All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99


The Extent of the Challenges in Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1108233, PP. 1-13

Subject Areas: Psychology, Sociology

Keywords: Challenges, Online Learning, COVID-19, Pandemic

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


The study aimed at identifying the profile of the respondents and the challenges in online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic experienced by the students in the College of Education at the Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology during the first semester of the academic year 2020-2021. The identified challenges were slow internet connectivity; using data only; gadget used; noise environmental/surroundings/distractions; financial/budget considerations; technical issues; lack of in-person interaction; understanding course expectations; time management; staying motivated; and uncertainty about the future. The 299 students were asked to accomplish a customized questionnaire prepared by the researchers to get the profile variables and the challenges encountered during the COVID-19 Pandemic through “google forms.” Only 212 responded due to their limitations. The responses were downloaded from the google forms in the spreadsheet format. The quantitative and qualitative methods were used in analyzing and interpreting the data. Most respondents are Bachelor of Technology and Livelihood Education students. They are first-year females and fall within 20 years old and below. All the identified challenges were verbally described as “Very High Extent.” The students’ topmost challenges were noise/environmental distractions, technical issues, and slow internet connection. Course expectations and uncertainly about the future were the minor challenges in online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The challenge on “staying motivated” is significantly correlated with their “course”, and “used data only” with their age and year-level. Although, the overall result shows no significant relationship between the profiles of the respondents and the challenges in online learning. There should be a student’s needs assessment on internet connection and equipment needed to meet the demands of the online classes before the opening of classes. Alternative delivery of instruction must be prioritized, students must be allowed to practice their skills, free themselves from the noise/environmental distractions, free-webinar lecture on troubleshooting technical issues they experienced in online learning, and a review and revision of the syllabus of instruction should be prioritized.

Cite this paper

Cabual, R. A. and Cabual, M. M. A. (2022). The Extent of the Challenges in Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e8233. doi:


[1]  Horton, W. (2006) E-Learning by Design. Pfeiffer, San Francisco.
[2]  Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., Cabrera, N. and Bravo, S. (2011) Towards an Inclusive Definition of e-Learning. eLearning Center UOC (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya), Barcelona..
[3]  Raheem, B.R. and Khan, M.A. (2020) The Role of E-Learning in Covid-19 Crisis. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 8, 3135-3138.
[4]  Cohen, E. and Nycz, M. (2006) Learning Objects and E-Learning: An Informing Science Perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 2, 23-34.
[5]  Oye, N.D., Salleh, M. and Iahad, N.A. (2012) E-Learning Methodologies and Tools. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3, 48-52.
[6]  Cheung, C. and Cable, J. (2017) Eight Principles of Effective Online Teaching: A Decade-Long Lessons Learned in Project Management Education. PM World Journal, 6, 1-16.
[7]  Babu, D.G.S. and Sridevi, D.K. (2018) Importance of E-Learning in Higher Education: A Study. International Journal of Research Culture Society, 2, 84-88.
[8]  Fellows, R. and Liu, A. (2008) Research Methods for Construction. 3rd Edition, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Hoboken.
[9]  Matthews, B. and Ross, L. (2010) Research Methods. Pearson Longman, London.
[10]  Hakim, C. (2000) Research Design: Successful Designs for Social and Economic Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[11]  Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2007) The Ethics of Management Research: An Exploratory Content Analysis. British Journal of Education, 18, 63-77.
[12]  Cabual, R.A. (2021) Learning Styles and Preferred Learning Modalities in the New normal. OALib, 8, 1-14.
[13]  (2021) Ph Moves up in Mobile Internet Speed Global Rankings. Department of Information and Communication Technology.
[14]  Piaget, J. (1977) The Development of Thought: Equilibrium of Cognitive Structures. Viking as Cited by Constructivism and Online Education by Peter E. Doolittle, Virginia Tech, New York.
[15]  Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Golan Duncan, R. and Chinn, C. (2007) Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99-107.
[16]  Ane, T. and Nepa, T. (2021) Statistical Survey of Students’ Performance: Online Education to COVID-19 in Bangladesh. Open Access Library Journal, 8, 1-10.
[17]  Paris, S.G. and Turner, J.C. (1994) Situated Motivation. In: Pintrich, P.R., Brown, D.R. and Weinstein, C.E., Eds., Student Motivation, Cognition, and Learning: Essays in Honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie, Lawrence Elbraum, Hillside, 213-237.
[18]  Schunk, D.H. and Usher, E.L. (2012) Social Cognitive Theory and Motivation. In: Ryan, R.M., Ed., The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 13-27.
[19]  Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E.L. (2000) Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
[20]  Brophy, J. (2010) Motivating Students to Learn. 3rd Edition, Routledge, New York.
[21]  Schunk, D.H., Meece, J.L. and Pintrich, P.R. (2014) Motivation in Education: Theory Research and Applications. 94th Edition, Pearson, Boston.
[22]  Bekele, T.A. (2010) Motivation and Satisfaction in Internet-Supported Learning Environments: A Review. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 116-127.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us