All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99


Effects of Nitrogen Rates on Cotton under Different Plant Available Water Capacity Sites in Pyawbwe, Central Dry Zone of Myanmar

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1107137, PP. 1-20

Subject Areas: Plant Science

Keywords: Cotton, Yield, Plant Available Water Capacities, Water Use Efficiency, Nitrogen, Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


Soil water content and nutrient availability are two main factors of limiting plant growth and productivity in an uncertain rainfall area likes central dry zone of Myanmar (CDZ). The aim of this research was to observe the effects of nitrogen (N) rates on rainfed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under different plant available water capacity (PAWC) sites. The field experiments were conducted during post-monsoon season 2019 at two sites, Pawaingyoe and Kokkokhahla, of Pyawbwe Township having different PAWC. In both sites, six levels of N rate (T1 = 0, T2 = 60, T3 = 90, T4 = 120, T5 = 150 and T6 = 180 kg N ha-1) were laid out in randomized complete block design with four replications and cotton variety Ngwechi-6 was tested. The effects of N rates on growth, yield, residual soil NO3--N, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), water use efficiency (WUE) and benefit cost ratio (BCR) were examined. Results showed that PAWC, soil N and OM levels of the clay loam soil from Pawaingyoe was higher than those of the sandy loam soil from Kokkokhahla. In Pawaingyoe, maximum seed cotton yield (2364 kg ha-1), NUE, WUE, BCR and lower residual soil NO3--N were achieved by T2 (60 kg N ha-1). In Kokkokhahla, maximum seed cotton yield (1976 kg ha-1), WUE, BCR and higher residual soil NO3--N were found in T4 (120 kg N ha-1), however, which were followed by T3 (90 kg N ha-1) with the statistically similar seed cotton yield (1787 kg ha-1), the maximum NUE and lower residual soil NO3--N. Therefore, it may be assumed that T2 (60 kg N ha-1) was the most suitable rate for Pawaingyoe site while within the range between T3 and T4 (90 to 120 kg N ha-1) was appropriate for Kokkokhahla. The finding of this study could be contributed some suggestions to the recommendation for cotton N rates under similar circumstances.

Cite this paper

Win, T. Z. , Than, A. A. , Ngwe, K. and Khaing, A. A. (2021). Effects of Nitrogen Rates on Cotton under Different Plant Available Water Capacity Sites in Pyawbwe, Central Dry Zone of Myanmar. Open Access Library Journal, 8, e7137. doi:


