All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

ViewsDownloads

Not Even Wrong—A Reexamination

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109458, PP. 1-12

Subject Areas: Particle Physics

Keywords: Physical Theories, The Least Action Principle, The Electroweak Theory, The Not Even Wrong Concept

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Fundamental elements of physical theories of systems of objects are examined. Consider the Newtonian mechanics, Maxwellian electrodynamics, relativistic mechanics, general relativity, and the Dirac theory of the electron. Each of these theories has specific differential equations whose solutions accurately describe the state and the time evolution of systems of particles that belong to the theory’s domain of validity. Well-known textbooks prove that these theories can be derived from the least action principle that applies to an appropriate Lagrangian or Lagrangian density. The Noether theorem proves that the Euler-Lagrange differential equations of these theories conserve energymomentum, angular momentum, and charge. The electroweak theory, which is a part of the Standard Model of particle physics, is a contradictory example. Although this theory is about 50 years old, textbooks still do not show the explicit form of its differential equations that describe the electromagnetic interactions of the W± particles. Hence, the electroweak theory fails to show that solutions of its missing differential equations fit experimental data. For this reason, the electroweak theory belongs to the set of physical ideas that are not even wrong.

Cite this paper

Comay, E. (2022). Not Even Wrong—A Reexamination. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e9458. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109458.

References

[1]  Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, M.E. (1960) Mechanics. Pergamon, Oxford.
[2]  Goldstein, H., Poole, C. and Safko, J. (2002) Classical Mechanics. 3rd Edition, Addison Wesley, San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1484149
[3]  Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M. (2005) The Classical Theory of Fields. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
[4]  Jackson, J.D. (1975) Classical Electrodynamics. John Wiley, New York.
[5]  Purcell, E.M. and Morin, D.J. (2013) Electricity and Magnetism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012973
[6]  Rohrlich, F. (2007) Classical Charged Particle. World Scientific, Hackensack. https://doi.org/10.1142/6220
[7]  Bjorken, J.D. and Drell, S.D. (1964) Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[8]  The Wikipedia Item on General Relativity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity
[9]  Schiff, L.I. (1955) Quantum Mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[10]  The Wikipedia Item of Dirac Equation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation
[11]  Weinberg, S. (1995) The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644167
[12]  Bjorken, J.D. and Drell, S.D. (1965) Relativistic Quantum Fields. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[13]  Halzen, F. and Martin, A.D. (1984) Quarks and Leptons, an Introductory Course in Modern Particle Physics. John Wiley, New York.
[14]  Peskin, M.E. and Schroeder, D.V. (1995) An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
[15]  Weinberg, S. (1996) The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644174
[16]  Sterman, G. (1993) An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 518. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511622618
[17]  Cottingham, W.N. and Greenwood, D.A. (2007) An Introduction to the Standard Model of Particle Physics. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791406
[18]  The Wikipedia Item of the Not Even Wrong Concept. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong
[19]  Woit, P. (2006) Not Even Wrong. Basic Books, New York.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413