全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Sparse Recovery Diagnosis Method Applied to Hybrid Dynamical System: The Case of Three-Phase DC-AC Inverter for Wind Turbine

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1106776, PP. 1-15

Subject Areas: Electric Engineering

Keywords: Sparse Recovery Diagnostic, Hybrid Dynamical System, Left-Invertibility, Restricted Isometry Property

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Power electronic systems tend to be great contributors to faults in many applications especially wind turbines because they are exposed to harsh operation conditions in height. Thus, a great attention has been paid to fault diagnosis technologies. In this paper, the concept of an exact recovery under a sparse fault assumption is applied to the diagnosis of three-phase DC-AC power electronic inverter, this method is denoted as Sparse Recovery Diagnosis (SRD). This method has the advantage to reconstruct on-line a vector of numerous faults from a few system measurements and with finite-time convergence. In this paper, the concept of an exact recovery under a sparse fault assumption is applied to the diagnosis of three-phase DC-AC power electronic inverter, this method is denoted as Sparse Recovery Diagnosis (SRD). In order to apply the proposed method, it is first necessary to have a dynamical modeling without and with each considered fault. After that, roughly speaking, some assumptions (Sparsity, Restrictive Isometry Property) are necessary with respect to the influence of the fault on the measured signals, in order to apply an exact SRD method. The algorithm used in this paper is based on homogeneous observer. Moreover, in order to take into account the quality of the measured noisy signals, the homogeneity degree is variable. The paper ends by some simulation results on a case study which highlight the well founded of the proposed algorithm with respect to previous algorithms that did not consider that the measurement is noisy.

Cite this paper

Torki, W. , Barbot, J. , Ghanes, M. and Sbita, L. (2020). Sparse Recovery Diagnosis Method Applied to Hybrid Dynamical System: The Case of Three-Phase DC-AC Inverter for Wind Turbine . Open Access Library Journal, 7, e6776. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106776.

