全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Evaluation of Uterine Cavity in Infertile Women: Comparison of Transvaginal Ultrasound, Saline Contrast Hystero-Sonography and Hysteroscopy—A Tunisian Series

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1104826, PP. 1-9

Subject Areas: Gynecology & Obstetrics

Keywords: Hysterosonography, Uterine Cavity Pathologies, Infertility

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The development of uterine pathologies usually involves transvaginal ultrasonography, possibly supplemented by hysteroscopy. Recent technical developments in ultrasound have given rise to a new exploration technique: hysterosonography or ultrasound with contrast enhancement. Hysterosonography has emerged today in the study of the uterine cavity with a precise analysis of the endometrial mucosa and related pathologies. Objectives: To determine the contribution of hysterosonography in uterine cavity pathologies, and appraise the performance of this examination in the evaluation of the uterine cavity by comparing it to vaginal ultrasound and diagnostic hysteroscopy. A retrospective study of 39 hysterosonography examinations was performed in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of Farhat Hached University Hospital Center, Sousse, Tunisia. Included in the study were patients suffering from infertility. During the period of the clinical trial, 39 patients were potential candidates for this study. The mean age of the patients was 31.5 years. In case of hypofertility associated with endometrial polyps, the hysterosonography/histology concordance was of 51.4% (13/24). The statistical values of the hysterosonography were: sensitivity: 76.9%, specificity: 27.2%, VPP: 55.5%, and VPN: 50%. In case of uterine malformation, hysterosonography allowed the diagnosis to be made in three cases, with a sensitivity of 100%, but the number of these abnormalities was limited and the statistical value was low. In clinical practice, combining hysterosonography with transvaginal ultrasound may increase the sensitivity of the latter, thus avoiding unnecessary diagnostic hysteroscopies. It is likely to significantly reduce the indications for diagnostic hysteroscopy, a test that is not devoid of morbidity.

Cite this paper

Briki, R. , Cherif, O. , Chachia, S. , Bibi, M. , Boughizane, S. , Khlifi, A. and Khairi, H. (2018). Evaluation of Uterine Cavity in Infertile Women: Comparison of Transvaginal Ultrasound, Saline Contrast Hystero-Sonography and Hysteroscopy—A Tunisian Series. Open Access Library Journal, 5, e4826. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104826.

