全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Stoicism, a Philosophical Basis for Ecology?

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1107237, PP. 1-14

Subject Areas: Philosophy

Keywords: Stoicism, Universal Sympathy, Oikei?sis, Virtue, Ecology

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Through its ideal of “living in harmony with nature”, the Portico appears to be a philosophy that invites men to take the relationship with the world seriously. In order to achieve wisdom, the essential mark of which is sobriety, it has established principles, some of which seems to have an ecological value. While considering nature as an organic and spiritual entity which parts together form a whole, stoicism posits that it constitutes the destiny whose laws are inescapable and instructs men never to rebel against the already established order but always to seek the best way to collaborate with it so as not to suffer the evils of their action. With the principle of “universal sympathy”, he adds that everything is interwined and interdependent so that one cannot touch other elements of the cosmos without acting on the whole. Through the principle of oikei?sis, i.e. the appropriation of oneself, a familiarity with what is close, extending from the human species to other natural beings, to the whole earth, develops. Apart from all these doctrinal considerations, we discover paradoxically that Seneca’s work conceals several clues relating to the environmental problems. In this sense, it would be difficult to deny that the philosophy of the Portico has nothing to do with the foundation of ecology. Rather, its interest would lie, in terms of effectiveness, in the education of virtue, consisting of a habitus animi, a disposition of the soul in a certain way, which naturally implies ecological behaviour.

Cite this paper

Alladakan, K. (2021). Stoicism, a Philosophical Basis for Ecology?. Open Access Library Journal, 8, e7237. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107237.

References

[1]  Duhot, J.-J. (2003) Epictetus and Stoic Wisdom. Albin Michel, Paris.
[2]  Fedeli, P. (2005) Ecologie Antique, Translated by Isabelle Cogitore. Infolio, Paris.
[3]  Ferry, L. (2006) Learning to Live. Plon, Paris.
[4]  Housounon-Tolin, P. (2011) Rendez-vous chez Sénèque. L’Harmattan, Paris.
[5]  Seneca (1993) Entretiens. Letters to Lucilius. R. Laffont, Paris.
[6]  Bridoux, A. (1966) Le sto?cisme et son influence. Vrin, Paris.
[7]  Laurand, V. (2005) La sympathie universelle: Union et separation. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 4, 517-535. https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.054.0517
[8]  Desroches, D. (2014) La Philosophie comme mode de vie. Presses de l’Université de Laval, Québec.
[9]  Pseudo-Plutarque (1993) Opinions des philosophes, Translated by Lachenaud G. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
[10]  Seneca (1961) Questions naturelles, tome I, traduit par Paul Oltramare. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
[11]  Seneca (1940) Questions Naturelles, Translated by Fran?ois and Pierre. Richard. Garnier et Frères, Paris.
[12]  Marc, A. (1953) Pensées, Text Established and Translated by A.I. Trannoy. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
[13]  Grimal, P. (1991) Sénèque ou conscience de l’empire. Fayard, Paris.
[14]  Levy, C. (1997) Les philosophies hellénistiques. Le livre de Poche, Paris.
[15]  Rodis-Lewis, G. (1970) La morale sto?cienn. PUF, Paris.
[16]  Seneca (1923) Consolations à ma mère, Translated by René Waltz. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
[17]  Sneca (1972) Des Bienfaits, tome II, Translated by Fran?ois Prechac. Les Belles Lettres, Paris.

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413