All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99

ViewsDownloads

Academic Summarization via “Twitter” in a College EFL Context

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1107273, PP. 1-16

Subject Areas: Teaching and Learning Technologies

Keywords: Coherence, Content, EFL, Summarization, Twitter

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The purpose of the current study is to investigate the effect of the limitation of 140-character in Twitter versus the free writing on the skill of the summary of senior level female students of the Department of English at Jouf University. The participants of the study consisted of 60 female students who were enrolled in writing skills course (ENGL122) the participants were distributed into two groups, each of 30 students according to their scores in TOEIC, test of English for International Communication. After that, the pre-test was administered to the two groups. Both groups had the same instructor but each group was instructed in a separate class. The study was conducted in eight sessions (experimental semester). Pre-test and post-test were administered over the study sample to evaluate the significant effect on participants’ summary writing in both groups. The study results indicated that participants in both experimental and control groups achieved higher mean scores in their performance of summary writing in terms of content comparing to their mean scores in terms of coherence. Also, the results show that the performance of Twitter group in summary writing score higher results in favor of coherence compared to the control group. Therefore, new technology and social media means such as twitter contributes to solve many of the problems EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners could face. This study aims to increase the motivation of Institutions of higher education to integrate Twitter with the educational process.

Cite this paper

Almuwayshir, R. K. (2021). Academic Summarization via “Twitter” in a College EFL Context. Open Access Library Journal, 8, e7273. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107273.

References

[1]  Chang, Y., Wang, X., Mei, Q. and Liu, Y. (2013) Towards Twitter Context Summarization with User Influence Models. 6th ACM International WSDM Conference, Rome, 4-8 February 2013, 527-536. https://doi.org/10.1145/2433396.2433464 http://www-personal.umich.edu/~qmei/pub/wsdm2013-chang.pdf
[2]  Wichadee, S. (2013) Improving Students’ Summary Writing Ability through Collaboration: A Comparison between Online WIKI Group and Conventional Face-to- Face Group. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12, 107-116.
[3]  Wehmeyer, D. (2011) Summary Writing. http://www.wisc-online.com/objects/ViewObject.aspx?ID=TRG2603
[4]  Nguyen, T. (2011) The Problems That Students Encounter in Writing Summaries and Recommended Guidelines. http://www.dlu.edu.vn/FileUpload/20113219479734.doc
[5]  Kintsch, W. and van Dijk, T.A. (1978) Toward a Model of Text Comprehension and Production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394. https://content.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
[6]  Brown, A. and Day, J. (1983) Macro Rules for Summarizing Texts: The Development of Expertise. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-16.
[7]  Cunningham, J.W. (1987) Generating Interactions between Schemata and Text. In: Niles, J.A. and Harris, L.A., Eds., New Inquiries in Reading Research and Instruction, National Reading Conference, Rochester, 42-47.
[8]  Williams, A.R. (2011) Using Text Messaging to Summarize Text. STRATE Journal, 21, 24-28.
[9]  Grosseck, G. and Holotescu, C. (2008) Can We Use Twitter for Educational Activities? 4th International Scientific Conference, eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest, 17-18 April 2008. http://portaldoprofessor.mec.gov.br/storage/materiais/0000012008.pdf
[10]  Borau, K., Ullrich, C., Feng, J. and Shen, R. (2009) Microblogging for Language Learning: Using Twitter to Train Communicative and Cultural Competence. International Conference on Web-Based Learning 2009, Aachen, 19-21 August 2009, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03426-8_10
[11]  Harmandaoglu, E. (2012) The Use of Twitter in Language Learning and Teaching. International Conference “ICT for LanguageLearning”, 5th Edition, Florence, 15-16 November 2012. https://conference.pixel-online.net/conferences/ICT4LL2012/common/download/Paper_pdf/211-IBT41-FP-Harmandaoglu-ICT2012.pdf
[12]  Elfatah, M. and Ahmed, A. (2015) The Effect of Twitter on Developing Writing Skills in English as a Foreign Language. Arab World English Journal, No. 2, 134-149.
[13]  Bean, T.W. and Steenwyk, F.L. (1984) The Effect of Three Forms of Summarization Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Summary Writing and Comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968409547523
[14]  Yu, G. (2008) Reading to Summarize in English and Chinese: A Tale of Two Languages? Language Testing, 25, 521-551. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265532208094275
[15]  Pakzadian, M. and Rasekh, A. (2012) The Effect of Using Summarization Strategies on Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension. English Linguistics Reasearch, 1, 118-125. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v1n1p118
[16]  Chou, M. (2012) Implementing Keyword and Question Generation Approaches in Teaching EFL Summary Writing. English Language Teaching, 5, 36-41. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n12p36
[17]  Kurtz, J. (2009) Twittering about Learning: Using Twitter in an Elementary Schoolclassroom. Horace, 25, 1-4.
[18]  Antenos-Conforti, E. (2009) Microblogging on Twitter: Social Networking in Intermediate Italian Classes. In: Lomicka, L. and Lords, G., Eds., The Next Generation: Social Networking and Online Collaboration in Foreign Language Learning, Computer-Assisted Language Instruction Consortium, San Macros, 59-90.
[19]  Cheng, H.Y. (2012) Apply Twitter to EFL Reading and Writing in A Taiwanese College Setting. PhD. Thesis, Indiana State University Terre Haute, Terre Haute.
[20]  Mcneil, J. and Donant, L. (1982) Summarization Strategy for Improving Reading Comprehension. In: Niles, J.A. and Harris, L.A., Eds., New Inquiries in Reading Research and Instruction, National Reading Conference, Rochester, 215-219.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

微信:OALib Journal