全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

A Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of National Building Code of Nepal, India, Bangladesh and China

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1108933, PP. 1-11

Subject Areas: Civil Engineering

Keywords: Base Shear, Seismic Analysis, Displacement, Seismic Design Provision, Comparative Study

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The use of modern technologies in Civil Engineering is increasing in recent years. Due to the different aesthetic needs of people, the building of different shapes and sizes is in practice. Such building structure is more susceptible to seismic force. Numerous methods have been followed to reduce the severe effects. The shape of a building is one such method which changes the structural behavior. The objective of this research is to compare seismic properties of the seismic region of Nepal using Nepal, India, Bangladesh and China building codes provision for the same building structure with variations in the shape of a structure. Four different shapes of buildings are considered in the study and a comparison is made between different shapes of buildings against the effect of lateral loads due to the earthquake. Computer-Aided Design (CAD) is carried out to perform the relative comparison between different country building codes provision and focus on the effect due to building shape variation. In this study, countries along the Himalayan arc are chosen for a review of different seismic codes. A model RC building of four different shapes located in Nepal is analyzed by using Nepal Buildings Code (NBC 105, 1994), Indian Code (IS 1893-1, 2016), Bangladesh Code (BNBC 1993: 2014), and China Code (GB 50011: 2010). The responses of the building under the parameters like Response Spectrum Curve, base shear, time period, and absolute displacement are compared for all four codes. Based on the design base shear, China code showed a higher value compared with other codes because the design horizontal seismic force coefficient, base shear, and absolute displacement of China code are maximum than other codes. On varying the shape of a structure for base shear estimation, a similar pattern is observed. Hence, it can be concluded that shape has a negligible effect on the base shear of the structure.

Cite this paper

Adhikari, D. , Adhikari, S. and Thapa, D. (2022). A Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of National Building Code of Nepal, India, Bangladesh and China. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e8933. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108933.

References

[1]  Bari, M.S. and Das, T. (2013) A Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of Bangladesh National Building Code (BNBC) with Other Building Codes. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 94, 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-014-0053-3
[2]  Dhanvijay, V., Telang, P.D. and Nair, V. (2012) Comparative Study of Different Codes in Seismic Assessment. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2, 1371-1381.
[3]  Singh, Y. and Khose, V.N. (2015) A Comparative Study of Code Provisions for Ductile RC Frame Buildings. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 4, 3012-3021.
[4]  Landingin, J., Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., Arêde, A. and Costa, A. (2014) Comparative Analysis of RC Irregular Buildings Designed According to Different Seismic Design Codes. The Open Construction & Building Technology Journal, 7, 221-229. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836801307010221
[5]  IS 1893 (Part 1) (2016) IS 1893 (Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1893, 1-44.
[6]  Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC), Government of Nepal, Ministry of Physical Planning and Works (1994) Nepal National Building Code NBC 105:1994 Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal. Nepal National Building Code, No. 10.
[7]  Tamrakar, A. and Chen, S. (2017) Comparison of the Seismic Design Code for Buildings of Nepal with the Chinese, European and American Seismic Design Codes. The Thirtieth KKHTCNN Symposium on Civil Engineering, Taiwan, 2-4 November 2017.
[8]  Nahhas, T.M. (2017) A Comparison of Saudi Building Code with 1997 UBC for Provisions of Modal Response Spectrum Analysis Using a Real Building. Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 6, 98-116. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2017.62006
[9]  Aryal, E.A. and Dhungana, E.S. (2020) Comparative Analysis of NBC with IS Code for RC Structures. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6, 2113-2117.
[10]  Bureau of Indian Standards New Delhi (2002) Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures—General Provisions and Buildings Part-1. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, Part 1, 1-39.
[11]  Itti, S.V., Pathade, P.A. and Karadi, R.B. (2012) A Comparative Study on Seismic Provisions Made in Indian and International Building Codes for RC Buildings. Vol. 3. https://www.sefindia.org/forum/files/a_comparative_study_on_seismic_provisions_made_in_indian_and_international_building_codes_for_rc_buildings_107.pdf
[12]  Luo, K.H. and Wang, Y.Y. (2012) Researches about the Conversion Relationships among the Parameters of Ground Motions in the Seismic Design Codes of China, America and Europe. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 36, 103-107.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413