全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Research on Influencing Factors and Prediction Methods of Shale Gas Content Based on Machine Learning Algorithm

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109963, PP. 1-16

Subject Areas: Geophysics, Petroleum Geology

Keywords: Shale Gas Content, Influencing Factors, Prediction Method, CatBoost Algorithm, M1 Well

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

In order to serve the research of shale gas reservoir gas content and improve the prediction effect of shale gas reservoir gas content, this paper compares the factors influencing the gas content of shale gas reservoir and general prediction methods, and carries out the analysis of the factors influencing the gas content of shale gas and the response of sensitive logs in M1 well area, determines the main controlling factors of shale gas content, and establishes the prediction model of shale gas content in the well area on this basis. In order to improve the prediction accuracy, the CatBoost algorithm was introduced to build a shale gas content prediction model in the study area and compared with the measured gas content for verification; meanwhile, to verify the applicability of the model, the log data of the neighboring well F1 in the M1 well area were imported into the model to calculate its gas content and compared with its measured gas content for verification. The results show that the main influencing factors of shale gas content in M1 well block are total organic carbon content and pore specific surface area, etc. In the conventional shale gas content prediction model, adsorbed gas and free gas are calculated separately, and the summed gas content is larger than the measured gas content; the highest accuracy of multiple regression analysis is 0.702. The accuracy of the shale gas content prediction model established by applying CatBoost algorithm with well logging and testing data as input features and corresponding measured gas content as output labels is 0.986, which is better than the conventional algorithm; the model also has a higher accuracy in predicting the shale gas content of the neighboring well F1 in M1 well area.

Cite this paper

Mao, F. (2023). Research on Influencing Factors and Prediction Methods of Shale Gas Content Based on Machine Learning Algorithm. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e9963. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109963.

