全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

New Viewpoint on Readers’ Reception in Formalist Literary Theory

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1108895, PP. 1-9

Subject Areas: Literature

Keywords: Formalist, Literary Theory, Readers’ Acceptance, Literary Review

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Formalist Literary Theory is an important link in the development process of the research focus of western literary theory from the author to the reader. Formalist Literary Theory advocates the independence and self-sufficiency of literature, trying to cut off the connection between works and external society, including authors and readers, and establishes an independent and systematic literary science in centripetal criticism centered on the language form of works. However, it is only a theoretical assumption that literature can be independent completely from factors other than works, and literature can not exist without the subject of acceptance. This paper attempts to make a systematic and in-depth analysis and summary of the readers’ acceptance of Formalist Literary Theory, and discusses its theoretical gains and losses from the perspective of the development of literary theory.

Cite this paper

Zhang, Q. (2022). New Viewpoint on Readers’ Reception in Formalist Literary Theory. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e8895. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108895.

References

[1]  任虎军. 从读者经验到阐释社会——斯坦利·费什的读者反应批评理论评介[J]. 四川外语学院学报, 2005(1): 43-46.
[2]  Erlich, V. (1955) Russian Formalist Literary Theory: History-Doctrine. Hague University Press, The Hague.
[3]  黄念然. 形式主义文论的自足论析评[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016(5): 110-117.
[4]  黄念然. 形式主义文论中的唯科学主义批判[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2016, 30(4): 140-147.
[5]  Jackson, L. (1991) The Poverty of Structuralism: Literature and Structuralist Theory. University of Oxford Press, London.
[6]  Eliot, S. and Owens, W.R. (1998) A Handbook to Literary Research: Routledge & The Open University, London & New York.
[7]  张永刚. 形式主义文论的发展及自我终结[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2009(3): 39-45.
[8]  Jancovich, M. (1993) The Cultural Politics of the New Criticism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519321
[9]  昂智慧. “文学科学”的弊端——论保尔·德曼对结构主义文学批评的批评[J]. 外国文学, 2005(2): 35-41.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413