.C.E. (2018) Efficacy of China’s Strategic Environmental Management in Its Institutional Environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39, 138-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2017-0695
[33]  Dorhetso, S.N. (2023) Ratings of Barriers and Challenges of Financial Technology in a Developing Economy. In: Ahmed, S., Addae, J. and Ofori, K., Eds., Exploring the Dark Side of FinTech and Implications of Monetary Policy, IGI Global, Hershey, 67-92. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6381-9.ch004
[34]  Dorhetso, S.N., Boakye, L.Y. and Amofa-Sarpong, K. (2023) Determinants of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Access to Financial Services in Ghana. In: Sustainable Education and Development—Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation, ARCA 2022, Springer, Cham, 278-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25998-2_21
[35]  Medhora, P.R. (2018) Data Governance in the Digital Age. Special Report, Centre for International Governance Innovation, Waterloo.
[36]  Orji, I.J. and Wei, S. (2016) A Detailed Calculation Model for Costing of Green Manufacturing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116, 65-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2015-0140

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413