References

[1]  Nannini, R., Chelo, E., Branconi, F., Tantini, C. and Scarselli, G.F. (1981) Dynamic Echohysteroscopy: A New Diagnostic Technique in the Study of Female Infertility. Acta Europaea fertilitatis, 12, 165-171.
[2]  Goldstein, S.R. (1994) Use of Ultrasonohysterography for Triage of Perimenopausal Patients with Unexplained Uterine Bleeding. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 170, 565-570.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70228-4
[3]  Laing, F.C., et al. (1980) Ultrasonic Demonstration of Endometrial Fluid Collections Unassociated with Pregnancy. Radiology, 137, 471-474.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.137.2.7433679
[4]  Laifer-Narin, S.L., Ragavendra, N., Lu, D.S., Sayre, J., Perrella, R.R. and Grant, E.G. (1999) Transvaginal Saline Hysterosonography: Characteristics Distinguishing Malignant and Various Benign Conditions. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, 172, 1513-1520.
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.172.6.10350282
[5]  Bernard, J.P., Lecuru, F., Darles, C., Robin, F., De Bievre, P. and Taurelle, R. (1997) Saline Contrast Sonohysterography as First-Line Investigation for Women with Uterine Bleeding. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 10, 121-125.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10020121.x
[6]  Turcotte, G. and Bouchard, M. (1979) Le diagnostic médical. Modèle d’évaluation des procédures diagnostiques cliniques et techniques. Union Med Can., 108, 515-519.
[7]  El-Sherbiny, W. and Nasr, A.S. (2011) Value of 3-Dimensional Sonohysterography in Infertility Work-Up. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 18, 54-58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.08.697
[8]  Bingol, B., Gunenc, Z., Gedikbasi, A., Guner, H., Tasdemir, S. and Tiras, B. (2011) Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Saline Infusion Sonohysterography, Transvaginalsonography and Hysteroscopy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 31, 54-58.
https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2010.532246
[9]  Ahmadi, F., Rashidy, Z., Haghighi, H., Akhoond, M., Niknejadi, M., Hemat, M., et al. (2013) Uterine Cavity Assessment in Infertile Women: Sensitivity and Specificity of Three-Dimensional Hysterosonography versus Hysteroscopy. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 11, 977.
[10]  Guven, M.A., Bese, T., Demirkiran, F., Idil, M. and Mgoyi, L. (2004) Hydrosonography in Screening for Intracavitary Pathology in Infertile Women. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 86, 377-383.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.05.005
[11]  Acholonu, U.C., Silberzweig, J., Stein, D.E. and Keltz, M. (2011) Hysterosal-pingography versus Sonohysterography for Intrauterine Abnormalities. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 15, 471.
https://doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13176785203923
[12]  Ayida, G., Chamberlain, P., Barlow, D. and Kennedy, S. (1997) Uterine Cavity Assessment Prior to In Vitro Fertilization: Comparison of Transvaginal Scanning, Saline Contrast Hysterosonography and Hysteroscopy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 10, 59-62.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10010059.x
[13]  Makrakis, E. and Pantos, K. (2010) The Outcomes of Hysteroscopy in Women with Implantation Failures after In-Vitro Fertilization: Findings and Effect on Subsequent Pregnancy Rates. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 22, 339-343. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32833beaa3
[14]  Demirol, A. and Gurgan, T. (2004) Effect of Treatment of Intrauterine Pathologies with Office Hysteroscopy in Patients with Recurrent IVF Failure. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 8, 590-594.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61108-X
[15]  Cenksoy, P., Ficiciglu, C., Yildirim, G., Yesiladali, M., et al. (2013) Hysteroscopic Findings in Women with Recurrent IVF Failures and the Effect of Correction of Hysteroscopic Findings on Subsequent Pregnancy Rates. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 287, 357-360.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2627-5
[16]  Soares, S.R., MessalaBatsita Barbosa dos Reis, M. and Camargos, A. (2000) Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonohysterography, Transvaginal Sonography, and Hysterosalpingography in Patients with Uterine Cavity Diseases. Fertility and Sterility, 73, 406-411.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00532-4
[17]  Hosseini, M.A., Eddirimi, N., Mahdavi, A., Aleyasin, A., Safdarian, L., Fallahi, P., et al. (2014) Hysteroscopy in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure Improves the Outcome of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Fresh and Frozen Cycles. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 40, 1324-1330.
[18]  Alatas, C., Urman, B., Aksoy, S., Mercan, R. and Nuh?glu, A. (1998) Evaluation of Uterine Cavity by Sonohysterography in Women Scheduled for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Human Reproduction, 13, 2461-2462.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.9.2461
[19]  Jayaprakasan, K., Polanski, L., Sahu, B., Thornton, J.G. and Raine-Fenning, N. (2014) Surgical Intervention versus Expectant Management for Endometrial Polyps in Subfertile Women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8, CD009592.
[20]  Bosteels, J., Kasius, J., Weyers, S., Broekmans, F.J., Mol, B.W.J. and D’Hooghe, T.M. (2013) Hysteroscopy for Treating Subfertility Associated with Suspected Major Uterine Cavity Abnormalities. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD009461.
[21]  Seshadri, S., El-Toukhy, T., Douiri, A., Jayaprakasan, K. and Khalaf, Y. (2015) Diagnostic Accuracy of Saline Infusion Sonography in the Evaluation of Uterine Cavity Abnormalities Prior to Assisted Reproductive Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Human Reproduction Update, 21, 262-274.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu057
[22]  Emanuel, M.H. and Exalto, N. (2011) Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography (HyFoSy): A New Technique to Visualize Tubal Patency. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 37, 498-499.
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8912
[23]  Monte, G.L., Capobianco, G., Piva, I., Caserta, D., Dessole, S. and Marci, R. (2015) Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography (HyCoSy): Let’s Make the Point! Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 291, 19-30.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3465-4
[24]  Maheux-Lacroix, S., Boutin, A., Moore, L., Bergeron, M.-E., Bujold, E., Lab-erge, P., et al. (2014) Hysterosalpingosonography for Diagnosing Tubal Occlusion in Subfertile Women: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Human Reproduction, 29, 953-963.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu024
[25]  Benkaddour, Y.A., Gervaise, A. and Fernandez, H. (2010) Exploration de la cavité utérine dans le bilan d’infertilité: Quel examen choisir? Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 39, 606-613.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.08.004
[26]  Ahmadi, F. and Javam, M. (2014) Role of 3D Sonohysterography in the Investigation of Uterine Synechiae/Asherman’s Syndrome: Pictorial Assay. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 58, 199-202.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12137
[27]  Panchal, S. and Nagori, C. (2014) Imaging Techniques for Assessment of Tubal Status. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 7, 2-12.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.130797

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413