全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Experimental Investigation on the Compressive Strength and Durability Performance of Modified Dry-Stack Hollow Sandcrete Blocks

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1108216, PP. 1-13

Subject Areas: Civil Engineering

Keywords: Blended Sand, Dry-Stack Hollow, Sandcrete Blocks, Compressive Strengths, Abrasion, Water Absorption

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The increase in construction costs has resulted in the shortage of decent housing in Kenya. As a result, the majority of the population lives in substandard housing. One way of reducing the cost of housing is by replacing the mortared masonry units with dry-stack hollow masonry units. In this study, Dry-stack hollow Sandcrete Blocks (DHSBs) were developed by utilizing blended sand (30% marine and 70% lateritic sand) and sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) (15%) as replacement of river sand and partial replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement, respectively. Two types of dry-stack hollow sandcrete blocks (DHSBs) were mechanically developed and identified as T-DHSBs and R-DHSBs. The compressive strength and durability performance of the DHSBs were investigated through laboratory experiments. The durability of the DHSBs was assessed through water absorption and abrasion tests. The 28-day compressive strengths of T-DHSBs and R-DHSBs were found to be 3.58 Mpa and 4.04 Mpa respectively and the water absorption values for T-DHSBs and R-DHSBs were 8.98% and 9.39% respectively. The losses of weight due to abrasion for T-DHSB and R-DHSBs were 0.056% and 0.051% respectively. The compressive strength and durability of the DHSBs were found to meet the specifications provided in NIS 87:2000 and BS 5628-1:2005 respectively.

Cite this paper

Arasa, F. O. , Onchiri, R. and Abiero-Gariy, Z. C. (2021). Experimental Investigation on the Compressive Strength and Durability Performance of Modified Dry-Stack Hollow Sandcrete Blocks. Open Access Library Journal, 8, e8216. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108216.

References

[1]  Murray, E.B. (2007) Dry Stacked Surface Bonded Masonry—Structural Testing and Evaluation. Master’s Thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo.
[2]  McKenzie, W.M.C. (2001) Design of Structural Masonry. Palgrave, London.
[3]  Jonaitis, B. and Zavalis, R. (2013) Experimental Research of Hollow Concrete Block Masonry Stress Deformations. Procedia Engineering, 57, 473-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.061
[4]  Oyebisi, S.O., Afolayan, O.D., Oladeji, S. and Oniemayin, B.I. (2021) Assessing the Low-Cost Buildings in Nigeria Using Hydraform Blocks as Walling Materials: The Journey So Far. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1036, Article ID: 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1036/1/012044
[5]  Ombiro, R.O. and Mbugua, J. (2018) Factors Influencing Use of Interlocking Red Bricks Technology in Housing Projects: A Case of Isiolo County, Kenya. University of Nairobi, Nairobi.
[6]  Sornchomkeaw, P. and Duangkeaw, S. (2014) The Study of Compressive Strength of Interlocking Brick by Using Bottom Ash Instead of Cement. American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information Journals, 9, 12.
[7]  Vennila, R., Anuradha, R. and Kavitha, S. (2017) Compressive Strength on Interlocking Concrete Blocks with Acacia Nilotica Ash and Broken Tiles. International Journal of ChemTech Research, 10, 355-358.
[8]  Ahmad, S. (2014) To Study the Behavior of Interlocking of Masonry Units/Blocks. IOSR Journal of Engineering, 4, 39-47.
[9]  Assiamah, S., Abeka, H. and Agyeman, S. (2016) Comparative Study of Interlocking and Sandcrete Blocks for Building Walling Systems. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 5, 1-10.
[10]  Arasa, F.O., Onchiri, R. and Abiero-Gariy, Z.C. (2017) Effect of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash on the Engineering Properties of Blended Sandcrete Blocks. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 6, 327-337.
[11]  Kenya Bureau of Standards (2005) KS EAS 18-1: 2001-Cement Part 1: Composition, Specification and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. Kenya Bureau of Standards, Nairobi.
[12]  BSI (1992) BS 882: Specification for Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete.
[13]  Asiedu, E. and Agbenyega, A. (2014) Suitability of Laterite Fines as a Partial Replacement for Sand in the Production of Sandcrete Bricks Laterite Bricks. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 4, 9-15.
[14]  BSI (1980) BS 3148: Methods of Test for Water for Making Concrete.
[15]  Standard Organization of Nigeria (2000) NIS 87: Specification for Standard Sandcrete Blocks. Nigeria Industrial Standard.
[16]  BSI (1981) BS 6073-1: Precast Concrete Masonry Units. Specification for Precast Concrete Masonry Units.
[17]  Duggal, S. (2009) Building Materials. New Age International Publisher, New Delhi.
[18]  Raheem, A.A., Falola, O.O. and Adeyeye, K.J. (2012) Production and Testing of Lateritic Interlocking Blocks. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 17, 35-50.
[19]  BSI (2005) BS 5628-1: Code of Practice for the Use of Masonry. Structural Use of Unreinforced Masonry.
[20]  BSI (1996) BS 2028: Specification for Precast Concrete Blocks. British Standard Institution, Gayland and Sons Ltd., London.
[21]  Ezeokonkwo, J.C. (2012) Optimisation of Cavity Size in Hollow Sandcrete Blocks. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3, 86-90.
[22]  Anowai S.I. and Afunanya, J.E. (2017) Millet Husk Ash as Partial Replacement of Cement in Sandcrete Block. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4, 2-5.
[23]  Nwaigwe, D.N., Ogwu, E.A., Ugonna, M.C., Atakpu, O. and Edom, A. (2015) Evaluation of the Quality of Hand Moulded Sandcrete Block in Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development Studies, 8, 252-259.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413