Introduction: Poultry production has increased during the past half century throughout the world. In Burkina Faso modern poultry farming is becoming a necessity in view of the growing demand for eggs. Intensive poultry farming is developing rapidly, given that the productivity of local poultry remains very low Because of the low availability and high cost of food. Therefore, it becomes imperative to develop strategies to make modern poultry farming more productive, by finding alternative solutions for feeds. Objective: The study aims to evaluate the effects of diets incorporating mango waste-based feed on the growth parameters of laying hens and biometric parameters of first eggs. Methods: Two hundred and ten (10) hens of the Isa Brown breed were divided into 3 batches (70 chicks per set) and feed with three diets namely mango and maize diet (MMD = lot1), control maize diet (CMD = lot2) and absolute control diet (ACD = lot3) in a feed experiment at INERA research station in Farako-ba, Bobo Dioulasso. Results: The final average weight (FW) gained by the lot1 and lot3 using the diet CMD (1364 ± 114 g) and ACD (1364 ± 115 g), respectively was significantly higher than the lot 2 feed with the MMD diet (1265 ± 117 g) (p < 0.05). The average daily weight gain (ADG) of CMD and ACD was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of the MMD ration. The feed intake (FI) and consumption index (CI) of the MMD ration were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those of CMD and ACD (p > 0.05). Average weight and egg density were similar (p > 0.05) for the three diets. The eggs on the MMD diet were larger (p < 0.05) than those in the ration’s CMD and ACD, but the two later were similar (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Maize can be substituted with mango feed in growing layer diets. Mango waste-based feed is predisposed for better preparation of growing layers for good laying performances. It is an alternative to increase the availability of feed for farm animals including the laying hen.
Cite this paper
Barry, D. , Kiendrebeogo, T. , Sere, M. , Combari, A. , Logténé, Y. M. and Kaboré-Zoungrana, C. Y. (2019). Effects of Mango Wastes-Based Diets on the Growing Parameters of Laying Hens and Biometric Parameters of the Eggs. Open Access Library Journal, 6, e5868. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105868.
Yaro, D. (2011) Effet de la poudre de feuille de Moringa oleifera et de pulpe de fruit de Parkia biglobosa sur les performances de ponte des poules pondeuses. Mémoire d’Ingénieur de conception en vulgarisation agricole. Université Polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso, 50 p. http://www.beep.ird.fr/collect/upb/index/assoc /IDR-2011-YAR-EFF/IDR-2011-YAR-EFF.pdf
Nau, F., Nys, Y., Yamakawa, Y. and Rehault-Godbert, S. (2010) Interêt nutritionnel de l’？uf en alimentation humaine. INRA Productions Animales, 23, 225-236. https://www6.inra.fr/productions-animales_en g/content/download/5738/80971/version/1/ file/Prod_Anim_2010_23_2_12.pdf
Kondombo, S.R., Kwakkel, R.P., Nianogo, A.J. and Singerland, M. (2003) Effects of Local Feedstuff Supplementation on Zootechnic Performances and Nutritional Status of Village Chickens during the End of the Rainy Season in Burkina Faso. Revue d’elevage et de medecine veterinaire des pays tropicaux, 56, 199-204. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aime_Nianogo/ publication/40124758_Effects_of_Local_Feedstuff_Supp lementation_on_Zootechnic_Performances_and_Nutritio nal_Status_of_Village_Chickens_during_the_End_of_the _Rainy_Season_in_Burkina_Faso/links/5527bf080cf2 9b22c9b93e65.pdf https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.9865
Pousga, S., Boly, H., Lindderberg, J.E. and Ogle, B. (2007) Evaluation of Traditional Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), Beer Residues, Shea Nut (Vitellaria paradoxa) Cake and Cotton Seed (Gossypum spp) Cake for Poultry in Burkina Faso: Availability and Amino Acid Digestibility. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6, 666-672. http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/ansinet/ijps/ 2007/666-672.pdf https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2007.666.672
Palo, P.E., Yamoego, V.M.C. and Yanogo, A.J. (1991) Observations preliminaires sur l’utilisation des graines de Parkia biglibosa (Jacq.) Benth. (Nere) pour l’alimentation des pondeuses et des poulets de chair au Burkina Faso. Revue d’elevage et de medecine veterinaire des pays tropicaux, 44, 179-184. http://revues.cirad.fr/index.php/REMVT /article/view/9196
Hien, O.C., Salissou, I., Diarra, B., Sanon, P.P. and Handcock, J.D. (2011) Effets compares de rations à base des varietes de mais ESPOIR et de mais SR21 sur la pro- ductivite du poulet de chair de souche cobb-500. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 12, 1557-1570.