References

[1]  Liu, W., Tang, B., Han, J., Lu, X., Hu, N., and He, Z. (2015) The Structure Healthy Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis Methods in Wind Turbines: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 466-472.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.005
[2]  Kamel, R.M. (2014) Effect of Wind Generation System Types on Micro-Grid (MG) Fault Performance during Both Standalone and Grid Connected Modes. Energy Conversion and Management, 79, 232-245.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.009
[3]  Spinato, F., Tavner, P.J., van Bussel, G.J.W. and Koutoulakos, E. (2009) Reliability of Wind Turbine Subassemblies. IET Renewable Power Generation, 3, 387-401.
https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2008.0060
[4]  Yang, S., Bryant, A., Mawby, P., Xiang, D., Ran, L. and Tavner, P. (2011) An Industry-Based Survey of Reliability in Power Electronic Converters. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 47, 1441-1451.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2011.2124436
[5]  Ding, S. (2008) Model-Based Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Design Schemes, Algorithms, and Tools. Springer-Verlag, London.
[6]  Zhang, D., Wang, F., Burgos, R., Kern, J., El-Barbari, S. and Boroyevich, D. (2009) Internal Fault Detection and Isolation for Paralleled Voltage Source Converters. 2009 Twenty-Fourth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, Washington DC, 15-19 February 2009, 833-839.
https://doi.org/10.1109/APEC.2009.4802758
[7]  de Araujo Ribeiro, R., Jacobina, C., da Silva, E. and Lima, A. (2003) Fault Detection of Open-Switch Damage in Voltage-Fed PWM Motor Drive Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron, 18, 587-593.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2003.809351
[8]  Chowdhury, F. and Aravena, J. (1998) A Modular Methodology for Fast Fault Detection and Classification in Power Systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 6, 623-634.
https://doi.org/10.1109/87.709497
[9]  Turpin, C., Baudesson, P., Richardeau, F., Forest, F. and Meynard, T. (2002) Fault Management of Multicell Converters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 49, 988-997.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2002.803196
[10]  Masrur, M.A., Chen, Z. and Murphey, Y. (2010) Intelligent Diagnosis of Open and Short Circuit Faults in Electric Drive Inverters for Real-Time Applications. IET Power Electronics, 3, 279-291.
https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-pel.2008.0362
[11]  Silverman, L. (1969) Inversion of Multivariable Linear Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 14, 270-276.
[12]  Sain, M. and Massey, J. (1969) Invertibility of Linear Time-Invariant Dynamical Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 14, 141-149.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1969.1099133
[13]  Barbot, J.-P., Boutat, D. and Floquet, T. (2009) An Observation Algorithm for Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Inputs. Automatica, 45, 1970-1974.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.04.009
[14]  Sun, X. and Zhang, J. (2014) An Exact First-Order Algorithm for Decentralized Consensus Optimization.
[15]  Elad, M., Figueiredo, M.A. and Ma, Y. (2010) On the Role of Sparse and Redundant Representations in Image Processing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98, 972-982.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2009.2037655
[16]  Wong, K.I., Vong, C.M., Wong, P.K. and Luo, J. (2015) Sparse Bayesian Extreme Learning Machine and Its Application to Biofuel Engine Performance Prediction. Neuro Computing, 149, 397-404.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2013.09.074
[17]  Majumdar, A., Ansari, N., Aggarwal, H. and Biyani, P. (2016) Impulse Denoising for Hyper-Spectral Images a Blind Compressed Sensing Approach. Signal Processing, 119, 136-141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.07.019
[18]  Nateghi, S., Shtessel, Y., Barbot, J.-P., Zheng, G. and Yu, L. (2018) Cyber-Attack Reconstruction via Sliding Mode Differentiation and Sparse Recovery Algorithm: Electrical Power Networks Application. 15th International Workshop on Variable Structure Systems (VSS), Graz, Austria, 9-11 July 2018, 285-290.
https://doi.org/10.1109/VSS.2018.8460426
[19]  Wang, H., Ke, Y., Song, L., Tang, G. and Chen, P. (2016) A Sparsity-Promoted Decomposition for Compressed Fault Diagnosis of Roller Bearings. Sensors, 16, 1524.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s16091524
[20]  Huang, W., Sun, H. and Wang, W. (2017) Resonance-Based Sparse Signal Decomposition and Its Application in Mechanical Fault Diagnosis: A Review. Sensors, 17, 1279.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s17061279
[21]  Yu, L., Zheng, G. and Barbot, J.-P. (2017) Dynamical Sparse Recovery with Finite-Time Convergence. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 65, 6146-6157.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2017.2745468
[22]  Ding, X., Poon, J., ?elanovi?, I. and Dominguez-Garcia, A.D. (2013) Fault Detection and Isolation Filters for Three-Phase AC-DC Power Electronics Systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 60, 1038-1051.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2012.2221222
[23]  Levant, A. (2005) Homogeneity Approach to High-Order Sliding Mode Design. Automatica, 41, 823-830.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2004.11.029
[24]  Balavoine, A., Rozell, C.J. and Romberg, J. (2013) Convergence Speed of a Dynamical System for Sparse Recovery. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 61, 4259-4269.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2013.2271482
[25]  Candès, E.J. and Wakin, M.B. (2008) An Introduction to Compressive Sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25, 21-30.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2007.914731
[26]  Balavoine, A., Romberg, J. and Rozell, C. (2013) Correction to Convergence and Rate Analysis of Neural Networks for Sparse Approximation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 25, 1595-1596.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2292700
[27]  Ren, J., Yu, L., Lyu, C., et al. (2019) Dynamical Sparse Signal Recovery with Fixed-Time Convergence. Signal Processing, 162, 65-74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.04.010
[28]  Ghanes, M., Barbot, J.P., Fridman, L. and Levant, A. (2017) A Novel Differentiator: A Compromise between Super Twisting and Linear Algorithms. 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Melbourne, 12-15 December, 2017, 5415-5419.
https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2017.8264460

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413