全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Bio-Fertilization Effect on the Foliar Content of Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) of Two QPM Maize Varieties in Two Luvisols of Yucatan, Mexico

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1109069, PP. 1-11

Subject Areas: Agricultural Engineering

Keywords: Nutrimental Efficiency, Nutrient Availability, Mycorrhizae, Azospirillum Bacteria

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The efficiency of two Quality Protein Maize (QPM): Sac Beh (Sac) and Chichen Itza (Chich) to extract nutrients from the soil and export to the plants was evaluated by applying Bio-fertilizers (Bio) in combination with Chemical fertilizers (Chem) in two rhodic Luvisols of Yucatan Mexico with low (Lot 1) and high (Lot 2) intensive agriculture use. This work was conducted in the Uxmal Experimental Station of Yucatan Mexico. Three treatments were evaluated: 1) the Control, No Chem no Bio, 2) Chem (60-80-00) of Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P2O5) and Potassium (K2O), and 3) the combination of Bio plus Chem (60-80-00 mycorrhizal fungi azospirillum bacteria) distributed in a Randomized Block Design with three repetitions. At silk stage, the opposite leaves of the ears were sampled and analyzed for Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) reported in percentage (%) and compared with Critical Levels. The yields (t·ha-1) were matched with the nutrient contents. The Sac was more efficient to extract N from the soil and exported to leaves than Chich in Lot 1 but Chich was more efficient than Sac in Lot 2. The two varieties showed foliar N contents below the critical levels in both lots, even with the application of fertilizers. In Lot 2 with higher P in the soil, any plant showed deficiencies including the Control (00-00-00). Deficiencies of K were determined in Sac-Lot 1 (1.60%) and Chich-Lot 2 (1.56%) just in the control (00-00-00) but not in Chem and Chem-Bio. This suggests that the absorption of native K in the soil was encouraged by the application of Chem and Bio. The deficiencies of K in the Control can be attributed to an antagonistic effect of the high contents of Calcium (Ca) and Magesium (Mg) over K in the soil.

Cite this paper

Ramírez-Silva, J. H. , Ramírez-Jaramillo, G. and Lozano-Contreras, M. G. (2022). Bio-Fertilization Effect on the Foliar Content of Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) of Two QPM Maize Varieties in Two Luvisols of Yucatan, Mexico. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e9069. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109069.