References

[1]  Zhang, J.C., Jin, Z.J. and Yuan, M.S. (2004) Reservoiring Mechanism of Shale Gas and Its Distribution. Natural Gas Industry, 24, 15-18 131-132. (In Chinese)
[2]  Dong, D.Z., Qiu, Z., Zhang, L.F., et al. (2021) Progress on Sedimentology of Transitional Facies Shales and New Discoveries of Shale Gas. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 39, 29-45. (In Chinese)
[3]  Wu, J.S., Yu, B.S. and Li, Y.X. (2012) Adsorption Capacity of Shale Gas and Controlling Factors from the Well Yuye 1 at the Southeast of Chongqing. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 34, 40-48. (In Chinese)
[4]  Jin, P.P., Ou, C.H., Ma, Z.G., et al. (2018) Evolution of Montmorillonite and Its Related Clay Minerals and Their Effects on Shale Gas Development. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 57, 344-355. (In Chinese)
[5]  Zhang, J.Z., Li, X.Q., Zou, X.Y., et al. (2021) Pore Structure Characteristics of a Marine-Continental Coal-Bearing Shale Reservoir and Its Effect on the Shale Gas-Containing Property. Geochimica, 50, 478-491. (In Chinese)
[6]  Zhang, J.C., Liu, S.G., Wei, X.L., et al. (2021) Evaluation of Gas Content in Shale. Oil & Gas Geology, 42, 28-40. (In Chinese)
[7]  Zhang, Z.Q., Sun, J.M., Gong, J.S. and Xia, Z.L. (2015) Gas Content Calculation Model of Shale Gas Reservoir. Lithologic Reservoirs, 27, 5-14. (In Chinese)
[8]  Zhao, J.Z., Shen, C., Ren, L. and Tan, X.C. (2017) Quantitative Prediction of Gas Contents in Different Occurrence States of Shale Reservoirs: A Case Study of the Jiaoshiba Shale Gasfield in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 37, 27-33. (In Chinese)
[9]  Wen, K., Yan, J.P., Zhong, G.H., et al. (2022) New Method of Shale Gas Evaluation of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Changning Area, Southern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 34, 95-105. (In Chinese)
[10]  Nie, H.K. and Zhang, J.C. (2012) Shale Gas Accumulation Conditions and Gas Content Calculation: A Case Study of Sichuan Basin and Its Periphery in the Lower Paleozoic. Acta Geologica Sinica, 86, 349-361. (In Chinese)
[11]  Zhang, Y., Ma, X.D., Li, Y.J. and Cai, J.S. (2021) The Application of Deep Learning to the Shale Gas Content Prediction in Nanchuan (South Sichuan). Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 45, 569-575. (In Chinese)
[12]  Liu, J. and Zhang, M.Y. (2021) Gas-Bearing Property Evaluation by Petrophysical Logging in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Case Study in J Area of Fuling Shale Gas Field,sichuan Basin. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 43, 128-135. (In Chinese)
[13]  Chen, Y.Y., Deng, X.J., Wang, X.L., et al. (2021) Application of a PSO-SVM Algorithm for Predicting the TOC Content of a Shale Gas Reservoir: A Case Study in Well Z in the Yuxi Area. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 60, 652-663. (In Chinese)
[14]  Wang, J.T., Wen, X.T., He, Y.L., Lan, J.L. and Zhang, C.M. (2022) Logging Curve Prediction Based on a CNN-GRU Neural Network. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 61, 276-285. (In Chinese)
[15]  Yang, Z.W., Jiang, Z.X., Liang, Z.K., et al. (2022) Evaluation of Shale TOC Content Based on Two Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Southern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 34, 130-138. (In Chinese)
[16]  Xiao, L.Z. (2022) The Fusion of Data-Driven Machine Learning with Mechanism Models and Interpretability Issues. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 61, 205-212. (In Chinese)
[17]  Zhu, Y.M., Zhang, Q.H., Qu, X.R., et al. (2015) Investigation and Development Potential Evaluation of Deep Shale Gas Resources in Qinshui Basin. Science Press, Beijing, 40-41. (In Chinese)
[18]  Fu, J.J., Guo, S.B., Gao, Q.F. and Yang, J. (2016) Reservoir Characteristics and Enrichment Conditions of Shale Gas in the Carboniferous-Permian Coal-Bearing Formations of Qinshui Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 23, 167-175. (In Chinese)
[19]  Zhao, J.L., Wang, Y.S., Yan, H.P., et al. (2021) Research on Prediction Method of Shale Reservoir Geochemical Parameters Based on Coal Field Logging Data. Progress in Geophysics, 36, 2143-2150. (In Chinese)
[20]  Zhang, Z. (2018) Study on Gas Content Characteristics of Shale Gas Reservoir in the Yushu Community Block of Qinshui Basin. Xi’an Petroleum University, Xi’an. (In Chinese)
[21]  Zhang, B.Y. (2017) Research on Logging Characterization Method of Shale Reservoir Parameters. China University of Geosciences, Beijing. (In Chinese)
[22]  Yu, G. (2016) Comprehensive Interpretation of Shale Gas Geophysics. East China University of Technology Press, Shanghai. (In Chinese)
[23]  Zhang, B.M., Cai, Q.S., Chen, X.H., et al. (2021) Reservoir Characteristics and Gas-Bearing Capacity of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the Well Eyy2, East Huangling Uplift, Western Hubei Province. Geology in China, 48, 1485-1498. (In Chinese)
[24]  Guo, X.S. (2014) Rules of Two-Factor Enrichiment for Marine Shale Gas in Southern China—Understanding from the Longmaxi Formation Shale Gas in Sichuan Basin and Its Surrounding Area. Acta Geologica Sinica, 88, 1209-1218. (In Chinese)
[25]  Li, J.Q., Lu, S.F., Li, W.B. and Cai, J.C. (2021) Evaluation on IN-Situ Gas-Bearing Characteristic of Shale Based on Process Analysis Method. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 43, 42-55. (In Chinese)
[26]  Li, J.Q., Lu, S.F., Zhang, P.F., et al. (2020) Quantitative Characterization and Microscopic Occurrence Mechanism of Pore Water in Shale Matrix. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 41, 979-990. (In Chinese)
[27]  Hu, Z.M., Duan, X.G., He, Y.B., et al. (2018) Influence of Reservoir Primary Water on Shale Gas Occurrence and Flow Capacity. Natural Gas Industry, 38, 44-51. (In Chinese)
[28]  Ji, L.M., Qiu, J.L., Zhang, T.W. and Xia, Y.Q. (2012) Experiments on Methane Adsorption of Common Clay Minerals in Shale. Earth Science (Journal of China University of Geosciences), 37, 1043-1050. (In Chinese)
[29]  Li, W.G., Yang, S.L., Xu, J. and Dong, Q. (2012) A New Model for Shale Adsorptive Gas Amount under a Certain Geological Conditions of Temperature and Pressure. Natural Gas Geoscience, 23, 791-796. (In Chinese)
[30]  Zhong, G.H., Xie, B., Zhou, X., Peng, X. and Tian, C. (2016) A Logging Evaluation Method for Gas Content of Shale Gas Reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 36, 43-51. (In Chinese)
[31]  Ambrose, R.J., Hartman, R.C., Diaz-Campos, M., Akkutlu, I.Y. and Sondergeld, C.H. (2010) New Pore-Scale Considerations for Shale Gas in Place Calculations. The SPE Un-Conventional Gas Conference, Pittsburgh, 23-25 February 2010, 219-229. https://doi.org/10.2118/131772-MS
[32]  Li, Z. (2020) Sensitivity and Gas Content Change Effect of Niutitang Formation Shale Reservoir in Cengong Block, Guizhou. China University of Geosciences, Beijing. (In Chinese)
[33]  Li, W.B., Lu, S.F., Li, J.Q., et al. (2019) The Coupling Relationship between Material Composition and Pore Microstructure of Southern China Marine Shale. Natural Gas Geoscience, 30, 27-38. (In Chinese)
[34]  Tang, Y., Li, L.Z. and Jiang, S.X. (2014) A Logging Interpretation Methodology of Gas Content in Shale Reservoirs and Its Application. Natural Gas Industry, 34, 46-54. (In Chinese)
[35]  Boschetti, A. and Massaron, L. (2020). Python Data Science Essentials. Trans. By J. W. Yu, Machinery Industry Press, Beijing, 15-158. (In Chinese)
[36]  Scientific Platform Serving for Statistics Professional (SPSSPRO) (2021) Version 1.0.11. Online Application Software. https://www.spsspro.com
[37]  Yuan, J.R., Zeng, X.J., Wu, H.Y., et al. (2021) Analytical Determination of Interwell Connectivity Based on Interwell Influence. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 26, 813-820. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2020.9010039

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413