[1]  Myanmar National Census Report (MNCR) (2014) The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census: Mandalay Region, Sagaing Region and Magway Region. Department of Population, Ministry of Immigration and Population, Nay Pyi Taw.
[2]  Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2010) The Development Study on Sustainable Agricultural and Rural Development for Poverty Reduction Programme in the Central Dry Zone of the Union of Myanmar. Sanyu Consultants Inc., Tokyo.
[3]  Wang, B., Liu, D., Asseng, S., Macadam, I. and Yu, Q. (2017) Modelling Wheat Yield Change under CO2 Increase, Heat and Water Stress in Relation to Plant Available Water Capacity in Eastern Australia. European Journal of Agronomy, 90, 152-161.
[4]  Ritchie, J. (1981) Water Dynamics in the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere System. Plant and Soil, 58, 81-96.
[5]  Dalgliesh, N.P. and Foale, M.A. (1998) Soil Matters (Monitoring Soil Water and Nutrients in Drying Farming). Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit, CSIRO, Toowoomba.
[6]  Pye Tin (2003) Myanmar’s Perspective on Increasing Cotton Production in Light of Global Production Changes. Institute of Development Economics, Chiba.
[7]  Prasad, R. and Power, J.F. (1995) Nitrification Inhibitors for Agriculture, Health and Environment. Advance Agronomy, 54, 233-281.
[8]  Singh, J. and Mannikar, N.D. (1988) Studies on Nitrogen Transformation in Vertisol as Influenced by Different N Carriers and Its Effect on Growth, Yield and Uptake in Rainfed Cotton. In: Classification, Management and Use Potential of Swell Shrink Soils, Oxford IBH, New Delhi, 207-210.
[9]  Hou, Z., Li, P., Li, B., Gong, Z. and Wang, Y. (2007) Effects of Fertigation Scheme on N Uptake and N Use Efficiency in Cotton. Plant Soil, 290, 115-126.
[10]  Blaise, D., Venugopalan, M.V., Singh, J.V. and Raju, A.R. (2013) Fertilizer Best Management Practices in Cotton. Indian Journal of Fertilisers, 9, 110-119.
[11]  Mitchell, C.C. (2010) Research-Based Soil Testing and Recommendations for Cotton on Coastal Plain Soils. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 410.
[12]  Di Paolo, E. and Rinaldi, M. (2008) Yield Response of Corn to Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilization in a Mediterranean Environment. Field Crop Research, 105, 202-210.
[13]  Myanmar Information Management Unit (MIMU) (a) (b)
[14]  Gregory, P.J. (1991) Concept of Water Use Efficiency. In: Harris, H.C., Cooper, P.J.M. and Pala, M., Eds., Soil and Crop Management for the Improved Water Use Efficiency in Rainfed Areas, ICARDA, Beirut, 9-20.
[15]  Novoa, R. and Loomis, R. (1981) Nitrogen and Plant Production. In: Soil Water and Nitrogen in Mediterranean-Type Environments, Springer, Berlin, 177-204.
[16]  Amooh, M.K. and Bonsu, M. (2015) Effects of Soil Texture and Organic Matter on Evaporative Loss of Soil Moisture. Journal of Global Agriculture and Ecology, 3, 152-161.
[17]  McCarthy, J.J., Canziani, O.F., Leary, N.A., Dokken, D.J. and White, K.S. (2001) Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[18]  Fan, J., Hao, M. and Malhi, S.S. (2010) Accumulation of Nitrates in the Soil Profile and Its Implications for the Environment under Dry Land Agriculture, China. A Review. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 90, 429-440.
[19]  Aronsson, H., Torstensson, G. and Bergstr?m, L. (2007) Leaching and Crop Uptake of N, P and K from a Clay Soil with Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems. Soil Use and Management, 23, 71-81.
[21]  Mukand, S., Brarand, Z.S. and Sharma, P.K. (1989) Growth and Yield of Cotton in Relation to Nitrogen Rates and Scheduling of Last Irrigation. Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University, 26, 14-18.
[22]  Bell, P.F., Boquet, D.J., Millhollon, E., Moore, S., Ebelhar, W., Mitchell, C.C., et al. (2003) Relationships between Leaf Blade Nitrogen and Relative Seed Cotton Yields. Crop Science, 43, L1367-L1374.
[23]  Khan, M.D., Hassan, M., Khan, M.A. and Ibrahim, M. (1993) Effect of Different Doses and Times of Application of N on Cotton Variety S-12 Yield and Yield Components. The Pakistan Cottons, 37, 91-96.
[24]  Ismail, S. and Ozawa, K. (2007) Improvement of Crop Yield, Soil Moisture Distribution and Water Use Efficiency in Sandy Soils by Clay Application. Applied Clay Science, 37, 81-89.
[25]  Dou, F., Soriano, J., Tabien, R. and Chen, K. (2016) Soil Texture and Cultivar Effects on Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Grain Yield, Yield Components and Water Productivity in Three Water Regimes. PLoS ONE, 11, e0150549.
[26]  Dang, T.H. (1999) Effects of Fertilization on Water Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat in Arid Highland. Eco-Agriculture Research, 7, 28-31. (In Chinese)
[27]  Brown, P.L. (1971) Water Use and Soil Water Depletion by Dryland Winter Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization. Agronomy Journal, 63, 43-46.
[28]  Fan, M., Shen, J., Yuan, L., Jiang, R., Chen, X., Davies, W.J. and Zhang, F. (2012) Improving Crop Productivity and Resource Use Efficiency to Ensure Food Security and Environmental Quality in China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 13-24.
[29]  Gastal, F., Lemaire, G., Durand, J.L. and Louarn, G. (2015) Quantifying Crop Responses to Nitrogen and Avenues to Improve Nitrogen-Use Efficiency. In: Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy, Academic Press, San Diego, 161-206.
[30]  Keeney, D.R. (1982) Nitrogen Management for Maximum Efficiency and Minimum Pollution Farmed Soils, Fertilizer, Agro-Ecosystems. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.
[31]  Kerby, T.A. and Adams, F. (1985) Potassium Nutrition of Cotton. In: Potassium in Agriculture, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 843-860.
[32]  Wang, E., Cresswell, H., Xu, J. and Jiang, Q. (2009) Capacity of Soils to Buffer Impact of Climate Variability and Value of Seasonal Forecasts. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149, 38-50.
[33]  Oliver, Y.M. and Robertson, M.J. (2009) Quantifying the Benefits of Accounting for Yield Potential in Spatially and Seasonally Responsive Nutrient Management in a Mediterranean Climate. Soil Research, 47, 114-126.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal