In electro-magnetic welding (EMW) process, optimization of process parameters is very important aspect. Optimization process leads to generation of mechanically and metallurgically sound interface weld without overstressing tool coil and electromagnetic welding equipment. This work investigates the effect of four important process parameters (Magnetic field in coil ID, Frequency of current pulse, Taper angle of SS316 L (N) plug and Stand-off distance between D9 tube and SS316 L (N) plug) on weld quality and their optimization. Multiple experiments were conducted to arrive at optimized value of above mentioned process parameters which generated heat effected zone free, mechanically and metallurgically qualified interface weld of reasonable length. The welded interface revealed a wavy morphology of 35 - 40 μm as maximum crest height and lowest helium leak rate of 4 × 10?10 m?bar?L/s. Experimental results have proved that 27 T magnetic field is needed in coil ID to produce optimum weld quality at interface. Experimental data has proved that at higher frequency, similar quality of electro-magnetic welding can be obtained at lower bank energy. Experimental results have also proved that taper angle of 8? produces weld interface at lowest possible magnetic field in coil ID. It is also proved experimentally that 0.5 mm stand-off distance produces better weld length as compared to no stand-off distance and 1.0 mm stand-off distance.
Cite this paper
Kumar, S. , Dey, G. K. and Sharma, A. (2020). Optimization of Process Parameters in Electro-Magnetic Welding of D9 Tube to SS316 L (N) Plug. Open Access Library Journal, 7, e6346. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106346.
Lueg-Althoff, J., Gies, S., Tekkaya, A.E., Bellmann, J., Beyer, E. and Schulze, S. (2016) Magnetic Pulse Welding of Dissimilar Metals in Tube-to-Tube Configuration. Proceedings of the 9th International Welding Symposium of Japan Welding Society, Tokyo, Japan, 11-14 October 2016, 87-90.
Wu, X. and Shang, J. (2014) An Investigation of Magnetic Pulse Welding of Al/Cu and Interface Characterization. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 136, Article ID: 051002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027917
Kumar, S., Dey, G. and Sharma, A. (2019) An Investigation on Weldability of Flared D9 Tube to Cylindrical SS316L (N) Plug Using Electro-Magnetic Compression Welding. Open Access Library Journal, 6, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105465
Kwee, I., Psyk, V. and Faes, K. (2016) Effect of the Welding Parameters on the Structural and Mechanical Properties of Aluminium and Copper Sheet Joints by Electromagnetic Pulse Welding. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4, 538-561. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2016.44053
Kwee, I. and Faes, K. (2016) Interfacial Morphology and Mechanical Properties of Aluminium to Copper Sheet Joints by Electromagnetic Pulse Welding. Key Engineering Materials, 710, 109-114.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.710.109
Verstraete, J., De Waele, W. and Faes, K. (2011) Magnetic Pulse Welding: Lessons to Be Learned from Explosive Welding. Proceedings of the Conference Sustainable Construction and Design 2011, Department of Mechanical Construction and Production, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 16-17 February 2011
Mannan, S.L., Chetal, S.C., Raj, B. and Bhoje, S.B. (2003) Selection of Materials for Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor. Transactions-Indian Institute of Metals, 56, 155-178.
Kumar, S., Desai, S.V. and Chakravarthy, D.P. (2012) Characterisation of Electromagetic Welding Equipment. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 40, 293-300. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-2012-1592
Kumar, S., Khan, M.R., Saroj, P.C., Sharma, A.R. and Dey, G.K. (2019) Experimental Investigation of Driver Material on Electromagnetic Welding of Alloy D9 SS Tube to SS316L(N) Plug. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 105, 4225-4242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04525-0
Ben-Artzy, A., Stern, A., Frage, N., Shribman, V. and Sadot, O. (2010) Mechanism in Magnetic Pulse Welding. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 37, 397-404.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.07.008