https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ijbcs/
article/view/180992
https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v12i4.4
Dahouda, M., Tolera, S.S., Senou, M., Youssao, A.K.F. and IIambuckers, A. (2009) Les ressources alimentaires non-conventionnelles utilisables pour la production aviaire en Afrique: Valeurs nutritives et contraintes. Annales de medecine veterinaire, 153, 5-21. https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/289 12/1/Les%20ressources%20alimentaires% 20non-conventionnelles.pdf
Kiendrebeogo, T., Mopate, L.Y., Ido, G. and Kabore-Zoungrana, C.-Y. (2013) Procedes de production d’aliments non conventionnels pour porcs à base de dechets de mangues et determination de leurs valeurs alimentaires au Burkina Faso. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 67, 5261-5270. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jab/ article/view/95047 https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v67i0.95047
Kiendrebeogo, T., Mopate, L.Y. and Kabore-Zoungrana, C.-Y. (2018) Effets de rations à base de dechets de mangue sur les performances ponderales et la qualite de la carcasse de porcs Korhogo en croissance au Burkina Faso. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 129, 13039-13049. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jab /article/view/181679 https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v129i1.7
Hoyt, D.F. (1979) Practical Methods of Estimating Volume and Fresh Weight of Bird Eggs. The Auk, 96, 73-77. https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/ journals/auk/v096n01/p0073-p0077.pdf
Augion, S. (2007) Elements sur la biologie de l’OEdicnème criard en Agroecosystèmes intensif et perspectives de conservation. Ecologie, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 44 p.
Sauveur, B. (1988) Reproduction des volailles et production d’oeufs. Ed. Institut Nati. INRA, Paris, 455 p. https://sacomlithefer.firebaseapp.com/28 53409619.pdf
ISA 2009-10 (2009) Guide d’elevage general des pondeuses commerciales Isa brown. 41 p. https://sansdents.com/wp-content/uploads /2019/02/ISA-BROWN-GUIDE-D%E2%80% 99%C3%89L%C3%89VAGE-GENERAL-DES -PONDEUSES-COMMERCIALES.pdf
Coulibaly, Y. (2014) Effects de la variete du mais Espoir sur la productivite des poules pondeuses. Memoire de master en production et industrie animales. UPB/IDR, 70 p. http://www.beep.ird.fr/collect/upb/index/ assoc/IDR-2014-COU-EFF/IDR-2014-COU -EFF.pdf
Robert, H., Galik, B., Biro, D., Rolinec, M., Sinko, M., Jurasek, M., Majlat, M. and Harpasova, H. (2014) The Effect of Pumpkin and Flaxseed Oils on Selected Parameters of Laying Hen’s Performance. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica, 17, 96-99. http://acta.fapz.uniag.sk/journal/index. php/on_line/article/view/112/pdf_16 https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2014.17 .03.96-99
Beghoul, S. (2015) Effets de l’utilisation des cereales et des proteagineux autres que le mais et le soja dans l’alimentation du poulet de chair. 177 p. http://archives.umc.edu.dz/bitstream/handle /123456789/130682/BEG6667.pdf?sequen ce=1&isAllowed=y
Brou, G.K.G., Houndonougbo, F.M., Abo, A.B., Mensah, G.A. and Fantodji, A. (2012) Effet de la variation temporelle de la temperature ambiante journalière sur le poids des oeufs de poules pondeuses ISA Brown en C？te-d’Ivoire. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 6, 2158-2169. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ijbcs/ article/view/85272/75210 https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v6i5.23
Houndonougbo, M.F., Chrysostome, C. and Houndonougbo, V.P. (2012) Perfor- mances bioeconomiques des poulettes alimentees avec des rations à base de feuilles sechees de manioc (Manihot esculenta). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 6, 670-676. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8a1a/581 496dd19da15122024a4d82e620d0bc064.pd f?_ga=2.265188751.1492628228.1570750 133-472848667.1570750133 https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v6i2.11
