全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

The Subversion and Unity of Reality and Fiction—The Binary Opposition in Atonement

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1108940, PP. 1-8

Subject Areas: Literature

Keywords: Atonement, Truth, Fiction, Binary Opposition, Moral Dilemma, Self and the Other

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Atonement is McEwan’s classic which hybrids truth and fiction. The space of reality distinct from history embodies truth; the reconstruction of fact, and an unexpected ending of metafiction reflects its fiction. Based on the semiotic rectangle theory of A. J. Greimas, this paper analyzes the binary opposition between Briony and Robbie to reveal the moral dilemma faced by Briony, explain the subversion of reality and fiction and the contradictory relationship between self and the Other, and present the unity of truth and fiction after the dissolution of the binary opposition.

Cite this paper

Qi, Z. (2022). The Subversion and Unity of Reality and Fiction—The Binary Opposition in Atonement. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e8940. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108940.

References

[1]  蓝纯. 伊恩·麦克尤恩其人其作[J]. 外国文学, 1998, 19(6): 23-27.
[2]  朱立元. 当代西方文艺理论[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2002.
[3]  伊恩·麦克尤恩. 赎罪[M]. 郭国良, 等, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2018.
[4]  曾艳钰. 误读的焦虑——麦克尤恩《赎罪》中的真实与误读的真实[J]. 当代外国文学, 2013, 35(2): 112-118.
[5]  邹涛. 叙事认知中的暴力与救赎——评麦克尤恩的《赎罪》[J]. 当代外国文学, 2011, 32(4): 67-73.
[6]  丁建宁. 赎罪如何可能?——评伊恩·麦克尤恩的《赎罪》[J]. 外国文学动态, 2004 (6): 20-22.
[7]  杜维平, 高一琼. 麦克尤恩的自由国度——论《赎罪》的陌生化叙事结构[J]. 山西大学学报, 2009, 32(6): 60-63.
[8]  宋艳芳, 罗媛. 谁该赎罪? 何以赎罪?——《赎罪》的伦理经纬[J]. 外国文学研究, 2012, 34(1): 83-90.
[9]  张和龙. 宏大而优美的心灵史诗——评伊恩·麦克尤恩的《赎罪》[J]. 外国文学研究动态, 2008(2): 20-22.
[10]  黄一畅. 复杂人性的质询——论《赎罪》的解构叙事效应[J]. 外国语, 2010, 33(6): 89-94.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413