Chinese characters contain three levels of visual information: strokes, radicals, and structures. Stroke, as the basic unit of Chinese characters, is the foundation of the formation of Chinese characters. Some research has shown that strokes can enhance the semantic and orthographic representation in the process of Chinese character acquisition. This shows that the processing of Chinese characters is based on feature processing. This is consistent with the feature processing theory of letter and object recognition. Recent research on visual recognition shows that the recognition of letters and words is based on the termination and the other features (vertices and midsegment) used in object recognition. In this study, we used delayed segment technique on Chinese character recognition to examine the importance of terminations, vertices and midsegment in different masking degree. Experiment 1 selected about 43 high frequency Chinese characters with left-right structures and asked the participants to naming Chinese characters. In experiment 1, we try to examine the importance of terminations, vertices and midsegments based on line unit and consider the degree of masking these features. It was found that the main effect of masking degree was significant. The masking of 35% and 55% of the features makes the RTs significantly longer. The main effect of feature type was significant. Masking vertices and midsegment can make RTs significantly longer. But termination didn’t show its feature effect in experiment 1. When masking these three features (vertices, midsegment and termination) in experiment 1, the features are based on line units, which may destroy the integrity of strokes in Chinese characters. That termination effects couldn’t be obvious in experiment 1 may be caused by this reason. To verify this, in experiment 2, we explore the vertices, midsegment and termination based on stroke units. The results show that the main effect of masking degree was significant, and the RTs were longer by masking 35% and 55% degree. The main effect of feature types was significant. RTs on character recognition are significantly longer by masking the vertices, midsegment and termination. This shows that the vertices, midsegment and termination based on stroke unit are also important in Chinese character recognition. Based on the above research results, it can be seen that the key features on Chinese character recognition are in line with the neuronal recycling hypothesis. According to neuronal recycling hypothesis, human’s ability to learn from culture depends on the retrieval of preexisting brain circuits, and the key features in word recognition may be derived from our key features in object processing. The hook is considered to be a special termination in Chinese characters. The results of experiment 2 also emphasized the key role of hook features in character recognition.
Cite this paper
Luo, F. and Zhang, Y. (2020). The role of features in Chinese character recognition. Open Access Library Journal, 7, e6358. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106358.
Flores d’Arcais, G.B. (1994) Order of Strokes Writing as a Cue for Retrieval in Reading Chinese Characters. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 337-355.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449408406519
Yan, G., et al. (2012) Using Stroke Removal to Investigate Chinese Character Identification during Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements. Reading and Writing, 25, 951-979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9295-x
Tseng, S.-C., Chang, L. and Hsiang, W.C.-C. (1965) An Informational Analysis of the Chinese Language: I. The Reconstruction of the Removed Strokes of the Ideograms in Printed Sentence-Texts. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 9, 11-20.
Zhang, J.W., Zhang, H.P. and Zhang, M. (2002) The Effect of the Complexity and Repetition of the Strokes on the Cognition of the Strokes and the Chinese Characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 34, 7-11.
Selfridge, O. (1959) Pandemonium: A Paradigm for Learning, Proceedings of Symposium on the Mechanization of Thought Processes. National Physics Laboratory, Teddington.
Fiset, D., et al. (2008) Features for Identification of Uppercase and Lowercase Letters. Psychological Science, 19, 1161-1168.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02218.x
Lanthier, S.N., et al. (2009) Not All Visual Features Are Created Equal: Early Processing in Letter and Word Recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.67
Rosa, E., Perea, M. and Enneson, P. (2016) The Role of Letter Features in Visual-Word Recognition: Evidence from a Delayed Segment Technique. Acta Psychologica, 169, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.016
Fiset, D., et al. (2009) The Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Visual Letter Recognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290802421160
Chang, Y., Furber, S. and Welbourne, S. (2012) Modelling Normal and Impaired Letter Recognition: Implications for Understanding Pure Alexic Reading. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2773-2788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.031
Lee, H.-W., Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. (2002) The Processing of Consonants and Vowels in Reading: Evidence from the Fast Priming Paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 9, 766-772. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196333
Carreiras, M., et al. (2008) Are Vowels and Consonants Processed Differently? Event-Related Potential Evidence with a Delayed Letter Paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21023
Lee, H.-W., Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. (2001) The Relative Contribution of Consonants and Vowels to Word Identification during Reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2725
Perea, M., Comesa？a, M. and Soares, A.P. (2012) Does the Advantage of the Upper Part of Words Occur at the Lexical Level? Memory and Cognition, 40, 1257-1265.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0219-z
Petit, J.-P. and Grainger, J. (2002) Masked Partial Priming of Letter Perception. Visual Cognition, 9, 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280042000207
Dehaene, S. (2005) Evolution of Human Cortical Circuits for Reading and Arithmetic: The “Neuronal Recycling” Hypothesis. In: Dehaene, S., Duhamel, J.R., Hauser, M. and Rizzolatti, G., Eds., From Monkey Brain to Human Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, 133-157.
Cohen, L., et al. (2000) The Visual Word Form Area: Spatial and Temporal Characterization of an Initial Stage of Reading in Normal Subjects and Posterior Split-Brain Patients. Brain, 123, 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.2.291
Gaillard, R., et al. (2006) Direct Intracranial, FMRI, and Lesion Evidence for the Causal Role of Left Inferotemporal Cortex in Reading. Neuron, 50, 191-204.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.031
Hasson, U., et al. (2002) Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas. Neuron, 34, 479-490.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00662-1
Vinckier, F., et al. (2007) Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System. Neuron, 55, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.031
Behrmann, M., Nelson, J. and Sekuler, E. (1998) Visual Complexity in Letter-by-Letter Reading: Pure Alexia Is Not Pure. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1115-1132.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00005-0
Cohen, L. and Dehaene, S. (2004) Specialization within the Ventral Stream: The Case for the Visual Word Form Area. Neuroimage, 22, 466-476.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.049