References

[1]  Sistema de información agroalimentario y pesquera (SIAP) (2020) Anuario estadístico-Agricultura. SAGARPA. http://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/
[2]  Valenzuela, L.M., Díaz, V.T. and Arciniega, R.J. (2012) Manejo de la nutrición en maíz. En: VI Jornada del Cultivo de Maíz, Fundación produce Sinaloa. Memoria de capacitación, INIFAP-SAGARPA. México, 47-65. https://www.fps.org.mx/portal/index.php/component/phocadownload/category/30-granos-y-flores?download=103:vi-jornada-del-cultivo-de-maiz
[3]  Chan-Chan, M., Moguel-Ordóñez, Y., Gallegos-Tintoré, S., Chel-Guerrero, L. and Betancur-Ancona, D. (2021) Caracterización química y nutrimental de variedades de maíz (Zea mays L.) de alta calidad de proteína (QPM) desarrolladas en Yucatán, México. Biotecnia, 23, 11-21. https://biotecnia.unison.mx/index.php/biotecnia/article/view/1334/543
[4]  Tiwari, M.R., Chapagain, B.P., Shah, M.K. and Shrestha, Y.K. (2013) Evaluation of Quality Protein Maize for Growth Performance of Crossbred Piglets in Western Hills of Nepal. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Agriculture and Veterinary, 13, 1-6. https://www.academia.edu/20451804/Evaluation_of_Quality_Protein_Maize_QPM_and_Normal_Mazie_for_Growth_Performance_of_Crossbred_Piglets_in_Wester_Hills_of_Nepal_
[5]  Aguilar, C.G., Gómez, M.N., Torres, P.H. and Vázquez, C.G. (2010) SAC-BEH y CHICHEN ITZA: Variedades de maíz de calidad proteínica para el sistema de Roza –Tumba –Quema de la Península de Yucatán. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Campo Experimental Mocochá. Centro Regional del Sureste, 24 p. https://www.compucampo.com/tecnicos/variedades-maizcalidadprote%C3%ADnica-yuc.pdf
[6]  Twumasi-Afriyie, S., Palacios-Rojas, N., Friesen, D., Teklewold, A., Wegary, D., De Groote, H. and Prasanna, B.M. (2016) Guidelines for the Quality Control of Quality Protein Maize (QPM) Seed and Grain. CIMMYT, Addis Ababa, 45 p. https://repository.cimmyt.org/bitstream/handle/10883/17806/58040.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
[7]  Castillo-Tovar, H. (2015) Fertilización Nitrogenada en Maíz. Boletín Electrónico Año 1, No. 1 del CIR-Noreste Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Centro de Investigación Regional Noreste. Campo Experimental Río Bravo. Cd. Río Bravo, Tamaulipas.
[8]  Norma Oficial Mexicana Nom-021-Semarnat-2000 (2002) Especificaciones de fertilidad, salinidad y clasificación de suelos, estudio, muestreo y análisis. http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup.php?codigo=791052
[9]  SEMARNAT (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales) (2002) Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-021-RECNAT-2000, que establece las especificaciones de fertilidad, salinidad y clasificación de suelos, estudios, muestreo y análisis. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Diario official. http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/Documentos/Federal/wo69255.pdf
[10]  Phytomonitor (2017) Archivo de análisis de fertilidad de suelos-2020 del laboratorio Phytomonitor. Calzada Aeropuerto N° 7299-B. Colonia Bachigualato. Culiacán Sinaloa, México. CP. 80140.
[11]  Jones Jr., J.B. and Eck, H.V. (1973) Plant Analysis as an Aid in Fertilizing Corn and Grain Sorghum. In: Walsh, L.M. and Beaton, J.D., Eds., Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, 349-364.
[12]  Remache, M., Carrillo, M., Mora, R., Durango, W. and Morales, F. (2017) Absorción de macronutrientes y eficiencia del N, en híbrido promisorio de maíz. Patricia Pilar, Ecuador. Agronomía Costarricense, 41, 103-115.
[13]  Aguilar-Carpio, C., Escalante-Estrada, J.A.S., Aguilar-Mariscal, I., Mejía-Contreras, J.A., Conde-Martínez, V.F. and Trinidad-Santos, A. (2015) Rendimiento y rentabilidad de maíz en función del genotipo, biofertilizante y nitrógeno, en clima cálido. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 18, 151-163. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/939/93941388004.pdf
[14]  Díaz-Franco, A., Salinas-García, J.R., Garza-Cano, I. and Mayek-Pérez, N. (2008) Impacto de labranza e inoculación micorrízica arbuscular sobre la pudrición carbonosa y rendimiento de maíz en condiciones semiáridas. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 31, 257-263. https://revfitotecnia.mx/index.php/RFM/article/view/693
[15]  Khan, A., Munsif, F., Akhtar, K., Afridi, M.Z., Zahoor, Ahmad, Z., Fahad, S., Ullah, R., Khan, F.A. and Din, M. (2014) Response of Fodder Maize to Various Levels of Nitrogen and Phosphorus. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 2323-2329. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.515246
[16]  Smith, S.E. and Read, D.J. (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Elsevier, London, 605.
[17]  Li, H., Huang, G., Meng, Q., Ma, L., Yuan, L., Wang, F., Zhang, W., Cui, Z., Shen, J., Chen, X., Jiang, R. and Zhang, F. (2011) Integrated Soil and Plant Phosphorus Management for Crop and Environment in China. A Review. Plant and Soil, 349, 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0909-5 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11104-011-0909-5#citeas
[18]  Kalkhajeh, Y.K., Huang, B., Hu, W., Holm, P.E. and Hansen, H.C. (2017) Phosphorus Saturation and Mobilization in Two Typical Chinese Greenhouse Vegetable Soils. Chemosphere, 172, 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.147 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653516318914

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413