全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Alignment between Curriculum, Textbook and Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Question Papers of English at Secondary Level

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1107282, PP. 1-9

Subject Areas: Sociology

Keywords: Textbooks, National Curriculum, Bloom’s Taxonomy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

This study deals with the alignment between National Curriculum, Textbooks, and Question papers of Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education (BISE) in the subject of English at secondary level. The purpose of the study was to check the alignment of National Curriculum for English Language, 2006 with the Textbooks of English for Grade IX-X, and to evaluate the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education (BISE) question papers with reference to cognitive domain of Bloom’s taxonomy and with the corresponding textbooks. This study was done through document analysis. The documents analyzed for the study were the National Curriculum for English Language, Textbooks of English for Grade IX-X, and question papers of BISE of year 2014 and 2015. The instruments used for this study were the 1) Curriculum Textbook Alignment Framework and 2) Curriculum Textbook Alignment Rubric. The question papers of Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education were analyzed through the checklist developed by researcher. It was validated through expert opinion. Findings of the study depict that the SLOs stated in the textbooks of English were not completely matched with the SLOs narrated in National Curriculum Furthermore, the textbooks are not very helpful in achieving those SLOs with the help of the assessment exercises given in the textbook because most of the questions given in the textbook are not related to SLOs of National Curriculum. Findings further report that the all the question papers of Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education (BISE) for year 2014 and 2015 focused on knowledge and understanding level of Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive domain and very less focus were given on application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation abilities. It was recommended that the same SLOs of National Curriculum of English Language for Grade IX-X should be included in the textbooks otherwise the alignment will suffer and the SLOs of higher order thinking skills should also be included in the textbooks. There should be a balance between the higher level and lower level cognitive skills Paper setters should be well aware of the Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive domain and question papers should include items of all cognitive levels in accordance with assessment scheme of Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, and specifications mentioned in the National Curriculum of English.

Cite this paper

Mahroof, A. and Saeed, M. (2021). Alignment between Curriculum, Textbook and Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Question Papers of English at Secondary Level . Open Access Library Journal, 8, e7282. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107282.

References

[1]  Mahmood, K. (2011) Conformity to Quality Characteristics of Textbooks: The Illusion of Textbook Evaluation in Pakistan. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 5, 170-190.
[2]  Tomlinson, B. (2010) Principles of Effective Materials Development. In: Harwood, N., Ed., English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 81-98.
[3]  Government of Pakistan (2006) National Curriculum of English for Class IX-X, Islamabad. Ministry of Education, Curriculum Wing.
[4]  Bloom, B.S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay Co Inc., New York.
[5]  UNESCO (1998) UNESCO Statistical Yearbook. UNESCO, Paris.
[6]  Karamouzian, F.M., Narcy-Combes, M. and Ahmed, F. (2014) A Post-Use Evaluation of Pakistani Secondary School English Textbooks. TESOL International Journal, 9, 15-37.
[7]  Saeed, M. and Rashid, S. (2014) Alignment between Chemistry Curriculum and Textbooks at Secondary Level. The Sindh University Journal of Education, 43, 29-46.
[8]  Shah, S.K., Rafique, S., Shakir, A. and Zahid, S. (2014) Textbook Evaluation of English for Academic Purposes by British Council. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4, 104-114.
[9]  Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
[10]  Rapley, T. (2007) The Sage Qualitative Research Kit. Doing Conversation, Discourse and Document Analysis. Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413