The demand for wood fuels in rural and some urban areas of Ghana keeps on increasing which could lead to forest degradation. The present study sought to produce and characterise briquette made from cocoa pod husk and a mixed sample which comprised of a mixture of cocoa pod husk and sawdust as an alternative source of fuel to reduce the pressure on wood fuels. Simple methods were used to produce the briquette for the study. The physico-chemical properties of the briquettes were conducted at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) where the proximate analysis, ultimate analysis and calorific value of the briquettes were analysed and compared to the controlled sample charcoal produced from “Amire” species (Terminalia ivorensis) using a completely randomized design (CRD) with 3 replications. A survey was also conducted to determine the usability of the briquettes using purposive sampling technique where sixty (60) respondents were given samples of the two different kinds of briquettes produced to use. Results obtained from the ultimate and proximate analysis showed that there were significant differences among the treatments (P < 0.05). Results obtained from the calorific value showed that the mixed briquette (23.6 MJ/Kg) produced significantly (P < 0.05) the highest amount of heat followed by the controlled charcoal (18.5 MJ/Kg) and carbonised cocoa pod husk briquette (16.7 MJ/Kg). Outcomes from the survey showed that (97%) of the respondent used wood fuels for their heating and cooking activities; (98%) of the respondents were ready to use the new briquettes produced if it is made available. From the results obtained, it could be concluded that the briquettes produced from cocoa pod husk and sawdust could help reduce the pressure on wood fuels, reduce deforestation and also provide cleaner fuel for cooking.
Cite this paper
Ofori, P. and Akoto, O. (2020). Production and Characterisation of Briquettes from Carbonised Cocoa Pod Husk and Sawdust. Open Access Library Journal, 7, e6029. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106029.
Goswam, D.Y. and Kreith, F. (2007) Global Energy System. In: Handbook of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420003482.ch1
Akowuah, J.O., Kermausuor, F. and Mitchual, S.J. (2012) Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Market Potential of Sawdust Charcoal Briquette. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-3-20
Phonphuak, N. and Thiansem, S. (2012) Using Charcoal to Increase Properties and Durability of Fired Test Briquettes. Construction and Building Materials, 29, 612-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.018
Amaya, A., Medero, N., Tancredi, N., Silva, H. and Delana, C. (2007) Activated Carbon Briquettes from Biomass Materials. Bioresource Technology, 98, 1635-1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.049
Suhartini, S., Hidayat, N. and Wijaya, S. (2011) Physical Properties Characterization of Fuel Briquette Made from Spent Bleaching Earth. Biomass Bioenergy, 35, 4209-4214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.002
Wilaipon, P. (2007) Density Equation of Bio-Coal Briquettes and Quantity of Maize Cob in Phitsanulok, Thailand. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 1808-1811. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.1808.1811
Ofori-Boateng, C. and Teong-Lee, K. (2013) The Potential of Using Cocoa Pod Husk as Green Solid Base Catalyst for the Trans-Esterification of Soybean Oil into Biodiesel: Effect of Biodiesel on Engine Performance. Chemical Engineering Journal, 200, 395-401. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385894713000867 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.046
Aphonse, N., Ekise, I. and Alphonsine, M. (2012) Comparative Study of Charcoal Yield Produced by Traditional and Improved Kilns: A Case Study of Nyaruguru and Nyamagabe Districts in Southern Province of Rwanda.
Nelson, D.W. and Sommers, L.W. (1982) Total Carbon and Organic Matter. In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. and Keeney, D.R., Eds., Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2, 2nd Edition, No. 9, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science of America, Madison, WI.
Adekunle, J.O., Ibrahim, J.S. and Kucha, E.I. (2014) Proximate and Ultimate Analysis of Biocoal Briquettes of Nigerians Ogboyaga and Okaba Sub-Bituminous Coal. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 7, 114-123. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/15154
Ryemshak, S. and Aliyu, J. (2014) Proximate Analysis, Rheological Properties and Technological Applications of Some Nigeria Coals. International Journal of Industrial Chemistry, 4, 1-7. http://www.indstchem.com https://doi.org/10.1186/2228-5547-4-7
Obernberger, I. and Thek, G. (2004) Physical Characterization and Chemical Composition of Densified Biomass Fuels with Regard to Their Combustion Behaviour. Biomass & Bioenergy, 27, 653-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.07.006
García, R., Pizarro, C., Lavín, A.G. and Bueno, J.L. (2012) Characterization of Spanish Biomass Wastes for Energy Use. Bioresource Technology, 103, 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.004
Aina, O.M., Adetogun, A.C. and Iyiola, K.A. (2009) Heat Energy from Value Added Sawdust Briquette of Albiziazygia. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 2, 42-49. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v2i1.43501
Vyas, D.K., Sayyad, F.G., Khardiwar, M.S. and Kumar, S. (2015) Physicochemical Properties of Briquettes from Different Feedstock. Current World Environment, 10, 263-269. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.10.1.32