全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Increased Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes; of Vitrified Blastocyst on Different Days of Embryo Development: Day 5 Compared to Day 6 Transfer

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1107322, PP. 1-13

Subject Areas: Gynecology & Obstetrics

Keywords: Embryo Transfer, Day 5 Embryo Transfer, Day 5 vs Day 6, Embryo Culture and Grading, Vitrification and Warming of Blastocysts, VBT Protocol, Outcome Measures

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

This review article demonstrates and shows the embryo transfer process in ART treatment; It also compares different embryo transfer timing and days to evaluate the pregnancy and implantation rates with day three versus day five embryo and day five versus day six embryo transfer. The review was carried out to prove that day five embryo transfer has better clinical pregnancy outcomes than day 3; thus, the embryo would spend more time developing blastocytes. Furthermore, day five embryo transfer is also preferred over day six embryo transfer since it fits the implementation window and endometrium receptivity.

Cite this paper

Zakaria, M. , Steven, M. F. , Louanjli, N. , Senhaji, W. R. , Natiq, A. and Zarqaoui, M. (2021). Increased Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes; of Vitrified Blastocyst on Different Days of Embryo Development: Day 5 Compared to Day 6 Transfer . Open Access Library Journal, 8, e7322. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107322.

References

[1]  Choe, J.S., Archer, J. and Shanks, A.L. (2020) In Vitro Fertilization. StatPearls, Treasure Island.
[2]  Iketubosin, F. (2018) In Vitro Fertilization Embryo Transfer Processes and Pathway: A Review from Practice Perspective. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 35, 227. https://doi.org/10.4103/TJOG.TJOG_83_18
[3]  Cenksoy, P. and T?ras, B. (2014) Practice of Embryo Transfer: Recommendations during and after. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 32, 291-296. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1375181
[4]  Abdelmassih, V., Balmaceda, J., Nagy, Z., Abdelmassih, S. and Abdelmassih, R. (2001) ICSI and Day 5 Embryo Transfers: Higher Implantation Rates and Lower Rate of Multiple Pregnancy with Prolonged Culture. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 3, 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62039-1
[5]  Kaye, L., Will, E., Bartolucci, A., Nulsen, J., Benadiva, C. and Engmann, L. (2017) Pregnancy Rates for Single Embryo Transfer (SET) of Day 5 and Day 6 Blastocysts after Cryopreservation by Vitrification and Slow Freeze. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 34, 913-919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0940-4
[6]  de los Santos, M., Mercader, A., Galán, A., Albert, C., Romero, J. and Pellicer, A. (2014) Implantation Rates after Two, Three, or Five Days of Embryo Culture. Placenta, 14, S13-S19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00172-3
[7]  Xu, H., Qiu, S., Chen, X., Zhu, S., Sun, Y. and Zheng, B. (2020) D6 Blastocyst Transfer on Day 6 in Frozen-Thawed Cycles Should Be Avoided: A Retrospective Cohort Study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20, Article No. 519. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03224-z
[8]  Hashimoto, S., Amo, A., Hama, S., Ito, K., Nakaoka, Y. and Morimoto, Y. (2013) Growth Retardation in Human Blastocysts Increases the Incidence of Abnormal Spindles and Decreases Implantation Potential after Vitrification. Human Reproduction, 28, 1528-1535. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det059
[9]  Sunkara, S., Siozos, A., Bolton, V., Khalaf, Y., Braude, P. and El-Toukhy, T. (2010) The Influence of Delayed Blastocyst Formation on the Outcome of Frozen-Thawed Blastocyst Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Human Reproduction, 25, 1906-1915. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq143
[10]  Park, D., Kim, J., Chang, E., Lee, W., Yoon, T. and Lyu, S. (2020) Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score Matching. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 11, 499. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00499
[11]  Davie, J., Neitzel, D., Robinson, K., Zhu, M. and Faulkner, N. (2017) Aneuploidy Rates in Day 5 vs Day 6 Biopsies. Fertility and Sterility, 108, e283-e284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.840
[12]  Taylor, T.H., Patrick, J.L., Gitlin, S.A., Wilson, J.M., Crain, J.L. and Griffin, D.K. (2014) Comparison of Aneuploidy, Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates between Day 5 and Day 6 Blastocysts. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 29, 305-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.001
[13]  Gultomruk, M., Findikli, N., Boynukalin, F., Caferler, J. and Bahceci, M. (2019) Does Euploidy on Day 5 or Day 6 Matter for Clinical Outcome in Frozen Single Blastocyst Transfers? Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 38, e55-e56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.089
[14]  Quinn, K., Matson, B., Wetendorf, M. and Caron, K. (2020) Pinopodes: Recent Advancements, Current Perspectives, and Future Directions. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 501, Article ID: 110644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2019.110644
[15]  Kim, H. and Matevossian, K. (2020) It’s All about Timing: Is the Window of Implantation Different for Day 5 and 6 Blastocysts? Fertility and Sterility, 114, 69-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.031
[16]  VanVoorhis, B. and Dokras, A. (2008) Delayed Blastocyst Transfer: Is the Window Shutting? Fertility and Sterility, 89, 31-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.172
[17]  Gardner, D. and Lane, M. (2000) Handbook of in Vitro Fertilization. 2nd Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
[18]  Haas, J., Meriano, J., Laskin, C., Bentov, Y., Barzilay, E., Casper, R.F., et al. (2016) Clinical Pregnancy Rate Following Frozen Embryo Transfer Is Higher with Blastocysts Vitrified on Day 5 than on Day 6. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33, 1553-1557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0818-x
[19]  Yang, H., Yang, Q., Dai, S., Li, G., Jin, H., Yao, G., et al. (2016) Comparison of Differences in Development Potentials between Frozen-Thawed D5 and D6 Blastocysts and Their Relationship with Pregnancy Outcomes. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33, 865-872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0712-6
[20]  Campbell, A., Fishel, S., Bowman, N., Duffy, S., Sedler, M. and Hickman, C.F.L. (2013) Modelling a Risk Classification of Aneuploidy in Human Embryos Using Non-Invasive Morphokinetics. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 26, 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.02.006

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413