全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Identification, Prevalence, and Outcome of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (C-PCI)—A Single Center Experience

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109679, PP. 1-7

Subject Areas: Cardiology

Keywords: Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (C-PCI)

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the shift in PCI application, the underlying criteria of complex PCI and its impact on clinical outcomes remain unexplained. Methods: Single-center retrospective observational study of complex PCI characteristics and 1-year outcome. Complex PCI was defined as any of the following: three-vessel disease, bifurcation lesion, left main disease, and moderate to severe calcification by angiography and CTO. Results: The study cohort includes 551 patients who had PCI over a two-month period. 101 (20%) of all patients fulfilled the criteria for complex PCI: 20% have 3VD, 33% have LM disease, 38% have bifurcation, 43% have severe Calcification and 35% have CTO. Combined MACE was more common in C-PCI (40% vs 12.4% <0.001), all individual components were more common in C-PCI (Repeated Revascularization 7.9%Vs 3.7%, P 0.071), Rehospitalization for ACS (1.9% vs 2.2%, p 0.8), Recurrent Angina (9% vs 8%, p 0.071), and HF (7% vs 3.7%, p 0.161). Conclusion: Complex PCI is prevalent in everyday practice (20% of total patients) across all clinical presentations, age groups, and gender. The consequence is dismal.

Cite this paper

Leon, K. , Soleiman, M. , Kamel, A. , Thakeb, Y. , Cherif, E. and Zarif, B. (2023). Identification, Prevalence, and Outcome of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (C-PCI)—A Single Center Experience. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e9679. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109679.

References

[1]  Baber, U. (2018) Defining PCI Complexity in the Contemporary DES Era: Clarity or Confusion? International Journal of Cardiology, 268, 94-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.044
[2]  Vora, A.N., Dai, D., Gurm, H., Amin, A.P., Messenger, J.C., Mahmud, E., et al. (2016) Temporal Trends in the Risk Profile of Patients Undergoing Outpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry’S CathPCI Registry. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 9, e003070. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003070
[3]  Serruys, P.W., Morice, M.C., Kappetein, A.P., Colombo, A., Holmes, D.R., Mack, M.J., et al. (2009) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 961-972. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0804626
[4]  Stone, G.W., Kappetein, A.P., Sabik, J.F., Pocock, S.J., Morice, M.C., Puskas, J., et al. (2019) Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 381, 1820-1830. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1909406
[5]  Valle, J.A., Tamez, H., Abbott, J.D., Moussa, I.D., Messenger, J.C., Waldo, S.W., et al. (2019) Contemporary Use and Trends in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: An Analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Research to Practice Initiative. JAMA Cardiology, 4, 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4376
[6]  Endo, A., Kawamura, A., Miyata, H., Noma, S., Suzuki, M., Koyama, T., et al. (2015) Angiographic Lesion Complexity Score and In-Hospital Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. PLOS ONE, 10, e0127217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127217

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133