All Title Author
Keywords Abstract

Publish in OALib Journal
ISSN: 2333-9721
APC: Only $99


Review Paper on University Teachers Performance Appraisal

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1106509, PP. 1-18

Subject Areas: Education

Keywords: University Teachers, Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, Assessment Criteria

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib


The purpose of the review paper is to summarize and analyze the previously published articles on the university teachers’ performance appraisal. The researcher reviewed different articles on the title stated above. The primary aim of university performance evaluation system should be institutional improvement through quality assurance in every process of action. Teachers’ job performance assessment criteria should be objective with complex judgment of work performance. The assessment should be based to improve credibility of performance assessment. Feedback from immediate supervisors, colleagues and students is helpful to strengthen the professional development of university teachers.

Cite this paper

Mohammed, A. A. (2020). Review Paper on University Teachers Performance Appraisal. Open Access Library Journal, 7, e6509. doi:


[1]  Dhamne, A., Jadhav, D. and Somhan Shi, M. (2017) Performance Based Appraisal System for Teachers of University/Colleges. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4, 1-4.
[2]  Aguinis, H. and Pierce, C. (2007) Enhancing the Relevance of Organizational Behavior by Embracing Performance Management Research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 139-145.
[3]  Fletcher, C. (2001) Performance Appraisal and Management. The Developing Research Agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 473.
[4]  Murphy, K.R. and Cleveland, J.N. (1995) Understanding Performance Appraisal. Social Organizational and Goal Based Perspectives. SAGE Publications, London.
[5]  Aguinis, H. (2009) An Expanded View of Performance Management. In: Performance Management: Putting Research into Action, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 41-44.
[6]  Day, C. (2013) The New Lives of Teachers. Routledge, London.
[7]  Zbar, V., Marshal, G. and Power, P. (2007) Better Schools, Better Teachers, Better Results: A Handbook for Improved Performance Management in Your School. Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne.
[8]  Grote, R.C. (2002) The Performance Appraisal Question and Answer Book: A Survival Guide for Managers. American Management Association, New York.
[9]  Anninos, L.N. (2007) University Performance Evaluation Approaches: The Case of Ranking Systems. PhD Candidate in Business Administration, University of Piraeus, Hellas.
[10]  Miankheil, A.K., Nawaz, A., Khan, S. and Wajidi, F.A. (2012) University Teachers Performance Evaluation: Investigating the Demographic Impacts on the Evaluators.
[11]  Bogt, H. and Scapens, R.W. (2012) Performance Management in Universities of Effects of the Transition to More Quantitative Measurement Systems. European Accounting Review, 21, 451-497.
[12]  Bedgood, R. and Donovan, J. (2012) University Performance Evaluation. What Are We Really Measuring? Studies in Higher Education, 63, 529-547.
[13]  Hattie, J. and Mash, H.W. (1996) The Relationship between Research and Teaching. A Meta Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507-542.
[14]  Kleiman, L.S. and Durham, R.L. (1981) Performance Appraisal Promotion and Courts: A Critical Review. Personnel Psychology, 34, 103-121.
[15]  Amin, H. and Khan, A.R. (2009) Acquiring Knowledge for Evaluation of Teachers’ Performance in Higher Education Using a Questionnaire. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 2, 1-18.
[16]  Halepota, J.A. and Irani, Z. (2010) The Impact of Organizational Antecedents on Employee Job Satisfaction. An Empirical Evaluation of Public Sector in Pakistan. Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, Abu Dhabi, 12-13 April 2010.
[17]  Aslam, H.D. (2011) Performance Evaluation of Teachers in Universities, Contemporary Issues and Challenges in Pakistan Proceedings of the 211 International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Change. International Association for Teaching and Learning (IATEL), Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan, 339-362.
[18]  Wooltolk, A., Davis, H. and Pape, S. (2007) Teachers Knowledge, Beliefs and Thinking. In: Alxander, P.A. and Winne, P.H., Eds., Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2nd Edition, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, 715-737.
[19]  Armstrong, M. and Baron, A. (2005) Managing Performance: Performance Management in Action. CIPD, London.
[20]  Martinez, J. (2000) Assessing Quality, Outcome and Performance Management. Workshop on Global Health Workforce Strategy, Annecy, 9-12 December 2000, 1-30.
[21]  Pei, W.C. (2010) Comparative Analysis of Special Education to Teacher Training in France and Norway: How Effective, Areas Taught and Recommendation for Improvement (Master Thesis Abstract). Journal for Educators, Teaching and Trainers, 1, 87-95.
[22]  We, D.M. (2010) Out of the Crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge, 507 p.
[23]  Scholtes, P.R. (1993) Total Quality or Performance Appraisal: Choose One. Nationally Productivity Review, 12, 349-363.
[24]  Semler, R. (1989) Managing without Managers. Harvard Business Review, September-October, 10 p.
[25]  Whiting, S.W., Podsakoff, P.M. and Pierce, J.R. (2008) Effects of Task Performance, Helping Voice and Organizational Loyalty on Performance Appraisal Ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 125-139.
[26]  Salanova, M., Agut, S. and Peiro, J.M. (2005) Linking Organizational Resources and Work Engagement to Employee Performance and Customer Loyalty: The Mediation of Service Climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217-1227.
[27]  Kuvaus, B. (2006) Performance Appraisal Satisfaction and Employee Outcomes; Mediating and Moderating Roles of Work Motivation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 504-522.
[28]  Poon, J.M. (2004) Effects of Performance Appraisal Politics on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention. Personnel Review, 33, 322-334.
[29]  Hall, E.R. (2010) Symposium Perspectives on University Performance Assessment. UNN, Tokyo.
[30]  Bolskova, M., et al. (2003) Management and Development of Human Potential, Applying Motivation Accent in Process of Work with People. EDIS Publisher of the University of Zilina, Zilina.
[31]  UNIZA (University of Zilinia in Zilinia) (2003) Methodological Regulation No 1/2003 for Complex Job Performance Assessment of the University of Zilinia Employees. Zilinia University of Zilinia, Zilinia.
[32]  Anjum, A., Yasmeen, K. and Khan, B. (2011) Performane Appraisal Systems in Public Sector Universities of Pakistan. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 1, 41-51.
[33]  Murphy, R.R. and Opre, D. (2001) Evaluator Personal Academic, Cognate, Crier Compartment. Associatia de stiinte Cognitive din Romania, Clu-Napuca.
[34]  Bogathy, Z. (2007) Manual de technici si metode in psihologia muncii organizaztionala. Lasi. Polirom.
[35]  Brutus, S., et al. (2013) Self-Reported Limitations and Future Directions in Scholar Reports. Analysis and Recommendations: Journal of Management, 39, 48-75.


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us


微信:OALib Journal