全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Statistical Parametric Analysis on Democracy Data

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1105828, PP. 1-18

Subject Areas: Mathematical Statistics

Keywords: Democracy Data

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), collected information from 167 countries of the world to classify each of the countries into four categories of Democracy and they have classified those countries based on the Democracy Index Score (DIS). EIU derived the DIS from the subject data and proceeded descriptively to use the DIS score to classify each of the countries into one of the four types of democracy. In this paper, we have identified the overall probability density function (PDF) of the DIS as well as the PDF of each of the individual type of democracy defined by EIU. Knowing the PDF it can probabilistically characterize the behavior of the overall DIS data and each of the four types of democracy. It is found that the overall PDF of DIS is mixer distribution with their corresponding weights and some of the PDF of individual category follows the same probability density function.

Cite this paper

Bashar, A. K. M. R. and Tsokos, C. P. (2019). Statistical Parametric Analysis on Democracy Data. Open Access Library Journal, 6, e5828. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105828.

References

[1]  Kekic, L. (2007) The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index of Democracy. The Econo-mist, 21, 1-11.
[2]  Walker, M.E., Anonson, J. and Szafron, M. (2014) Economist Intelligence Unit Democracy Index in Relation to Health Services Accessibility: A Regression Analysis. International Health, 7, 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihu064
[3]  Campbell, D.F. (2008) The Basic Concept for the Democracy Ranking of the Quality of Democracy.
[4]  Sung, H.-E. (2004) Democracy and Political Corruption: A Cross-National Comparison. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41, 179-193.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CRIS.0000016225.75792.02
[5]  Economist Intelligence Unit (2015) Democracy Index 2014: Democracy and Its Discontents. Report dell’Economist Intelligence Unit. http://bit.ly/18kEzCt
[6]  Tsokos, C.P. (1972) Probability Distributions: An Introduction to Probability Theory with Applications.
[7]  Joanes, D. and Gill, C. (1998) Comparing Measures of Sample Skewness and Kurtosis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 47, 183-189.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00122
[8]  Massey Jr., F.J. (1951) The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46, 68-78.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769
[9]  Anderson, T.W. and Darling, D.A. (1954) A Test of Goodness of Fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 765-769.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232
[10]  Chernoff, H. and Lehmann, E. (1954) The Use of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in χ2 Tests for Goodness of Fit. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 579-586.
https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728726
[11]  Stephens, M.A. (1974) EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some Comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 730-737.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1974.10480196
[12]  Finkelstein, J.M. and Schafer, R.E. (1971) Improved Goodness-of-Fit Tests. Biometrika, 58, 641-645. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/58.3.641
[13]  Everitt, B.S. (2004) Mixture Distributions-I. In: Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471667196.ess1655

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413