All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99


Creating Equitable Access to Education: A Comparative Analysis of North America & Northern Europe

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109515, PP. 1-14

Subject Areas: Educational Technology

Keywords: Equity, Education, Development, Accessibility, Comparative

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Education is one of the most significant building blocks in society, so much so that the United Nations has identified quality education as one of the key building blocks for sustainable development, stating that it enables upward socioeconomic mobility and aids global and local development (United Nations, 2020). Every year there are various studies done on education with the aim of creating more equitable access to education. Though research effort is shown when it comes to trying to improve equity in education, many countries still fall short and lack equitable access to education which impacts overall development. Recently Northern European countries such as Finland, Norway, and Denmark have skyrocketed on the World Economic Forums Advanced Economies Educational Equity list some even surpassing North American countries like Canada that have long held top ten positions on this list. This paper will use a comparative sociological approach to conduct a comparative analysis of education in northern Europe and North America, this research method offers a unique perspective that shines a light on areas where improvement is necessary. The objective of this research is to identify areas of improvement and offer suggestions on how countries can create more equitable access to education with the goal of long-term societal development.

Cite this paper

Soda, K. (2022). Creating Equitable Access to Education: A Comparative Analysis of North America & Northern Europe. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e9515. doi:


[1]  Bhardwaj, A. (2016) Importance of Education in Human Life: A Holistic Approach. International Journal of Science and Consciousness, 2, 23-28.
[2]  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2020) Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and Education: All Means All.
[3]  Field, S., Kuczera, M. and Pont, B. (2007) No More Failures: Ten Steps to Equity in Education. OECD, Paris.
[4]  So, H.J., Seah, L.H. and Toh-Heng, H.L. (2010) Designing Collaborative Knowledge Building Environments Accessible to All Learners: Impacts and Design Challenges. Computers and Education, 54, 479-490.
[5]  Whitney, G., Keith, S., Bühler, C., Hewer, S., Lhotska, L., Miesenberger, K., Sandnes, F.E., Stephanidis, C. and Velasco, C.A. (2011) Twenty-Five Years of Training and Education in ICT Design for All and Assistive Technology. Technology and Disability, 23, 163-170.
[6]  Galindo, M.Z. and Rodríguez, R.R. (2015) Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity in Higher Education in Europe. In: Mitigating Inequality: Higher Education Research, Policy, and Practice in an Era of Massification and Stratification, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, 311-336.
[7]  Ng, R. (2003) Toward an Integrative Approach to Equity in Education. In: Pedagogies of Difference, Routledge, London, 205-218.
[8]  Fernandez, R. and Rogerson, R. (2003) Equity and Resources: An Analysis of Education Finance Systems. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 858-897.
[9]  Buczynski, J.A. (2007) Faculty Begin to Replace Textbooks with “Freely” Accessible Online Resources. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11, 169-179.
[10]  Willems, J. and Bossu, C. (2012) Equity Considerations for Open Educational Resources in the Glocalization of Education. Distance Education, 33, 185-199.
[11]  Crow, G. (1997) The Theory and Practice of Comparative Sociology. In: Crow, G., Ed., Comparative Sociology and Social Theory, Palgrave, London, 9-30.
[12]  World Economic Forum (2019) Advanced Economies Educational Equity. Diversity and Inclusion Mapping.
[13]  Hegarty, K. (2008) Shaping the Self to Sustain the Other: Mapping Impacts of Academic Identity in Education for Sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 14, 681-692.
[14]  Government of Ontario (2020) The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-8. The Ontario Curriculum 2020, 75-80.
[15]  Cummins, J. (2006) Multiliteracies and Equity: How Do Canadian Schools Measure up? Education Canada, 46, 4-7.
[16]  Cajete, G. (1994) Look to the Mountain: An Ecology of Indigenous Education. Kivaki Press, Durango.
[17]  Deloria, V. and Wildcat, D.R. (2001) Power and Place: Indian Education in America. Fulcrum, Golden.
[18]  Kirkness, V.J. (1998) Our Peoples’ Education: Cut the Shackles; Cut the Crap; Cut the Mustard. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 22, 10-15.
[19]  Agbo, S.A. (2002) Decentralization of First Nations Education in Canada: Perspectives on Ideals and Realities of Indian Control of Indian Education. Interchange, 33, 281-302.
[20]  O’Connor, K. (2017) The Use of ICTs and E-Learning in Indigenous Education. State of the Nation: K-12 E-Learning in Canada.
[21]  Morales-Mann, E.T. and Kaitell, C.A. (2001) Problem-Based Learning in a New Canadian Curriculum. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33, 13-19.
[22]  Gray, S., Scott, D. and Mehisto, P. (2020) Curriculum Reform in the European Schools: Towards a 21st Century Vision. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 158.
[23]  Honkasilta, J., Ahtiainen, R., Hienonen, N. and Jahnukainen, M. (2019) Inclusive and Special Education and the Question of Equity in Education: The Case of Finland. The SAGE Handbook on Inclusion and Diversity in Education, Sage Publications, London.
[24]  Government of Canada (2009) The Ontario Curriculum Grades 1-8. Ontario Curriculum and Resources.
[25]  Government of British Columbia (2020) Programs, Resources and Guidelines for Inclusive Education. Inclusive Education Resources.
[26]  Saul, R. (2020) Temporality and Inequity: How Dominant Cultures of Time Promote Injustices in Schools. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 42, 49-69.
[27]  Virtanen, T.E., Moreira, P., Ulvseth, H., Andersson, H., Tetler, S. and Kuorelahti, M. (2018) Analyzing Measurement Invariance of the Students’ Engagement Instrument Brief Version: The Cases of Denmark, Finland, and Portugal. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 33, 297-313.
[28]  Halinen, I. and Järvinen, R. (2008) Towards Inclusive Education: The Case of Finland. Prospects, 38, 77-97.
[29]  UNESCO (2007) Equity and Quality in Education. Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools, 30-33.
[30]  Giota, J., Bergh, D. and Emanuelsson, I. (2019) Changes in Individualized Teaching Practices in Municipal and Independent Schools 2003, 2008 and 2014—Student Achievement, Family Background and School Choice in Sweden. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 5, 78-79.
[31]  Gallagher-Mackay, K., Kidder, A., Methot, S. and Strachan, J. (2013) First Nations, Métis, and Inuit Education: Overcoming Gaps in Provincially Funded Schools. People for Education, Toronto.
[32]  Campbell, C. (2020) Educational Equity in Canada: The Case of Ontario’s Strategies and Actions to Advance Excellence and Equity for Students. School Leadership and Management, 1-20.
[33]  Opheim (2004) Equity in Education: Country Analytical Report Norway.
[34]  UNESCO (2008) Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2009. Overcoming Inequality: Why Governance Matters. Oxford University Press, Oxford.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us