全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Development Status and Future Prospects of Biological Pesticides

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109915, PP. 1-15

Subject Areas: Agricultural Science

Keywords: Biological Pesticide, Policy, Scale

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Since the central government launched the “low toxicity biological pesticide subsidy demonstration pilot project” in eight provinces and cities in 2011, the country has successively issued a series of policies to guide the application and promotion of biological pesticides. This paper collects and analyzes the data from the field of biological pesticide policy practice for more than ten years. The results show that there are many related policy texts on the promotion of biological pesticides, and the policies tend to be perfect; the state subsidies for biopesticides are wide in scope and large in investment. The number of scientific research achievements has increased, and the biological pesticide itself is insufficient. The number of biopesticide enterprises decreased and the sales revenue increased. There are differences in farmers’ perceptions of biopesticides and the application of pesticides is affected by different incentive mechanisms. Suggestions are: Improve the supervision mechanism of biological pesticide standards, and introduce special promotion policies for biological pesticides; build a chain service of research, production and marketing of biopesticides, and establish a processing base of botanical biopesticides; optimize biopesticide products and create a high-quality and low-cost industrial chain; focus on the development of biopesticides and realize technology to help, benefit and work for agriculture.

Cite this paper

Chen, L. and Zhou, H. (2023). Development Status and Future Prospects of Biological Pesticides. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e9915. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109915.

References

[1]  祝创杰. 经济法视角下农业面源污染规制[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2017.
[2]  张庆林. 浅谈农药残留对农产品质量安全的影响与解决措施[J]. 农业与技术, 2016, 36(10): 33-33.
[3]  杨爱芳, 赵青红. 浅议农药残留监测对农产品安全监管的重要性[J]. 农村科学实验, 2020(3): 15-16.
[4]  刘新社, 陈妍. 生物农药对设施和露地黄瓜白粉病的防效及其品质和产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(3): 101-105 120.
[5]  冯敏, 李丽莉, 周仙红, 等. 生物农药对金银花蚜虫的防控效果研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(1): 131-135.
[6]  惠三雄, 马彬. 低毒生物农药在彬县苹果上示范推广的成效[J]. 基层农技推广, 2017(9): 85-86.
[7]  张静, 张秀芳. 农产品质量安全追溯体系建设现状与对策研究[J]. 当代经济, 2019(8): 113-115.
[8]  周佳麟, 陈咏梅, 吴旭乾, 等. 生物农药壳寡糖应用研究概况[J]. 河南农业, 2019(32): 61-62.
[9]  黄炎忠, 罗小锋, 李兆亮, 刘迪. 农户兼业对粮食生产效率的非线性影响[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(8): 1605-1614.
[10]  郭利京, 王颖. 农户生物农药施用为何“说一套, 做一套”?[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(4): 77-86 175.
[11]  邓微, 张云英, 成志刚. “农村人口老龄化问题”笔谈[J]. 湖南农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2013(6): 3-14.
[12]  田家榛, 孙炜琳. 基于农药施用频率影响因素下的农户施药各环节权重对比分析[J]. 农药, 2019, 58(7): 469-474.
[13]  姜利娜, 赵霞. 农户绿色农药购买意愿与行为的悖离研究——基于5省863个分散农户的调研数据[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2017, 22(5): 163-173.
[14]  郭利京, 赵瑾. 认知冲突视角下农户生物农药施用意愿研究——基于江苏639户稻农的实证[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(17): 123-133.
[15]  杨钰蓉, 罗小锋. 减量替代政策对农户有机肥替代技术模式采纳的影响——基于湖北省茶叶种植户调查数据的实证分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2018(10): 77-85.
[16]  罗小锋, 杜三峡, 黄炎忠, 等. 种植规模, 市场规制与稻农生物农药施用行为[J]. 农业技术经济, 2020(6): 71-80.
[17]  赵瑾, 郭利京. 新技术认知对农户亲环境行为的影响机理研究——以菜农生物农药施用为例[J]. 广东农业科学, 2017, 44(1): 183-192.
[18]  杨光. 生物农药成投机取巧重灾区[J]. 农药市场信息, 2016(3): 23.
[19]  王帆. 生物农药的发展优势及存在问题[J]. 新农业, 2021(9): 39-40.
[20]  罗岚, 李桦, 许贝贝. 绿色认知, 现实情景与农户生物农药施用行为——对意愿与行为悖离的现象解释[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2020, 41(4): 649-658.
[21]  杨瑞铭, 谢毅璇, 林春煌. 菜农农药施用行为影响因素分析——基于对厦门蔬菜种植农户调查[J]. 农产品质量与安全, 2019(2): 83-88.
[22]  周蒙. 中国生物农药发展的现实挑战与对策分析[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2021, 37(1): 184-192.
[23]  徐汉虹. 杀虫植物与植物性杀虫剂[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001.
[24]  中华人民共和国农业部农药检定所. 农药登记数据[EB/OL]. http://www.icama.org.cn/hysj/index.jhtml, 2017-02-20.
[25]  殷锐, 罗小锋, 李容容, 等. 信息化背景下农民为何青睐农技员到田间地头开展农技推广?[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2018(4): 576-583.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413